Delhi Court July 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S Saumya Mining Ltd. and Ors. Vs. M/S S.E. Investments Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-10-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % OMP No.308/2015 10th July, 2015 M/S SAUMYA MINING LTD. & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Rudrajyoti Nath Ray, Adv. and Mr. Amit Bikram Das, Adv. versus M/S S.E. INVESTMENTS LTD. Through: ..... Respondent Mr. P.Nagesh, Adv. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This is a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (in short the Act) impugning the Award dated 1.12.2014.2. I need not go into the merits of the matter in detail inasmuch as, the Award which is challenged is a consent Award and against a consent Award no objections can be filed under Section 34 of the Act.3. The facts of the case are that the respondent herein had given a loan to the petitioner no.1 and in such transaction the other petitioners stood as guarantors. The loan granted was for a sum of Rs.5 crores and on various defaults having occurred, respondent for seeking paym...
Anil Shandilya and Ors. Vs. The State ( Govt of Nct of Delhi) and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-10-2015
$~52 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:10. h July, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 2709/2015 ANIL SHANDILYA & ORS. Represented by: ..... Petitioners Mr. Raghunath Menon, Advocate. Versus THE STATE ( GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Ms. Jasbir Kaur, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State with SI Mukesh Yadav, PS Anand Vihar. Mr. Ravi Kapoor, Advocate for Respondents No.2 & 3 with Respondent No.3 in person. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) Crl. M.A.9701/2015 (for exemption) Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Accordingly, the application is allowed. CRL.M.C. 2709/2015 1. By way of this petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.158/2013 registered at Police Station Anand Vihar for the offences punishable under Sections 406/420/467/471 IPC on 23.04.2013 and the consequential proceedings emanating therefrom against the petitioners on ...
Deepak Rohilla Vs. Govt of Nct of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-10-2015
$~51 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:10. h July, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 2708/2015 DEEPAK ROHILLA Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr. Manohar Lal, Advocate. Versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr. M.N.Dudeja, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State with SI Ashok Kumar, P.S. Najafgarh. Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) Crl. M.A.9698/2015 (for exemption) Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Accordingly, the application is allowed. CRL.M.C. 2708/2015 1. By way of this petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.424/2014 registered at Police Station Najafgarh for the offences punishable under Sections 365/323/506/34 IPC and the consequential proceedings emanating therefrom against the petitioner on the ground that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties.2. Learned Counsel appearing...
Govind @ Suraj and Ors. Vs. State (Nct of Delhi) and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-10-2015
$~48 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:10. h July, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 2696/2015 GOVIND @ SURAJ & ORS. ..... Petitioners Represented by: In person. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr. M.N. Dudeja, APP for State. Mr. Pankaj Kr. Dubey, Adv. for R2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) Crl. M.A.9734/2015 (for exemption) Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Accordingly, the application is allowed. + CRL.M.C. 2696/2015 1. Vide the present petition, petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.165/2006 registered at PS-Saraswati Vihar for the offences punishable under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC.2. It is averred in the instant petition that the aforesaid case was registered on the complaint of respondent No.2, namely Smt. Neha and after the investigation of the case, police has filed the chargesheet. Charges have been framed against the petitioners and the case is pending for prosecution evidence. Thereaf...
Sachin Mittal and Ors Vs. Nct of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-10-2015
$~49 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:10. h July, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 2700/2015 SACHIN MITTAL & ORS .... Petitioners Represented by: Mr. Pranab Prakash, Adv. versus NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr. Neeraj Kr. Singh, APP for State with SI Neeraj Tarar, PS-Mandawali. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) Crl. M.A.9670/2015 (for exemption) Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Accordingly, the application is allowed. + CRL.M.C. 2700/2015 1. Vide the present petition; petitioners seek quashing of FIR NO.248/2009 registered at PS-Mandawali for the offences punishable under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC against the petitioners.2. Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that the aforesaid case was registered on the complaint of respondent No.2. After investigation, the chargesheet has been filed and the charges are yet to be framed in the instant case. Meanwhile, good sense prevailed and resp...
