Delhi Court July 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Harpal Singh Vs. Sonia Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-10-2015
* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Tr. P. (C) No.105/2014 Decided on :10. h July, 2015 Petitioner HARPAL SINGH Through: Mr. Rakesh Nautiyal, Advocate. Versus Respondent SONIA SINGH Through: Mr. Sanjeev Narang, Advocate with respondent in person. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition under Section 24 of the CPC for transfer of HMA No.1160/2014 titled Harpal Singh vs. Sonia Singh pending in the court of Sh. Pradeep Chadha, Principal Judge, Family Courts, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi to Family Court, Rohini (North-West District).2. The ground for transfer of this petition to Rohini courts, North- West district given by the petitioner in the petition is two-fold. It has been stated that firstly there are two cases which are pending in the district court, Rohini. The first case is pertaining to enhancement of maintenance under Section 25 (2) of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, which is pending in the court of Ms. Shilpi Jai...
Braham Prakash Vs. Union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-10-2015
$~23. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6513/2015 Judgment dated 10th July, 2015 % BRAHAM PRAKASH Through : ..... Petitioner Mr.Y.S. Chauhan, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through : ..... Respondents Mr.Vivek Goyal, CGSC, Mr.Dhirender Yadav and Mr.Vikramjeet, Advs. for respondents no.1 and 2. Mr.Sameer Agrawal, Adv. for respondents no.3 to 5. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) CM APPL. 11862/2015.1. Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.2. Application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 6513/2015 3. Present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to set aside the order dated 24.12.2014 passed by Central Administrative Tribunal by which the Original Application, being O.A.No.4271/2012, filed by the petitioner herein seeking to release his pay and allowances for the period 1.2.2007 to 27.7.2007 was dismissed.4. Counsel for the peti...
Delhi Voluntary Hospital Forum and Ors Vs. Ministry of Health and Fami ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-09-2015
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:09. 07.2015 W.P.(C) 1538/2013 & CM32122013 DELHI VOLUNTARY HOSPITAL FORUM & ORS ..... Petitioners versus MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE & ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners : Ms Mamta Tiwari and Mr Petal Chandhiok. For the Respondents : Mr Saqib and Ms Shipra Shukhla for R-1, 2 & 3. AND + W.P.(C) 2688/2013 & CM50732013 SUNDER LAL JAIN CHARITABLE HOSPITAL ..... Petitioner versus MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE & ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Ms Mamta Tiwari. For the Respondents : Mr Rajesh Gogna with Mr Arnab Naskar for R-1, 2 & 3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The present petitions have been filed impugning the Office Memorandum dated 07.02.2013 (hereinafter impugned OM) whereby the rates for treatment were reduced from `97,750/- to `50,000 in case of Coronary Angioplasty and from `9...
Jagjit Singh Oberoi Vs. Ranjeet Kaur and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-09-2015
$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision : July 09, 2015 + RFA(OS) 34/2015 JAGJIT SINGH OBEROI Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Sanjeev Singh, Advocate versus RANJEET KAUR & ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Mukul Sharma, Advocate for R-1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. Respondents No.2 and 3 have already been proceeded against ex- parte. We have heard learned counsel for the appellant and respondent No.1.2. A very short issue arises for consideration. Whether the learned Single Judge has correctly applied the law by enhancing sale consideration to be paid by the appellant by a further sum of `1,00,000,00/- (Rupees One Crore only) while decreeing the suit seeking specific performance of an agreement to sell dated March 18, 2007.3. We would be referring to the parties in the suit by their names because it would give clarity to our decision.4. Abnesh Kaur, impleaded as defendant ...
Sunder Lal Jain Charitable Hospital Vs. Ministry of Health and Family ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-09-2015
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:09. 07.2015 W.P.(C) 1538/2013 & CM32122013 DELHI VOLUNTARY HOSPITAL FORUM & ORS ..... Petitioners versus MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE & ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners : Ms Mamta Tiwari and Mr Petal Chandhiok. For the Respondents : Mr Saqib and Ms Shipra Shukhla for R-1, 2 & 3. AND + W.P.(C) 2688/2013 & CM50732013 SUNDER LAL JAIN CHARITABLE HOSPITAL ..... Petitioner versus MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE & ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Ms Mamta Tiwari. For the Respondents : Mr Rajesh Gogna with Mr Arnab Naskar for R-1, 2 & 3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The present petitions have been filed impugning the Office Memorandum dated 07.02.2013 (hereinafter impugned OM) whereby the rates for treatment were reduced from `97,750/- to `50,000 in case of Coronary Angioplasty and from `9...
