Delhi Court April 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shiromani Gurdwara Prabandhak Committee vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-12-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:12. h April, 2018 TEST.CAS. 31/1994 SHIROMANI GURDWARA PRABANDHAK COMMITTEE ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. S.K. Dubey & Mr. Rajmangal Kumar, Advs. Versus STATE Through: Mr. Avadh Kaushik, Adv. ..... Respondent for Objector. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 The petitioner seeks probate of the document dated 1st March, 1988 as the validly executed last Will of the deceased Jagdish Singh @ Sant Jee, son of Sh. Hari Singh, ordinary resident of C-150, Tanki Road, Bhajan Pura, Delhi.2. This petition was filed, pleading i) that the petitioner is a body corporate constituted under the provisions of the Sikh Gurdwaras Act, 1925 and manages and controls Darbar Sahib Amritsar and Akal Takhat Sahib, Amritsar, besides other religious places; ii) that the deceased Jagdish Singh died on 3rd March, 1988 in an accident in District Ettah (U.P.); iii) that the Will was got registered at Delhi after the death of the deceased Ja...
Suraj vs.state of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-12-2018
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + BAIL APPLN. 1982/2017 Judgment delivered on:12. 04.2018 SURAJ versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent : Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent : Mr. S.S. Rawat with Ms. Nirmal Chawla, Advocates. Mr. Akshay Malik, APP for the State. Mr. Sanjeev Chopra, Advocate for complainant. ASI Jai Bhagwan, PS Pandav Nagar. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT1204.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) BAIL APPLN. 1982/2017 1. Nominal Roll of the petitioner has been received. It shows that the petitioner had undergone 1 year 3 months and 29 days incarceration as on 20.02.2018 and further 1 month 22 days have passed.2.... Petitioner seeks Regular Bail in FIR No.460/2016 under Section 307 IPC, Police Station Pandav Nagar. The allegations in the FIR are that the petitioner and the respondent, Page 1 of 3 3. BAIL APPLN. 1982/2017 both aged 20 years, are known to each other being the...
Shakuntala Devi vs.madan Jha
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-12-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:12. 04.2018 LPA4382010, C.M. APPL.11567-11570/2010, 401-403/2011 & 38966/2017 SHAKUNTALA DEVI Through : None. ..... Appellant versus Through : Sh. Raghuvinder Varma, Advocate. MADAN JHA CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. CHAWLA ..... Respondent MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % 1. None appeared on behalf of the appellant.2. The appellant is aggrieved by the judgment and the order of the learned Single Judge rejecting her writ petition.3. The appellant had applied for mutation of agricultural lands (hereafter the lands) in her favour. The appellant is the daughter of Siri Lal who died in 1965. She got married in 1977. Later, the contesting respondents (hereafter referred to collectively as Jai Singh) sought for mutation of the lands, arguing that by virtue of Sections 50 and 51 of the Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954 [hereafter the 1954 Act]., the appellant could not claim mutation and instead...
Manoj Kumar vs.sushma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-12-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on: April 12 , 2018 CRL.A.1168/2016 MANOJ KUMAR ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Vijay Shankar, Advocate with Appellant in person SUSHMA versus Represented by: Mr.Arvind Nagar, Advocate ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A.No.19109/2016 For the reasons stated in the application, delay of 28 days in filing the appeal is condoned. Application is disposed of. Crl.A.No.1168/2016 1. Aggrieved by the order dated 30th July, 2016 dismissing the application of the petitioner under Section 340 Cr.P.C. by the learned Family Court, Dwarka, the appellant prefers the present appeal.2. Case of the appellant before the Court was that though the respondent resigned from her job at Blazeflash Courier on 30th June, 2011, on the date when she filed an application before the learned Judge Family Court i.e. on 2nd May, 2011 under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, she falsely claimed that she was unem...
Mohit Gupta & Anr vs.rajiv Khosla & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-12-2018
$~8 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"12th April, 2018 + CM(M) 222/2017 and CM74722017 MOHIT GUPTA & ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Abhijat, Mr. Sumant De and Mr. Shaashwat Jindal, Advocates Versus RAJIV KHOSLA & ORS ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Tajinder Singh, Adv. for R-1 with Respondent no.1 in person Respondent no.4 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The petition seeks to assail the order dated 22.12.2016 passed by the Additional District Judge on the file of the civil suit (CS no.736/2016) which was instituted on the date of the said order by the first to fourth respondents (collectively, the plaintiffs) impleading, amongst others, the petitioners as the defendants. The case relates to grievances of the plaintiffs vis--vis the election held for the various posts in the Executive Committee of Delhi High Court Bar Association (DHCBA) i.e. the fifth respondent on 18.11.2016. The plaintiffs seek declaration that the said election ...
