Delhi Court April 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bt&fc Pvt Ltd and Anr vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-12-2018
$~40 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :12. h APRIL, 2018 CRL.REV.P. 278/2018 ........ Petitioners Through : BT&FC PVT LTD AND ANR STATE & ANR Jo Jo Jose, Advocate. versus Through : Mr.Tarang Srivastava, APP. Mr.B.L.Wati, Advocate for R2 along with A.R. Satish Chandra Pandey. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG + S.P.GARG, J.(Oral) CRL.M.A.No.6609/2018 1. Since the matter has been settled between the parties, the file is taken up today for disposal.2.3. The application stands disposed of. The date already fixed in the matter i.e. 26.04.2018 stands cancelled. CRL.REV.P. 278/2018, CRL.M.B. 5& CRL.M.A.No.661. Present revision petition has been preferred by the petitioners to challenge the legality and correctness of a judgment dated 26.03.2018 of learned Addl. Sessions Judge in Crl.A. No.50/2017 by which findings of the learned Trial Court convicting Crl.Rev.P.278/2018 Page 1 of 3 the petitioners including M.V.Muralidhar, Managing Director, BT&FC Pv...
Union of India vs.mithlesh & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-12-2018
$~24 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:12. 04.2018 FAO1702017 & C.M.No.14642/2017 UNION OF INDIA ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Shipra Shukla, Advocate. Versus MITHLESH & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ajit Rajput, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J (Oral) This appeal impugns an order dated 20.12.2016 passed by the 1. Railway Claims Tribunal (Tribunal), Delhi, granting compensation to the respondents-claimants on account of death of Mr. Sukhveer Singh, the husband, father and son of the respondents No.1, 2 and 3 respectively. The Tribunal found the claim of the respondents valid and having been proven; that the deceased Mr. Sukhveer Singh with a valid ticket No.W75079416 for Rs.20/- had boarded a crowded train from Okhla to Mathura; that the only place he had for standing near the gate of the train compartment; that he fell down due to a sudden movement and violent jerk; that he received serious injuries all over hi...
Sohan Lal vs.jamunawati & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-12-2018
$~12 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:12. h April, 2018 RFA5002016 & CM APPL.26671/2016 SOHAN LAL Through: Mr. Bharat Sharma & Mr. Tala ..... Appellant Chand, Advocates (M-9818699048). versus JAMUNAWATI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Somak Mukhopadhyay, Advocate (M- 16 for R-5,7,14,15 & 9818901745). CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. This is an appeal against the final judgment/decree dated 16th March, 2016 passed by the Trial Court wherein a final decree has been passed in the following terms: 5) In the instant case, admittedly the suit property cannot be partitioned by meets and bounds, therefore, in these circumstances, I find no other option except to put the suit property to auction/sale. Ordered accordingly. Hence, the final decree is passed amongst parties to the suit in respect of the suit property bearing No.H. No.16/347, Gali No.3, Bapa Nagar, Pyare Lal road, Karol Bagh, New Delhi- 110005, as per their declared...
Sardar Guru Sharan Singh vs.surender Kumar Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-12-2018
$~17 to 19 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"12th April, 2018 + RC.REV. 631/2015 and CM291722015 ROSHAN LAL JINDAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. P.D. Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Abhishek Gupta, Advocate Versus SURENDER KUMAR GUPTA Through: Mr. Varun Yadav, Advocate ..... Respondent RC.REV. 632/2015 and CM291742015 + + ATISH KUMAR & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. P.D. Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Abhishek Gupta, Advocate Versus SURENDER KUMAR GUPTA Through: Mr. Varun Yadav, Advocate ..... Respondent RC.REV. 633/2015 and CM291762015 SARDAR GURU SHARAN SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. P.D. Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Abhishek Gupta, Advocate Versus SURENDER KUMAR GUPTA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Varun Yadav, Advocate RCR631-33/2015 Page 1 of 6 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. These petitions seek to assail the orders dated 05.06.2015 of the Additional Rent Controller passed on the files of the eviction petitions (E.No.58/13, E.N...
Kamlesh Kumar Magnani vs.state (Govt of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-12-2018
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI BAIL APPLN. 457/2018 & CRL.M.B. 3DECIDED ON : APRIL12 2018 KAMLESH KUMAR MAGNANI ........ Petitioner Through : Mr.Laksh Khanna, Advocate with Mr.M.A.Khan, Advocate. versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG Through : Mr.Tarang Srivastava, APP. Mr.R.S.Chaggar, Advocate for the complainant. ..... Respondent S.P.GARG, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner Kamlesh Kumar Magnani seeks anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C in case FIR No.77/2018 under Sections 376/328/509 IPC registered at Police Station Punjabi Bagh. Status report is on record.2. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties including the counsel for the complainant and have examined the file. The petitioners counsel urged that the petitioner is a doctor by profession and is pursuing his DNB from Agarsen hospital. The prosecutrix is well-educated and is a Lab Technician by profession. She is adult and works at the said hospital. Counsel further urged ...