Pran Kumar Kaul Vs. Indian Overseas Bank and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-10-2015
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision : July 10, 2015 + LPA4262015 PRAN KUMAR KAUL Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.D.S.Chauhan, Advocate with Ms.Ruchi Singh, Advocate versus INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK & ORS ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Karan Khanna, Advocate for R-1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) CM No.11861/2015 Allowed subject to just exceptions. LPA No.426/2015 1. The charge against the appellant reads as under:Articles of Charge : You had contravened Regulations 3(1) and 3(3) of Indian Overseas Bank Officer Employees (Conduct) Regulations 1976, a breach of which would amount to misconduct in terms of Regulation 24 thereof. The said Regulations are extracted below:3.1) Every officer employee shall, at all times take all possible steps to ensure and protect the interests of the bank and discharge his duties with utmost integrity, honesty, devotion and diligence and do nothing wh...
Shah Alah and Ors. Vs. State (Nct of Delhi) and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-10-2015
$~46 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:10. h July, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 2690/2015 SHAH ALAH & ORS. ..... Petitioners Represented by: Ms. Manjeet Arya and Mr. Narender Kr. Sharma, Advs. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr. Neeraj Kr. Singh, APP for State with SI Rajiv Kumar, PSJait Pur. Mr. Trilok Chand, Adv. for R2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) Crl. M.A.9635/2015 (for exemption) Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Accordingly, the application is allowed. + CRL.M.C. 2690/2015 1. Vide the present petition, petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.307/2014 registered at PS-Jaitpur for the offences punishable under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC with emanating proceedings arising out of the said FIR.2. Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that the aforesaid case was registered on the complaint of respondent No.2. Thereafter, respondent No.2 has resolved all her disputes wit...
Dr. Ram Avtar Garg Vs. Medical Council of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-10-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:13. h April, 2015 Date of Decision:10. h July, 2015 % + W.P.(C) 4220/2011 DR. RAM AVTAR GARG Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Arun K. Sharma, Advocate with petitioner in person. versus MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. T. Singhdev, Advocate for R-1. R-2 in person. Mr. Praveen Khattar, Advocate for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VED PRAKASH VAISH JUDGMENT1 By way of present petition the petitioner impugns order dated 18.05.2011 passed by Ethics Committee of Medical Council of India whereby the quantum of punishment was enhanced from warning as issued by Delhi Medical Council vide order dated 07.12.2010 to three months removal of the name of the petitioner from the Indian Medical Register/ State Medical Register.2. The facts as culled out from the petition are that a child patient, namely, Samiksha was brought to the casualty of Holy Family Hospital, Okhla, New Delhi at around 8:00 p.m. on 04.12.2009. The c...
Anil Yadav Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-10-2015
$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: July 10, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 3642/2013 ANIL YADAV ..... Petitioner Through: In person versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Navin Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with SI Vijay Maan Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.54/2011 under Section 328 of IPC registered at P.S. Lahori Gate, Delhi is sought on the basis of affidavit of respondent No.2. Upon notice, Mr. Navin Sharma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, appears for respondent-State and submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, has been identified to be the complainant/firstinformant of the FIR in question by SI Vijay Maan on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State submits that trial in this case has not yet started and stomach wash of respondent CRL.M.C. 3642/2013 Page 1 No.2 was not taken as respondent N...
Satya Narayan and Ors. Vs. State (Nct of Delhi) and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-10-2015
I- 30 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:10. h July, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 2693/2015 & Crl.M.A.No.9646-47/2015 SATYA NARAYAN & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. D.C. Narnolia, Advocate versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with ASI Rajneesh Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.178/2007, under Sections 498-A/406/34 of the IPC, registered at police station Najafgarh, Delhi is sought in this petition. Notice. Mr. Amit Ahlawat, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question and she has been identified to be so by ASI Rajneesh on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for State submits on Crl.M.C.No.2693/2015 Page 1 instructions that the trial...
- ‹ Prev
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- Next ›
- Last »