Delhi Court July 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ms. Pallavi Sharma Vs. College of Vocational Studies and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-06-2015
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:6. h July, 2015 % + W.P.(C) No.6398/2015 Ms. PALLAVI SHARMA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. R.K. Saini & Mr. Ayush Arora, Advs. versus COLLEGE OF VOCATIONAL STUDIES & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Adv. for University of Delhi. CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW CM No.11661/2015 (for exemption).1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions.2. The CM stands disposed of. W.P.(C) No.6398/2015 & CM No.11660/2015 (for stay).3. This petition has been received post lunch on listing on urgent mentioning and has been taken up past 1630 hours.4. In view of the urgency expressed, of the admissions closing tomorrow i.e. 7th July, 2015 by 1300 hours, the counsel for the petitioner has been heard.5. The petition is filed impugning the action of the respondent no.1 College of Vocational Studies and the respondent no.2 University of Delhi of refusing to give admission to the petitioner against the vacant seats of B.A. ...
Joginder Singh and Ors. Vs. The State ( Govt of Nct Delhi) and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-06-2015
$~52 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:6. h July, 2015 + CRL.M.C.No.2642/2015 JOGINDER SINGH & ORS. Represented by: ..... Petitioners Mr. Amit Kumar and Mr. Gagan Chawla, Advocates with all the Petitioners in person. Versus THE STATE ( GOVT OF NCT DELHI) & ANR. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr. Neeraj Kumar, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State with SI Ram Bhav, P.S. Khyala. Respondent No.2 in person alongwith her Father and daughter Gurmahak. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) Crl. M.A. No.9438/2015 (for exemption) Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Accordingly, the application is allowed. + CRL.M.C. 2642/2015 1. By way of this petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.371/2013 registered at Police Station Khyala for the offences punishable under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC on 10.09.2013 and the consequential proceedings emanating therefrom...
Rajinder Kumar Aggarwal Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-06-2015
$~44 THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:06. 07.2015 W.P.(C) 2395/2015 & CM42932015 RAJINDER KUMAR AGGARWAL ... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner For the Respondent DDA For the Respondent L&B/LAC : Mr S.K. Gupta with Mr R.K. Gupta : Mr Sanjeev Sabharwal : Mr Sidharth Panda CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The counter affidavit handed over by Mr Panda on behalf of respondent Nos. 2, 3 and 4 is taken on record. The learned counsel for the petitioner does not wish to file any rejoinder affidavit inasmuch as all the necessary averments are contained in the writ petition.2. By way of this writ petition the petitioner seeks the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the201. Ac...
Deepak Gupta Vs. Government of Nct of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-06-2015
$~38 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:06. 07.2015 W.P.(C) 2212/2015 & CM39742015 DEEPAK GUPTA ... Petitioner ... Respondents versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS Advocates who appeared in this case:- For the Petitioners : Mr Rajiv Kumar Ghawana For the Respondent Nos. 1&2 : Mr Sanjay K. Pathak with Mr S.K. Jha For the Respondent 3 (DDA) : Mr Arjun Pant CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The counter-affidavit handed over by Mr Pathak on behalf of the respondents 1 & 2 is taken on record. The learned counsel for the petitioner does not wish to file any rejoinder affidavit inasmuch as he would be relying on the averments made in the writ petition.2. The petitioner seeks the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) which came into e...
Prempal Singh Mathur and Ors. Vs. State (Nct Delhi) and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-06-2015
$~31 & 37 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: July 06, 2015 + (i) CRL.M.C. 2638/2015 & Crl.M.A.9430/2015 PREMPAL SINGH MATHUR & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Adarsh Saini, Advocate versus STATE (NCT DELHI) & ORS .....Respondents Through: Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI S.P. Singh and ACP R.K. Rathee Respondents No.2 & 3 in person + (ii) CRL.M.C. 2650/2015 & Crl.M.A.9455/2015 NARESH KUMAR & ORS Through: .....Petitioners Mr. Adarsh Saini, Advocate versus % STATE (NCT DELHI) & ORS .....Respondents Through: Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Raj Kumar and ACP R.K. Rathee Respondents No.2 to 5 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) In the above captioned two petitions, quashing of cross FIRs i.e. CRL.M.Cs. 2638 & 2650 of 2015 Page 1 FIR No.456/2014 under Sections 323/341/452 of IPC [in CRL.M.C. 2638/2015]. and FIR No.908/2014 registered under Sections 3 (1) ...
