Delhi Court July 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dtc and Anr. Vs. Suraj Mal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-09-2015
$~R-205 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % Date of Decision:09. 07.2015 RSA No.98 OF2011DTC & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Sarfaraz Khan, Advocate versus SURAJ MAL ..... Respondent Through: Mr. D.L.Sahni, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI VIPIN SANGHI, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. This second appeal has been preferred under Section 100 CPC to assail the judgment dated 05.02.2011 passed by Shri Vimal Kumar Yadav, Additional District Judge II (North), Delhi, in R.C.A. No.13/2010 titled, DTC and another Vs. Sh. Suraj Mal. By the impugned judgment, the first appeal preferred by the appellant-DTC, who was the defendant in the suit preferred by the respondent, was dismissed.2. The respondent was appointed as a conductor with effect from 01.04.1979 and was confirmed in the year 1979 itself. He was placed under suspension by the appellant-employer on 04.01.2001 while he was posted at Hari Nagar Depot. He was issued a charge-sheet dated 12.01.2001 by the appellant through ...
Nashrulla @ Babbla Vs. State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-09-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of judgment:09. 7.2015 Crl. Appeal No.910/2013 NASHRULLA @ BABBLA Appellant Through: Mr.S.B.Dandapani, Advocate. Versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) .Respondent Through: Mr.Pramod Saxena, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.(oral) 1. This appeal is directed against the impugned judgment and order of sentence dated 26.7.2011 and 02.8.2011 respectively wherein the appellant stands convicted under Sections 363 and 376 of the IPC. The maximum sentence awarded to him is RI10years besides fine for each of the two offences. The sentences were to run concurrently.2. On the complaint of Niranjan Shah (PW-6) the present FIR was registered. He was the father of the prosecutrix. The victim was examined as PW-4. Her brother was examined as PW-5. The mother of the victim was examined as PW-3. The doctors who had medically examined the victim and proved her MLC were examined as PW-2 and PW-8. MLC of the victim was pro...
Nisha Goel and Anr. Vs. Nct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-09-2015
$-5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Delivered on:9. h July, 2015 + CRL.M.C. No.3873/2014 NISHA GOEL & ANR. Represented by: ..... Petitioners Mr.Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate. Mr.Murari Tiwari and Mr. Rahul Kumar, Advocates for Petitioner No.2. Versus NCT OF DELHI & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Ms. Jasbir Kaur, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State with Inspector Jagminder Dahiya and SI Pukhraj Singh, P.S. Begumpur. Respondent No.3 in person. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.1. By way of this petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.557/2014 registered at Police Station Begumpur, for the offences punishable under Sections 420/468/471/120-B/506 IPC on 29.05.2014 and the consequential proceedings emanating therefrom against the petitioners.2. Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that the aforesaid case was registered on the complaint of respondent No.3, nam...
Ankit Tyagi Vs. State (Nct of Delhi) and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-09-2015
$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:9. h July, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 463/2015 ANKIT TYAGI Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sushil Kumar Singh, Advocate. Versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr. M.N. Dudeja, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State with Investigating Officer. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. This is a Petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, preferred by the petitioner for quashing of FIR No.32/2015 registered at Police Station Swaroop Nagar for the offence punishable under Section 363 IPC and consequential proceedings arising out of the same.2. The aforesaid FIR was registered on the complaint dated 16.01.2015 lodged by the father (respondent No.2) of the prosecutrix (respondent No.3) alleging kidnapping of the prosecutrix by the petitioner from his lawful guardianship, at that time she was aged only 17 years and six months and had married her witho...
Directorate of Adult Education Vs. Birender Kumar and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-09-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision : July 09, 2015 + LPA3502014 DIRECTORATE OF ADULT EDUCATION ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Anil Soni, Mr.Naginder, Advs. versus BIRENDER KUMAR & ORS Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Varun Prasad, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) CM78832014 For the reasons stated in the application 267 days delay in filing the appeal is condoned. LPA3502014 1. Vide the award dated March 24, 2008 the Labour Court held that termination of services of respondents Birender Kumar, Munish Sharma and Kuldeep Singh casual labourers with effect from September 17, 2002 was neither just nor fair nor legal and thus they were directed to be reinstated and regularized with 25% back wages. Against the said award the appellant preferred a writ petition being W.P.(C) 6360/2008 which was disposed of by the impugned order with the following directions:(i) The award of regularization of...
