Delhi Court April 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Saraswati Printers vs.blessing Advertising Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-12-2018
$~CP-17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:12. 04.2018 + CO.PET. 244/2015 & CA No.1150/2015 SARASWATI PRINTERS Through Mr.Rakesh Kakkar, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus BLESSING ADVERTISING PVT. LTD. Through Mr.Mukul Girdhar, Adv. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) On 28.02.2018 I had heard the learned counsel for the parties and 1. indicated that I am inclined to admit the petition to appoint the OL as provisional liquidator. At that stage, the learned counsel for the respondent sought an opportunity to take instructions from his client regarding payment of the dues of the petitioner. Thereafter, the learned counsel for the respondent has taken two adjournments on 19.03.2018, 03.04.2018 and now the matter has been fixed for today.2. Today, the learned counsel for the respondent states that he is not getting instructions from his client and he would like to withdraw from the matter. I, hence proceed to decide the peti...
Waseema & Anr vs.saeedah Haque & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-12-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:12. h April, 2018. CS(OS) 151/2018 WASEEMA & ANR ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Sachin Chopra, Mr. Siddharth Sharma and Mr. Himanshu Nailwal, Advs. Versus SAEEDAH HAQUE & ORS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW IA No.4849/2018 (for exemption) 1. Through: None. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. ..... Defendants 2. The application is disposed of. CS(OS) 151/2018 & IA No.4848/2018 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC) 3. The two plaintiffs namely Waseema and Naseema, in this suit for partition, declaration, permanent and mandatory injunctions against their three siblings namely Saeedah Haque, Ahmed Mauji Khan and Amjad Ali Khan, seek (i) partition of property No.L-57, Abdul Fazal Enclave, Jamia Nagar, Okhla, New Delhi admeasuring 500 sq. yds., claiming to be entitled to 200 sq. yds. therefrom; (ii) declaration that the defendant No.1, by way of General Power of Attorney (GPA), Agreement to Sell and Affidavit dated 28th April, 2001...
Rahul Chaudhary vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-12-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on : April 06, 2018 Judgment Delivered on : April 12, 2018 W.P.(C) 6870/2017 RAHUL CHAUDHARY ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Anil Singhal, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.J.K.Singh, Standing Counsel with Mr.Ranjeet Kumar, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRATIBHA RANI, J.1. The petitioner has invoked the writ jurisdiction vested in this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, impugning the order dated 19.05.2017 passed by the IG-cum-CSC, RPSF, New Delhi whereby his candidature for the post of Constable in the RPF/RPSF has been cancelled and he has been discharged.2. Mr.Anil Singhal, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has not been found guilty of suppression of facts relating to his involvement in a criminal case as the details of the case were disclosed by him in the Attestation Form. He stat...
Saroj Bala vs.state of Nct of Nct of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-12-2018
#3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LPA2182017 SAROJ BALA Judgment delivered on:12. 04.2018 ..... Appellant versus STATE OF NCT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr CSS Tomar, Advocate : Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, ASC for GNCTD with Ms. Deboshree Mukherjee, Advocate for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J (ORAL) 1. The present Letters Patent Appeal assails a judgment and order dated 17.02.2017 rendered by a learned Single Judge of this Court, whereby W.P.(C) No.5196/2010 (hereinafter referred to as subject petition) LPA2182017 Page 1 of 4 instituted on behalf of the appellant, seeking regularisation of services came to be dismissed.2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant has raised two distinct issues. The first submission made on behalf of the appellant is that by way of the impugned judgment and order dated ...
Hdfc Ergo General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.kulwant Kaur (Since Deceased) ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-12-2018
$~27 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"12th April, 2018 + MAC.APP. 1155/2012 and CM Nos. 18665-18666/2012 HDFC ERGO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. Through: Mr. Shrey Mehta, Adv. ..... Appellant versus KULWANT KAUR (SINCE DECEASED) THR. LRs & ORS. Through: ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Santosh Kumar and Mr. Digvijay Singh Jaswal, Advs. for R-2 to R-5. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The appeal at hand has been preferred by the insurance company (insurer) against which the liability to pay compensation determined by the Tribunal has been fastened by the judgment dated 29.05.2012 passed on the accident claim case (MACT No.109/2011) which was instituted on 22.03.2011 by the first to fifth respondents on their behalf and on behalf of the respondent No.5A (all collectively, the claimants) on account of death of Gopal Singh, aged 67 years, due to injuries suffered in motor vehicular accident that had occurred on 30.11.2010 due to negligent driving of motor vehic...