Hamendra Nath Sharma vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-12-2018
* % + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 12, 2018 W.P.(C) 3228/2008 & CM297142016 HAMENDRA NATH SHARMA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. U. Srivastava, Advocate Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Bhagwan Swarup Shukla, CGSC & Mr. Kamaldeep, Advocates for respondent No.1 Mr. Bijoy Kumar Pradhan, Mr. Madhav Smita Bora & Mr. Vineet Ranjan, Advocates for respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT Upon retirement of petitioner on 31st August, 2006, he was (ORAL) intimated about pensionary benefits by fourth respondent vide Communication of 17th August, 2006 (Annexure-P-12). As per the aforesaid Communication of 17th August, 2006 (Annexure-P-12), `2,97,693/- was payable to petitioner as gratuity. According to petitioner, a sum of `2,05,813/- has been deducted by fourth respondent from petitioners retiral dues.2. Respondent-Union of India in its counter affidavit has asserted that the deduction from the retiral dues of petiti...
Pulkit Aggarwal vs.reliance General Insurance Company Limited & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-12-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:12. h April, 2018 ..... Appellant Through: Appellant in person $~19 * % + MAC.APP. 692/2017 PULKIT AGGARWAL versus RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Arun Yadav, Advocate for respondent No.1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant has challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.2,37,122/- has been awarded to the appellant. The appellant is seeking enhancement of the compensation amount.2. The accident dated 06th July, 2016 resulted in grievous injuries to the appellant. The appellant suffered 7 cm. X3cm. deep cut starting from the forehead upto head/scalp for which he was initially taken to Mool Chand Hospital and thereafter, taken to Sunder Lal Hospital for minor surgery on 07th July, 2016. The appellant has suffered a scar over his head and forehead.3. The Claims Tribunal awarded Rs.90,000/- towards expenditure on medical e...
Dr Ananya Sharma vs.all India Institute of Medical Sciences
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-12-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:-"12.04.2018 + W.P.(C) 635/2018 & C.M.Nos.2743/2018, 7612/2018 & 14130/2018. DR ANANYA SHARMA ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Mukul Gupta, Sr.Adv with Kr.Mishra, & Mr.Sumit Mr.Tushar Mr.Deepanshu Advs. Gupta ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES versus ..... Respondent Through Mr.V.S.R.Krishna, Adv with Mr.V.Shashank Kumar, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner, who is a MBBS doctor having passed MBBS from Lady Hardinge Medical college, New Delhi in December, 2015 and having appeared in the Post-Graduate Medical Entrance Examination conducted by the respondent/Institute on 12.11.2017 for January, 2018 Session, has prayed for a direction to the respondent to grant the seat of M.D. (Dermatology) allocated to her on the basis of her All India Rank in the aforesaid entrance examination, which seat had been duly accepted by her in first round of counselling...
Atish Kumar & Anr. Vs.surender Kumar Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-12-2018
$~17 to 19 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"12th April, 2018 + RC.REV. 631/2015 and CM291722015 ROSHAN LAL JINDAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. P.D. Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Abhishek Gupta, Advocate Versus SURENDER KUMAR GUPTA Through: Mr. Varun Yadav, Advocate ..... Respondent RC.REV. 632/2015 and CM291742015 + + ATISH KUMAR & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. P.D. Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Abhishek Gupta, Advocate Versus SURENDER KUMAR GUPTA Through: Mr. Varun Yadav, Advocate ..... Respondent RC.REV. 633/2015 and CM291762015 SARDAR GURU SHARAN SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. P.D. Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Abhishek Gupta, Advocate Versus SURENDER KUMAR GUPTA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Varun Yadav, Advocate RCR631-33/2015 Page 1 of 6 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. These petitions seek to assail the orders dated 05.06.2015 of the Additional Rent Controller passed on the files of the eviction petitions (E.No.58/13, E.N...
Tarkeshwr Jha vs.food Corporation of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-12-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: April 12, 2018 + W.P. (C) 7009/2016 TARKESHWR JHA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajnish Kumar Jha, Advocate CORAM: Versus FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: Mrs. Harvinder Oberoi, Advocate .....Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR1 JUDGMENT Quashing of order of 18th February, 2016 (Annexure P-8) and grant (ORAL) of Selection Grade Scale w.e.f. 1st December, 1996, is sought by petitioner. Vide impugned order of 18th February, 2016 (Annexure P-8), petitioners Representation for grant of Selection Grade Scale in the post of Assistant Grade-I, has been declined by respondents, as petitioner was promoted on 27th February, 2001 and there was no vacancy prior thereto.2. It is the case of petitioner that he became eligible for grant of Selection Grade Scale w.e.f. 1st December, 1996 and eight of his juniors have been granted Selection Grade Scale.... Petitioners counsel submits that in the Zonal Seniority List of Assistant...
- ‹ Prev
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- Next ›
- Last »