Shekhar Singh Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-09-2015
$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on :09. 07.2015 + W.P.(C) 3872/2014 SHEKHAR SINGH Petitioner Through: Sh. K.C. Mittal, Advocate. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..Respondents Through: Sh. Bhagwan Swarup Shukla, CGSC with Sh. Suyash Kumar, Advocate, for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3. Sh. S.S. Sejwal, Law Officer, CRPF. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % 1. The petitioner in these proceedings under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeks a direction to the second respondent (hereafter referred to as the CRPF) to issue a No Objection Certificate (hereafter referred to as the NOC) to him to facilitate his absorption within the Intelligence Bureau (IB).2. The brief facts are that the petitioner was enlisted with the CRPF on 05.04.1991. At the relevant time, he was working with the 126 th Batallion of the CRPF. He was selected for deputation with the IB with the approval of the CRPF. He r...
Sushil Kumar Vs. The State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-09-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON : MAY25 2015 DECIDED ON : JULY09 2015 + CRL.A. 159/2004 SUSHIL KUMAR ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Kamlesh Kumar, Advocate. versus THE STATE Through : ..... Respondent Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP. SI Pramod Kumar, Patel Nagar. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Challenge in this appeal is to a judgment dated 18.12.2003 of learned Additional Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.35/2000 emanating from FIR No.616/99 registered at Police Station Patel Nagar whereby the appellant-Sushil Kumar was convicted under Sections 363/366/376 IPC. By an order dated 22.12.2003, he was sentenced to undergo RI for three years with fine `1,000/- each under Sections 363/366 IPC and RI for seven years with fine `5,000/- under Section 376 IPC. The sentences were to operate concurrently.2. The prosecution case in brief is that on 28.08.1999 Ramdhari Yadav lodged complaint in the police station, Patel Nagar, informing that his daughter X (assumed name...
Master Shivraj Singh Through Father Sh. Yudhvir Si Vs. Govt. of Nct of ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-09-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:9. h July, 2015. % + W.P.(C) 2778/2015 & CM No.4979/2015 (for interim directions) MASTER SHIVRAJ SINGH THROUGH: FATHER SH. YUDHVIR SINGH ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. S.K. Sharma, Mr. Prayas Aneja, Mr. Rahul Sharma and Mr. Puneet Relan, Advs. Versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Gursharan Singh, Adv. for R-1. Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Kamal Mehta, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 The petitioner, an applicant for admission to the Pre-School / Primary Classes in the respondent No.2 Modern School, Vasant Vihar, New Delhi, in the academic year 2015-2016, has filed this petition seeking a mandamus to the respondent No.1 Directorate of Education (DoE), Govt. of NCT of Delhi (GNCTD) to ensure that the admission policy / criteria and guidelines framed by the respondent No.1 DoE and as uploaded by the respondent No.2 School on its website, are implemented in true sense a...
Nitin Kumar Vs. Staff Selection Commission
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-09-2015
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % DECIDED ON:09. 07.2015 + W.P. (C) 2888/2015 CM APPL.5180/2015, 6028/2015 NITIN KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Tarun Sharma with Ms. Boudh Prabha, Advocates. versus STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Bhagwan Swarup Shukla, CGSC with Mr. Jitendra Kumar Tripathi and Mr. Suyash Kumar, Advocates. Mr. J.P. Shukla, , Advocate for SSC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA S.RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. The writ petitioner seeks appropriate directions against the respondents for his appointment as Sub-Inspector (SI) in the Central Armed Police Force.2. The brief facts are that the petitioner participated in a common recruitment process for selection to the post of SI in Delhi Police and Central Armed Police Forces as well as Assistant Sub-Inspector in CISF. The examination was conducted in 2014. The controversy centres around the issue as to whether the petitioner possessed th...
Mohd. Saad Vs. Jamia Millia Islamia and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-09-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:9. h July, 2015. % + W.P.(C) 8293/2014 & CM No.19238/2014 (for stay) MOHD. SAAD Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sitab Ali Chaudhary and Mr. Gufran Ali, Advs. Versus JAMIA MILLIA ISLAMIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Amit George, Mr. Alamgir and Ms. Zeba Khair, Advs. for R-1 to 4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 The petitioner, an applicant for admission to the Master of International Business (MIB) course in the respondents No.1 to 4 Jamia Millia Islamia (University) in the academic year 2014-2015, in the Muslim Other Backward Classes (OBC) category, filed this petition on 5th November, 2014 impugning the non-grant of admission to him and grant of admission to one Mr. Ali Sher who had obtained 79.75 marks as against 80 marks scored by the petitioner, and seeking mandamus to the respondents No.1 to 4 University to admit the petitioner and allow him to attend the classes.2. However, the said Mr. Ali Sher was ...
- ‹ Prev
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- Next ›
- Last »