Vior(international) Ltd & Anr vs.maxycon Health Care Private Limited & ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-12-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:12. h March, 2018 Pronounced on:12. h April, 2018 CS(COMM) 712/2018 VIOR(INTERNATIONAL) LTD & ANR ..... Plaintiffs Through : Ms.Vaishali Mittal and Ms.Vrinda Gambhir, Advocates. versus MAXYCON HEALTH CARE PRIVATE LIMITED & OTHERS ..... Defendants Through : None being ex parte. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.1. The plaintiffs have filed this suit for restraining the defendants from infringement of Indian Patent No.221536; infringement of copyright in the literary work; dilution & tarnishment of brand image of the plaintiffs; malicious falsehood; delivery up; rendition of accounts; damages etc against the defendants.2. At the outset, it is to be noted during pendency of the suit, vide order dated 22.12.2015 the suit against defendant No.1 was not pressed and the none appeared on behalf of the defendant No.2 despite service. The proceedings were treated as ex parte against sole remaining defendant. Subseq...
Sameer @ Mustakim vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-12-2018
$~16. * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:12. 04.2018 % CRL.A. 17/2018 SAMEER @ MUSTAKIM Through: Mrs. Kavita Jha, Mr. Rajeev K Jha and Mr. Vaibhav Kulkarni, Advocates ..... Appellant versus Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for the State. ..... Respondent STATE CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P. S. TEJI VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) 1. The appellant has preferred the present appeal under Section 374(2) Cr PC to assail his conviction by the learned ASJ/ Pilot Court/ North District, Rohini Courts, Delhi in Sessions Case No.59263/2016 arising out of FIR4072016 under Section 302/2IPC and Section 25 Arms Act registered at PS K.N.K. Marg by the impugned judgment dated 17.10.2017. The appellant also assails the order of sentence dated 25.10.2017, whereby he has been sentenced to life imprisonment for the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC with a fine of Rs.5,000/- in default to undergo simple CRL.A. 17/2018 Page 1 of 22 imprisonment for six m...
Bahadur Dass vs.mohd. Shakeel & Ors (Relaince General Insurance Co. Lt ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-12-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~12 * % + MAC.APP. 284/2017 BAHADUR DASS Date of Decision:12. h April, 2018 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Manish Maini and Ms. Hreeshika Bhargav, Advs. versus MOHD. SHAKEEL & ORS (RELAINCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD) ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Abhishek Rana, Adv. for R1 & R4. Mr. Rajeev M. Roy and Mr. P. Srinivasan, Advs. for R3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant has challenged the award dated 23rd September, 2016 whereby compensation of Rs.3,80,111/- has been awarded by the Claims Tribunal.2. The accident dated 04th January, 2014 resulted in grievous injuries to the appellant. The appellant suffered fracture of bones upper limb as well as compound communited fracture distal radins (left) with minuted fracture proximal tibia (left) with infected would over ulna and ulna styloid (left). The appellant remain hospitalized for 04th January, 2014 to 13th January, MAC. APP. 284/2017 Page 1 of 3 2014 when he un...
Punj Lloyd Limited vs.ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Govt. Of In ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-12-2018
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P. (COMM) 152/2018 & IA No.4875/2018 & IA No.4876/2018 PUNJ LLOYD LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Anil Sapra, Sr. Advocate with Mr Shambhu Sharan, Ms Divya Krishnan and Mr Sarthak Katyal, Advocates. versus MINISTRY OF HEALTH & FAMILY WELFARE, GOVT. OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER1204.2018 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner (hereafter PLL) has filed the present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act (hereafter the Act) challenging an arbitral award dated 07.12.2017 (hereafter the impugned award) delivered by an arbitral tribunal constituted by a sole arbitrator (hereafter the Arbitral Tribunal).2. By the impugned award, the Arbitral Tribunal has rejected the claim preferred by PLL on account of escalation under Clause 10 CC of the General Conditions of Contract (GCC). Although the Arbitral Tribunal accepted some of the claims made by PLL, it rejected th...
M/S. Seagull Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd. Vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-12-2018
$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2407/2014 M/S. SEAGULL PHARMACEUTICALS PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Niraj Kr. Singh with Mr.Ankur Singh Judgement Pronounced on:12. 04.2018 versus Advs. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Deepak Kikhari, Adv. for R-4. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J (ORAL) This is a writ petition in which the following substantive prayers have been 2. 1. Issue a writ/direction in the nature of Mandamus or Certiorari or any other Writ thereby quashing the notices issued by respondent No.2, dated 11.02.204, 05.10.2011, 09.05.2011, 23.03.2011 & 14.12.2010, to meet the ends of justice. Restrain respondent Nos.1 and 2 from initiating any coercive action, pursuant to impugned notice, for effecting recovery of amount till the disposal of present petition, against the petitioner to serve the ends of justice. Direct the respondent No.1 and 2 to delete the name of petitioner from the array of the...
- ‹ Prev
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- Next ›
- Last »