Cottage Industries Exposition Ltd. Vs. Subhash Chander
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-09-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: July 03, 2015 Judgment Delivered on: July 09, 2015 + RFA(OS) 61/2015 COTTAGE INDUSTRIES EXPOSITION LTD ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Rakesh Tiku, Sr.Advocate instructed by Ms.Suruchi Mittal, Advocate versus SUBHASH CHANDER Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Ravi Gupta, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Asheesh Jain, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Allowing IA No.19681/2014 filed under Order XII Rule 6 of the Code of Civil Procedure filed by the respondent suit filed by the respondent against the appellant for possession of property bearing Municipal No.C-2/9, Safdarjung Development Area, New Delhi has been decreed. It is apparent that the decree has been passed on an admission by the appellant found by the learned Single Judge.2. Case pleaded by the respondent was that it was the perpetual lessee under a perpetual lease deed executed in its fa...
Rajesh Kumar and Anr. Vs. Harish Kataria and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-09-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:09. 07.2015 + RFA5542014 RAJESH KUMAR & ANR. ....Appellants Versus HARISH KATARIA & ORS. .....Respondents ADVOCATES WHO APPEARED IN THIS CASE: For the Appellant : Mr Sanjeev Sindhwani, Sr. Advocate with Mr Vijay Zaveri, Adv. For the Respondents : Mr Chaitanya Siddarth, Adv. for R-2. CORAM :HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J1 This is an appeal directed against the judgement and decree dated 14.08.2014, passed by learned Additional District Judge, Tis Hazari (Central), Delhi. 1.1 The appellants herein were the original plaintiffs in the suit filed by them for specific performance and permanent injunction. 1.2 By virtue of the impugned judgement, the learned ADJ has dismissed the suit filed by the appellants.2. In order to appreciate the challenge laid by the appellants, the following broad facts need to be noticed. 2.1 Respondent no.1/ original defendant no.1 had entered into an agreement to sell dated 27....
Pankaj Agarwal and Ors. Vs. Govt of Nct of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-09-2015
I- 2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:9. h July, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 641/2015 PANKAJ AGARWAL & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Adil Alvi, Advocate with petitioners in person versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Karan Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with ASI Rajneesh Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.207/2011, under Sections 498A/406/34 of the IPC, registered at police station Mayur Vihar, New Delhi is sought on the basis of affidavit of 27th January, 2015 of respondent No.2 and the joint statement of parties made on 16th May, 2014 before the matrimonial court. Mr. Karan Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question and she has been identified to be so by ASI Rajneesh on the basis of identity Crl.M.C.No.6...
Baba Joginder Singh Vs. Amandeep Kaur
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-09-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Delivered on:9. h July, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 4661/2014 & CM. No.15883/2014 BABA JOGINDER SINGH Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr. Jaswant Singh Komal and Mr. Maroof Ahmad, Advocates. with petitioner in person. Versus AMANDEEP KAUR Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr. Jatin Sehgal and Harish Malik, Advocates with respondent in person. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) CRL.M.C. 4661/2014 1. By way of this petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, petitioner has assailed the order dated 27.08.2014 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-03, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi in Criminal Appeal No.60/2014.2. Brief facts of the case, as averred in the present petition, are that the petitioner is a religious type of person and is running his Dera under the name of Nanak Dukh Bhanjan Satsang Ghar, Umarpura, Tehsil Raikot, District Ludhiana, Punjab, who married with the respondent on 01.03.200...
Anil Kumar Akarnia Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-09-2015
$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on :09. 07.2015 + W.P.(C) 2825/2012, C.M. NO.11/2013 ANIL KUMAR AKARNIA ..... Petitioner Through : Sh. Sreenivasa Rao. K, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through : Sh. Abhay Prakash Sahay, CGSC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % 1. The petitioners complaint is that his Annual Confidential Report (ACR) grading for the period 01.04.2005 to 24.10.2005 was wrongly recorded by the then Reporting Officer, i.e. the third respondent Sh. Ishwar Singh Duhan, who held the rank of Commandant, and that he was actuated by malice which vitiated the below average ACR grading, recorded and affirmed by the Reporting Officer and the Reviewing Officer.. He seeks appropriate directions for the quashing of such ACR.2. The petitioner was, at the relevant time, an Assistant Commandant. He had joined that post in the Indo-Tibetan Border Police (...
- ‹ Prev
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- Next ›
- Last »