Delhi Court July 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sushil Kumar Jain Vs. Delhi Development Authority
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-07-2015
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Pronounced on:7. h July, 2015 + REVIEW PETITION No.346/2014 in W.P.(C) 7433/2012 SUSHIL KUMAR JAIN Through: ..... Petitioner Ms. Richa Kapoor, Advocate versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Standing Counsel for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL G. P. MITTAL, J.1. By virtue of this Review Petition, the Respondent (DDA) seeks review of the judgment dated 12.11.2013 passed by this Court whereby a writ of mandamus was issued to the DDA to allot a flat of equivalent area (to the area of Petitioners allotted flat) to the Petitioner (Sushil Kumar Jain) at the price as prevalent in the year 2012 within a period of twelve weeks.2. In fact, the Respondent (DDA) had preferred an LPA against the judgment dated 12.11.2013. One of the submissions raised by the Respondent (DDA) before the Division Bench was that the NRPS Scheme, 1979 (under which the Petitioner had registered for allotment of an MIG f...
Ravinder Das and Ors. Vs. The State and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-07-2015
$~49 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:7. h July, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 2665/2015 RAVINDER DAS & ORS. ..... Petitioners Represented by: Mr. R.K. Gupta, Advocate versus THE STATE & ANR ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr. Satish Kumar Verma, APP for the State. SI Naveen Kumar, PS Jyoti Nagar. Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) CRL.M.C. 2665/2015 1. By way of this petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, petitioners seek quashing FIR No.52/14 registered at PS Jyoti Nagar, Delhi for the offences punishable under section 498-A/406/34 IPC read with section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 and the consequential proceedings emanating therefrom against the petitioners on the ground that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties.2. Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that the aforesaid case was registered on the complaint of respondent No.2,...
Deepak Fertilizers and Petrochemicals Corporation Vs. Union of India a ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-07-2015
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:07. 07.2015 + W.P.(C) 2973/2014, CM61772014, 6387-6388/2014, 6933-6934/2014 DEEPAK FERTILIZERS AND PETROCHEMICALS CORPORATION LIMITED ..... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Dr A. M. Singhvi, Sr. Advocate with Mr Rishi Agrawala and Mr Karan Luthra For the Respondents : Mr Sanjay Jain, ASG with Mr Vikram Jetly, CGSC and Mr Vidur Mohan for R-1 & 2. Mr Vishnu Sharma with Mr K.R. Sasiprabhu, for RGTIL CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner company is engaged in the business of manufacturing of complex fertilizers, i.e. Phosphatic & Potash (P&K) fertilizers, by using natural gas being supplied to the petitioner company from various domestic sources. Initially, the petitioner was allocated 0.6 mmscmd of natural gas from oil fields of ONGC, Tapti Basin and Pana-Mukta and on 27.10.2009, the Empowered Group of Minis...
Murari Lal Vs. M/S. D.C.M. Ltd. and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-07-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 3829/2002 Judgment reserved on:19. 05.2015 Judgement pronounced on:07. 07.2015 MURARI LAL ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.S.B.S. Vashistha, Advocate with petitioner in person. versus M/S. D.C.M. LTD & ANR. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Harvinder Singh, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA JUDGMENT1 The brief background of the case is that the respondents M/s Delhi Cloth Mills had filed the writ petition No.2476/1988 challenging the legality of the order of the Lieutenant Governor and others whereby the permission to close down the company under Section 25(O) of the Industrial Disputes Act was denied.2. During the pendency of the said writ petition before the full court, the parties had reached to a settlement dated 26.11.1998 which settlement was confirmed by the full Bench of this court. In that settlement, the respondent had agreed to pay the retrenchment compensation and other benefits to its workmen as defined in Clause...
Chander Pal Vs. State ( Govt of Nct) of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-07-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :2. d JULY, 2015 DECIDED ON :7. h JULY, 2015 + CRL.A. 795/2011 CHANDER PAL ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Ajay Verma, Advocate with Ms.Neha Singh, Advocate. versus STATE ( GOVT OF NCT) OF DELHI Through : ..... Respondent Mr.Navin K.Jha, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. X (assumed name) aged around 12 years was ravished on 16.05.2009 at about 02.30 p.m. on the roof of her House No.A-91, gali No.15, Ambika Vihar, Karawal Nagar when she had gone there to answer call of nature. Her parents were not present at the house that time. PW-2 (Kanti Devi) who lived in her neighbourhood happened to witness the incident from the roof of her house. The appellant succeeded to flee the spot before her arrival. She brought X downstairs and promptly informed her father about the incident. When Xs parents reached home, they approached the police. Daily Diary (DD) No.11A (mark PW-14/AA) came into existence at 03.55 p.m. at PS Karawa...
