Delhi Court July 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Neelam Goyal Vs. Ravi Sharma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-08-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Order delivered on: July 08, 2015 CRL.M.C. 705/2015 & Crl. M.A. No.2702/2015 OMWAY BUILD ESTATE PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR ..... Petitioners Through Mr. Meet Malhotra, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Ashish Aggarwal, Adv. versus RAVI SHARMA Through + ..... Respondent Mr.Jagdeep Sharma, Adv. with Mr.Misbah Bin Tariq, Adv. CRL.M.C. 5731/2014, Crl. M.A. Nos.19563/2014 & 1699/2015 NEELAM GOYAL Through ..... Petitioner Mr. Meet Malhotra, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Ashish Aggarwal, Adv. versus RAVI SHARMA Through + ..... Respondent Mr.Jagdeep Sharma, Adv. with Mr.Misbah Bin Tariq, Adv. CRL.M.C. 5746/2014 & Crl. M.A. No.19584/2014 NEELAM GOYAL Through ..... Petitioner Mr. Meet Malhotra, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Ashish Aggarwal, Adv. versus SATYENDRA JAIN Through Crl. M.C. Nos.705/2015, 5731/2014 & 5746/2014 ..... Respondent Mr.Jagdeep Sharma, Adv. with CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. Two petitioners, namely, Omway Build Estate Pvt. Ltd. and Janak Goel hav...
M/S Jolly Videotronics Vs. Anita Thapar and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-08-2015
$~10 & 2. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % Date of Decision:08. 07.2015 RSA1572015 and C.M. No.7634/2015 M/S JOLLY VIDEOTRONICS Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Pankaj Chaudhary, Advocate. versus SATISH THAPAR & ANR ..... Respondents Through: + RSA1772015 and C.M. Nos.8510-8512/2015 M/S JOLLY VIDEOTRONICS Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Pankaj Chaudhary, Advocate. versus ANITA THAPAR & ANR ..... Respondents Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI VIPIN SANGHI, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. The present second appeals preferred under Section 100 CPC are directed against the judgment dated 05.12.2014 passed by Sh.Raghubir Singh, ADJ-15 (Central), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in RCA No.14/14/12 and RCA No.15/14/12, whereby the said first appeals preferred by the appellant/ defendant No.1 in the suit had been dismissed.2. The plaintiffs, who are impleaded as respondent in the respective appeals are husband and wife. Both the plaintiffs preferred their respective suits for recoveries. Appella...
Ram Prakash and Ors. Vs. The State Govt of Nct of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-08-2015
$~42 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:8. h July, 2015 + CRL.M.C.No.2678/2015 RAM PRAKASH & ORS. Represented by: ..... Petitioners Mr. Prem Chandra, Advocate. Versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr. Neeraj K. Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Mr. R.S. Kashyap, Advocate for the Respondent No.2 with Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) Crl. M.A. No.9564/2015 (for exemption) Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Accordingly, the application is allowed. CRL.M.C.No.2678/2015 1. By way of this petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.769/2007 registered at Police Station Preet Vihar, for the offences punishable under Sections 452/323/325/326/506/34 IPC and the consequential proceedings emanating therefrom against the petitioners on the ground that the matter has been amica...
Suraj Verma Vs. Delhi Development Authority and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-08-2015
$~ *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % RFA No.299/2011 Date of Decision :8. h July, 2015 SURAJ VERMA Through : ..... Appellant Mr. Pankaj Sinha and Ms. Noopur Dubey, Advocates versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & OTHERS ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Arjun Pant, Advocate + % RFA No.307/2011 Date of Decision : DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & OTHERS ..... Appellant Through : Mr. Arjun Pant, Advocate versus SURAJ VERMA & ANOTHER ....Respondent Through : Mr. Pankaj Sinha and Ms. Noopur Dubey, Advocates CORAM :HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT1 The learned Trial Court has passed a decree of Rs.8,00,000/- along with interest @ 6% per annum which is under challenge in his appeal by both the parties. The appellant in RFA No.299/2011 is seeking enhancement of the compensation awarded by the learned Trial Court whereas the appellant in RFA No.307/2011 is seeking reduction of the compensation amount. For the sake of convenience, the appellant in RFA No.299/2011 is referred to as plai...
Delhi Development Authority and Others Vs. Suraj Verma and Another
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-08-2015
$~ *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % RFA No.299/2011 Date of Decision :8. h July, 2015 SURAJ VERMA Through : ..... Appellant Mr. Pankaj Sinha and Ms. Noopur Dubey, Advocates versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & OTHERS ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Arjun Pant, Advocate + % RFA No.307/2011 Date of Decision : DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & OTHERS ..... Appellant Through : Mr. Arjun Pant, Advocate versus SURAJ VERMA & ANOTHER ....Respondent Through : Mr. Pankaj Sinha and Ms. Noopur Dubey, Advocates CORAM :HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT1 The learned Trial Court has passed a decree of Rs.8,00,000/- along with interest @ 6% per annum which is under challenge in his appeal by both the parties. The appellant in RFA No.299/2011 is seeking enhancement of the compensation awarded by the learned Trial Court whereas the appellant in RFA No.307/2011 is seeking reduction of the compensation amount. For the sake of convenience, the appellant in RFA No.299/2011 is referred to as plai...