National Highways Authority of India vs.ncc-vee(jv)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-12-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on:20. h March, 2018 Pronounced on:12. h April, 2018 + O.M.P. (COMM) 149/2017 and IA No.3726/2017 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA Through : Mr.Manish K ........ Petitioner Bishnoi, Mr.Devansh and Mr.Ashok C Parkash Malhotra, Advocates. Srivastava, versus NCC-VEE(JV) ..... Respondent Through : Mr.T.K.Ganju, Sr Advocate with Mr.manish Dembla and Ms.Ankita Rai, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.1. This petition is under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 read with section 10(2) of the Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of High Court Act 2015 arising out of the majority order dated 06.01.2017 passed by the learned tribunal.2. The learned arbitral tribunal had allowed an application filed by the respondent under Section 12(3) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act O.M.P. (COMM) 149/2017 Page 1 of 16 allegedly in contradiction to the rig...
National Insurance Co Ltd vs.meenu Bhatiya & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-12-2018
* + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: April 12, 2018 MAC.APP. 56/2017 & CM18782017 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. L.K. Tyagi, Advocate versus MEENU BHATIYA & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr.Aatreya Singh and Mr. Rajiv Kumar Trivedi, Advocates for respondents No.1 to 5-Claimants CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-1 (Central), Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal) vide impugned Award of 18th October, 2016 has granted compensation of `43,59,496/- to respondents- Claimants on account of death of one Arvind Kumar @ Aravind Bhatiya, aged 31 years, in a vehicular accident on 7th December, 2014. The facts, as noticed in impugned Award, are as under: - In brief, FIR No.6dated 08.12.2014 U/s 279/337/304A IPC was registered at Police Station: Ranjit Nagar on statement of injured Ashok Kumar aged about 19 years. As per statement of Ashok Kumar on 07.12.2014 he along with Arvind Singh...
M/S Goodone Traders Pvt. Ltd. (Formerly Known as M/S Yogmaya Traders P ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-12-2018
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI WRIT PETITION(CIVIL) No.5082/2017 Date of decision:12. h April, 2018 M/S WELLDONE EXIM PVT. LTD. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS M/S G.D. MANGALAM EXIM PVT. LTD.) ........ Petitioner Through Mr. G.K. Sarkar, Ms. Malabika Sarkar, Mr. Prashant Srivastava and Mr. Deepak Mahajan, Advocates. versus DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF FOREIGN TRADE & ANR...Respondent Through Mr. Amit Mahajan, Advocate for DGFT. Mr. Sanjeev Narula, Sr. Standing Counsel for Customs. WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.5091/2017 M/S ATTIRE DEISIGNERS PVT. LTD. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS M/S ........ Petitioner SIDH DESIGNERS PVT. LTD.) Through Mr. G.K. Sarkar, Ms. Malabika Sarkar, Mr. Prashant Srivastava and Mr. Deepak Mahajan, Advocates. versus DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF FOREIGN TRADE & ANR...Respondent Through Mr. Amit Mahajan, Advocate for DGFT. Mr. Sanjeev Narula, Sr. Standing Counsel for Customs. W.P. (C) Nos. 5082/2017, 5091/2017 & 5093/2017 Page 1 of 14 M/S GOODONE TRADERS PVT. LTD. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS M/S ...
Roshan Lal Jindal vs.surender Kumar Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-12-2018
$~17 to 19 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"12th April, 2018 + RC.REV. 631/2015 and CM291722015 ROSHAN LAL JINDAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. P.D. Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Abhishek Gupta, Advocate Versus SURENDER KUMAR GUPTA Through: Mr. Varun Yadav, Advocate ..... Respondent RC.REV. 632/2015 and CM291742015 + + ATISH KUMAR & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. P.D. Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Abhishek Gupta, Advocate Versus SURENDER KUMAR GUPTA Through: Mr. Varun Yadav, Advocate ..... Respondent RC.REV. 633/2015 and CM291762015 SARDAR GURU SHARAN SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. P.D. Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Abhishek Gupta, Advocate Versus SURENDER KUMAR GUPTA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Varun Yadav, Advocate RCR631-33/2015 Page 1 of 6 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. These petitions seek to assail the orders dated 05.06.2015 of the Additional Rent Controller passed on the files of the eviction petitions (E.No.58/13, E.N...
Dinesh Kumar & Ors vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-12-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:12. h April, 2018 $~29 * % + W.P.(C) 4736/2015 DINESH KUMAR & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Rajesh Gupta and Mr. Harpreet Singh, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajesh Kumar and Mr. Sidharth Rathore, Advocates for UOI. Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for L&B/LAC. Mr. Dhanesh Relan, Standing Counsel with Ms. Komal Sorout and Ms. Mrinalini Sharma, Advocates for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioners have filed the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Counsel for the petitioners submits that the case of the petitioners is fully covered by the decision rendered in the case of N.K.Bakshi & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors., W.P.(C) 8989/2014. It is stated that the acquisition made through the notification published on 26.04.2013 is contrary...
- ‹ Prev
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- Next ›
- Last »