Tema India Ltd. Vs. Engineers India Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-07-2015
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. 239/2013 Reserved on:27. h May 2015 Decided on:7. h July 2015 TEMA INDIA LTD. Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Akhil Sibal, Mr. Nikhil Chawla and Mr. Aditya Panda, Mr. Shikhar Bhardwaj, Advocates versus ENGINEERS INDIA LTD. Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Dhruv Dewan and Ms. Reena Choudhary, Advocates CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR ORDER % 07.07.2015 1. This petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act) is directed against an Award dated 22nd October, 2012 passed by the Sole Arbitrator in the disputes between the parties.2. The facts are that the Respondent Engineers India Limited (EIL) had placed on the Petitioner TEMA India Limited (TEMA), a Purchase Order (PO) dated 27th February, 2008 for supply of 9 Heat Exchangers High Pressure (Screw Plug/Breach Lock) on FOT Dispatch Point Basis for consideration of Rs. 29,92,50,000/-. EIL was procuring the said equipments for Chennai Petroleum Corporation Limited (CPCL...
Harpal Singh and Anr. Vs. The State and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-07-2015
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:7. h July, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 10/2015 HARPAL SINGH & ANR. ..... Petitioners Represented by: Mr. Ashwini K. Sakhuja and Mr. Puneet Saini, Advocates. versus THE STATE & ANR ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for the State. Mr. Sumit Dwivedi, Adv. for Respondent No.2 with Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) CRL.M.C. 10/2015 1. By way of this petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.47/97 registered at PS Shalimar Bagh, Delhi for the offences punishable under section 498-A/406 IPC and the consequential proceedings emanating therefrom against the petitioners on the ground that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties.2. Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that the aforesaid case was registered on the complaint of respondent No.2, Smt. Raj Kaur, con...
Gati Ltd Vs. Air India Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-07-2015
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:25. h May 2015 Date of Decision:7. h July 2015 + O.M.P. 1264/2013 AIR INDIA LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. R.S. Suri, Senior Advocate with Mr. Manoj Arora, Mr. Siddharth Shanker and Ms. Pallavi Tayal Chadda, Advocates. versus GATI LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. P.V. Kapur, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vijay Nair, Mr. Ravi Gandhi, Mr. Puneet Damodar and Mr. Ritesh Sharma, Advocates. And O.M.P. 1082/2014 GATI LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. P.V. Kapur, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vijay Nair, Mr. Ravi Gandhi, Mr. Puneet Damodar and Mr. Ritesh Sharma, Advocates versus AIR INDIA LTD. OMP Nos. 1264 & 1082/2014 ..... Respondent Through: Mr. R.S. Suri, Senior Advocate with Mr. Manoj Arora, Mr. Siddharth Shanker and Ms. Pallavi Tayal Chadda, Advocates. Page 1 of 27 CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUDGEMENT % 07.07.2015 1. These are two petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act) challenging the unanimous Aw...
Air India Ltd Vs. Gati Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-07-2015
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:25. h May 2015 Date of Decision:7. h July 2015 + O.M.P. 1264/2013 AIR INDIA LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. R.S. Suri, Senior Advocate with Mr. Manoj Arora, Mr. Siddharth Shanker and Ms. Pallavi Tayal Chadda, Advocates. versus GATI LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. P.V. Kapur, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vijay Nair, Mr. Ravi Gandhi, Mr. Puneet Damodar and Mr. Ritesh Sharma, Advocates. And O.M.P. 1082/2014 GATI LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. P.V. Kapur, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vijay Nair, Mr. Ravi Gandhi, Mr. Puneet Damodar and Mr. Ritesh Sharma, Advocates versus AIR INDIA LTD. OMP Nos. 1264 & 1082/2014 ..... Respondent Through: Mr. R.S. Suri, Senior Advocate with Mr. Manoj Arora, Mr. Siddharth Shanker and Ms. Pallavi Tayal Chadda, Advocates. Page 1 of 27 CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUDGEMENT % 07.07.2015 1. These are two petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act) challenging the unanimous Aw...
Repute Land and Leasing Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-07-2015
$~14 THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:07. 07.2015 W.P. (C) 2465/2015 & CM No.4428/2015 (stay) REPUTE LAND AND LEASING PVT. LTD. ... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Sumit Bansal, Mr Ateev Mathur and Ms Richa Oberoi. For the Respondents : Mr Bhagvan Swarup Shukla, CGSC with Mr Pradeep Kumar Sharma and Mr R. Kapoor, Advocates for respondent No.1. Mr Siddharth Panda with Mr Priyabrat Sahu, Advocates for respondent No.2. Mr Dhanesh Relan, Advocate for respondent No.3. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. Mr Siddharth Panda, the learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2 has handed over the affidavit on behalf of Land & Building Deptt. The same is taken on record. The learned counsel for the petitioner does not wish to file any rejoinder affidavit inasmuch as all the necessary averments are cont...