Ram Lubhai Vs. Sanjay Bhasin and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-08-2015
$~33. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 276/2010 RAM LUBHAI ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. T.K. Tiwari and Mr. Abhay Kumar Verma, Advocates with plaintiff in person. versus SANJAY BHASIN & ORS ..... Defendants Through: Ms. Swati Kumar, Advocate for Mr. Alok Sharma, Advocate for the defendants with D-1(a), 2, 3(f), 4, 5(a) to (c), 6 and Mr. Atul Chadha for D-7 in person. Mr. Rishi Manchanda, Advocate for Mr. Sanjay Wadhwa with Mr. Sanjay Wadhwa in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % ORDER0807.2015 I.A. 13387/2015 (by the plaintiff u/O I R10CPC for addition of necessary parties) 1. The present application has been filed by the plaintiff stating inter alia that he has filed the accompanying suit for partition against the defendants in respect of an immovable property owned by late Shri Bhagat Ram, predecessor-in-title of the parties.2. At the time of instituting the present suit, the plaintiff had arrayed Shri Sanjay Bhasin (grandson of late Shri Bhagat Ram) as ...
I.A.L. Airport Services Ltd. Vs. Sh. Anil Kumar Rathore and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-08-2015
$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:8. h July, 2015 + W.P.(C) 3461/2012 I.A.L. AIRPORT SERVICES LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Lalit Bhasin and Ms. Bhavna Dhami, Advocates versus SH. ANIL KUMAR RATHORE AND ORS. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rakesh K. Mudgal and Mr. Dinesh Mudgal, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA : SUNITA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1. The short question involved in the present Civil Writ Petition filed by the petitioner under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India is whether the Presiding Officer, Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court-I, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi was justified in not framing the issues on the preliminary objections raised by the petitioner in ID No.34/ 2012.2. The factual matrix of the case as disclosed in the writ petition are that Indian Airlines Ltd.-Airport Service Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as IAL-ASL) was incorporated under the Companies Act. It was wholly own subsidiary of Indian...
Bbel-Mipl Joint Venture Vs. National Highway Authority of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-07-2015
* + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI OMP No.363/2015 7th July, 2015 BBEL-MIPL JOINT VENTURE Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sanjeev Kumar and Mr. Naik H.K, Advs. versus NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This is a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Petitioner was the claimant in the arbitration proceedings. Claim no.2 was made by the petitioner for reimbursement of the labour cess amount of Rs.2,68,71,577/-. Cess was deducted from each interim payment certificate at 1% of the gross value of the work done. The case of the petitioner is that the cess which has been imposed under the Building and Other Construction Workers Welfare Cess Act, 1996 (in short BOCW Act) is a subsequent legislation which came into force after opening of the bid submitted by the petitioner, and being a subsequent legislation, respon...
Mohit Vs. Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-07-2015
$~45 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:7. h July, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 2656/2015 MOHIT ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Himanshu Dutt, Adv. with petitioner in person. versus GOVERNMENT OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr. M.N.Dudeja, APP for State with SI Sumit Kumar, PS-Bawana. Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. Vide the present petition; petitioner seeks directions thereby quashing FIR No.309/2015, registered at PS-Bawana for the offences punishable under Sections 323/452/506 IPC.2. Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that aforesaid case was registered on the complaint of respondent No.2 namely, Vijay Kumar, which is pending for investigation. Meanwhile, petitioner and respondent No.2 have resolved all their disputes and the respondent No.2 is no more interested to pursue the case further against the petitioner.3. Respondent No.2 is p...
Vikas Kumar Vs. Food Corporation of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-07-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision : July 07, 2015 + LPA4162015 VIKAS KUMAR Represented by: ..... Appellant Dr.L.S.Chaudhary, Mr.Ajay Chaudhary, Ms.Pratibha Gupta, Advs. versus FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA Represented by: ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1. Aggrieved by the orders dated January 27, 2015 and March 02, 2015 dismissing the writ petition being W.P.(C)3631/2014 and the review petition filed by the appellant respectively, the appellant prefers the present appeal.2. In W.P.(C) 3631/2014 Vikas Kumar the appellant herein claimed that his father Surender Pal Singh while working with Food Corporation of India (in short the FCI) died in harness on November 18, 2001. At the time of his fathers death Vikas Kumar was a student and after passing out 12 th Class from U.P. Board of Education, Allahabad he made a representation to the FCI for appointment on compassionate grounds vide...
- ‹ Prev
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- Next ›
- Last »