M/S Flash Properties Private Limited Vs. Union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-06-2015
$~14 THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:06. 07.2015 W.P.(C) 7902/2014 M/S FLASH PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED ... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Bharat Beriwal For the Respondent No.1 : Mr B.S. Shukla and Mr Vinod Tiwari For the Respondent Nos. 2&3: Mr Yeeshu Jain and Ms Jyoti Tyagi For the Respondent No.4 : Mr Rajat Agnihotri for Mr Manu Mridul CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The counter affidavit handed over by Mr Yeeshu Jain, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent Nos. 2 and 3, is taken on record. The learned counsel for the petitioner does not wish to file any rejoinder affidavit inasmuch as all the necessary averments are contained in the writ petition.2. By way of this writ petition the petitioner seeks the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and ...
Shankar Khandelwal Vs. The State (Nct of Delhi) and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-06-2015
$~34 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: July 06, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 2644/2015 SHANKAR KHANDELWAL ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Kamal Pundir and Ms. Rani Tiwari, Advocates versus THE STATE ( NCT OF DELHI) & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr.P.K. Mishra, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Amit Dutt Respondents No.2 & 3 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.187/2013, under Sections 290/304-A of IPC registered at police station Gandhi Nagar, Delhi is sought on the basis of affidavits of respondents No.2 & 3, parents of the deceased. Notice. Mr. P.K. Mishra, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and submits that respondent No.2Sharafat Khan and respondent No.3-Shabnam, present in the Court, have been identified to be the parents of the deceased by SI Amit Dutt on the basis of identity proof produced by them. CRL.M.C. 2644/2015 Page 1 Respondents No.2 & 3, present in ...
Krishan Kant Gupta and Ors. Vs. State Nct of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-06-2015
I- 23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:6. h July, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 2621/2015 & Crl.M.A.No.9361/2015 KRISHAN KANT GUPTA & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Satish Bajaj, Advocate versus STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with WSI Anita Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.92/2011, under Sections 498-A/406/34 of the IPC, registered at police station Uttam Nagar, New Delhi is sought on the basis of mediated settlement of 11th November, 2013 (Annexure-B) and on the ground that petitioner No.1- husband and respondent No.2 wife are happily living together since November, 2014. Notice. Ms. Nishi Jain, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, has been identified to be the complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question by WSI Anita ...
Mohit Yadav Vs. State of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-06-2015
I- 33 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:6. h July, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 2641/2015 & Crl.M.A.No.9437/2015 MOHIT YADAV Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Lokesh Kumar, Advocate versus STATE OF DELHI & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Naveen Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with SI Rajeev Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.795/2015, under Section 308/34 of the IPC, registered at police station Ashok Nagar, Delhi is sought on the basis of Compromise Deed of 3rd July, 2015 and on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR now stands cleared between the parties. Notice. Mr. Naveen Sharma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question and he has been identified to be so by SI Rajeev on the basis of identity proof Crl.M.C....
Naresh Kumar and Ors. Vs. State (Nct Delhi) and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-06-2015
$~31 & 37 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: July 06, 2015 + (i) CRL.M.C. 2638/2015 & Crl.M.A.9430/2015 PREMPAL SINGH MATHUR & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Adarsh Saini, Advocate versus STATE (NCT DELHI) & ORS .....Respondents Through: Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI S.P. Singh and ACP R.K. Rathee Respondents No.2 & 3 in person + (ii) CRL.M.C. 2650/2015 & Crl.M.A.9455/2015 NARESH KUMAR & ORS Through: .....Petitioners Mr. Adarsh Saini, Advocate versus % STATE (NCT DELHI) & ORS .....Respondents Through: Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Raj Kumar and ACP R.K. Rathee Respondents No.2 to 5 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) In the above captioned two petitions, quashing of cross FIRs i.e. CRL.M.Cs. 2638 & 2650 of 2015 Page 1 FIR No.456/2014 under Sections 323/341/452 of IPC [in CRL.M.C. 2638/2015]. and FIR No.908/2014 registered under Sections 3 (1) ...
- ‹ Prev
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- Next ›
- Last »