Delhi Court July 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
S.S. Mota Singh Jr. Model School Vs. Tanjeet Kaur and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-07-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on July 1, 2015 Judgment delivered on July 7, 2015 + W.P.(C) 6284/2012 S.S. MOTA SINGH. JR. MODEL SCHOOL Through: ..... Petitioner Mr.Siddharth Yadav and Mr.Washim Ashruf, Advs. versus TANJEET KAUR AND ANR Through: ..... Respondents Mr. K. Venkatraman, Adv. for R2 with Dr.Balesh Kumari, Dy. Education Officer CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.1. The challenge in this Writ Petition is to the order dated August, 9 2012 passed by the Delhi School Tribunal (Tribunal in short) in an Appeal filed under Section 8 (3) of the Delhi School Education Act, 1973 by the respondent No.1. The Facts 2. The respondent No.1 was initially appointed on a consolidated salary of Rs.5,000/- per month on August 16, 2006. She was placed on probation w.e.f July 1, 2008. Two memos were issued to the respondent No.1 on December 23, 2008 and July 27, 2009 wherein it was pointed out that she has not performed her duties properly and...
Mukesh Kumar Gupta Vs. Surendra Kumar Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-07-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: July 07, 2015 + RFA(OS) 63/2015 MUKESH KUMAR GUPTA Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Vijay Sansawal and Mr.Amitesh Gaurav, Advocates. versus SURENDRA KUMAR GUPTA Represented by: ..... Respondent None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) CM Nos.11502/2015 (additional documents) & 11503/2015 (Directions) 1. By these applications under Order XLI Rule 27 CPC and Order XI Rule 12 and 14 read with Section 151 CPC Mukesh Kumar Gupta, the Appellant inter alia prays that he was granted No Objection Certificate for installation of separate electricity connection and despite due diligence he has now been able to find those documents and that he is also in possession of the rent receipts deposited by him to the Rent Controller, South and they be permitted to be placed on record.2. In CM No.11503/2015 he further prays that the Respondent be directed to produce all the docume...
Manoj Jain Vs. Anand Kumar Jain and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-07-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL. REV.P. 571/2013, CRL.M.(BAIL) 2046/2013, CRL.M.A Nos. 9772/2013 & 1618/2015 Reserved on:03. 07.2015 Date of Decision:07.07.2015 % MANOJ JAIN ..... Appellant Through: Dr. Ashwani Bhardwaj, Adv. Versus ANAND KUMAR JAIN & ANR ..... Respondent Through: Mr. S.K. Jain & Ms. Khushboo Bhardwaj, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J:1. The Petitioner impugns the judgment and order of conviction dated 25.02.2012/28.02.2012 passed by the Ld. Trial Court in Complaint case No.11/08/12 whereby the Petitioner was convicted for the offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 and was sentenced to undergo Simple Imprisonment for a period of one year and to pay a fine, with a default clause of Rs. 3 lakhs out of which Rs.2.50 lakhs to be paid to the Respondent as compensation, or suffer Simple Imprisonment for 2 months, as well as the Appellate Court judgment passed in Criminal Appeal No.5/2012 on 30.08.2013 whi...
Ajay Vs. State (Nct of Delhi) and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-07-2015
I- 23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:7. h July, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 2655/2015 & Crl.M.A.No.9498-99/2015 AJAY Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. D.K. Singh, Advocate versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Karan Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with SI Babu Lal Mr. Rohit Gupta & Mrs. Shrey Chathly, Advocates with respondent No.2-in-person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.438/2015, under Section 308 of the IPC, registered at police station R.K. Puram, New Delhi is sought in this petition on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR now stands cleared between the parties. Notice. Mr. Karan Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and Mr. Rohit Gupta, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState submits Crl.M.C.No.2655/2015 Page 1 that respondent...
Barham Prakash and Anr. Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-07-2015
I-13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:7. h July, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 711/2013 BARHAM PRAKASH &ANR. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Siddharth, Advocate versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Praveen Bhati, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with ASI Raju Yadav Respondent No.2 in person: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.167/2008, under Sections 419/420/467/468/ 471/120B of the IPC, registered at police station Adarsh Nagar, Delhi is sought in this petition. Notice. Mr. Parveen Bhati, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question and he has been identified to be so by ASI Raju Yadav on the basis of identity proof produced by him. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State submits that the FIR in question pertains to a landlord- Crl.M...
Vishnu Sharma @ Sonu Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-07-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON : MAY27 2015 DECIDED ON : JULY07 2015 + CRL.A.996/2014 VISHNU SHARMA @ SONU ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Pramod K.Dueby with Mr.Shiv Chopra and Ms.Neha, Advocates. VERSUS STATE Through : ..... Respondent Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. The appellant-Vishnu Sharma @ Sonu impugns a judgment dated 06.12.2013 in Sessions Case No.117/13 arising out of FIR No.19/2013 registered at Police Station Bharat Nagar by which he was convicted under Section 307/324 IPC. By an order 14.12.2013 he was awarded RI for four years with fine `2,000.2. Briefly stated the prosecution case as reflected in the charge- sheet was that on 18.01.2013 at about 07:30 p.m. at Jhuggi No.N-31/1, Back Side Shakti Apartment, Ashok Vihar, Phase-II, Delhi, the appellant and his associate Nitin (since expired) outraged modesty of X (assumed name) aged 17 years. She reported the incident to her aunt Kamal Yadav who took her to husband...
Shiv Shanker Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-07-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment :07th July, 2015 % + CRL.A. 785/2012 SHIV SHANKER Through versus ..... Appellant Mr.Neeraj Bhardwaj, Advocate. STATE Through ..... Respondent Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP for the State. With + CRL.A. 944/2013 GEETA Through ..... Appellant Mr.Jatin Rajput and Mr Anupam Dubey, Advocates. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through ..... Respondent Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.(Oral) 1. These are two appeals filed by Shiv Shankar and Geeta impugning the judgment and order on sentence dated 12.12.2011 and 21.12.2011 respectively wherein the appellant Shiv Shankar had been convicted for the offence under Sections 376/366/34 of the IPC and had been sentenced to undergo a maximum incarceration of RI7years besides fine for each of the two offences. Appellant Geeta had been convicted for the offence under Section 376/366 read with Section 109 of the IPC and had also been sentenced to a p...
Manoj Jain Vs. Surinder Kumar Jain and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-07-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL. REV.P. 570/2013, CRL.M.(BAIL) 2045/2013, CRL.M.A Nos. 16098/2013 & 1619/2015 Reserved on:03. 07.2015 Date of Decision:07.07.2015 % MANOJ JAIN ..... Appellant Through: Dr. Ashwani Bhardwaj, Adv. Versus SURINDER KUMAR JAIN & ANR ..... Respondent Through: Mr. S.K. Jain & Ms. Khushboo Bhardwaj, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J:1. The Petitioner impugns the judgment and order of conviction dated 25.02.2012/28.02.2012 passed by the Ld. Trial Court in Complaint case No.36/08/12 whereby the Petitioner was convicted for the offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 and was sentenced to undergo Simple Imprisonment for a period of one year and to pay a fine, with a default clause, of Rs. 3 lakhs out of which Rs.2.50 lakhs to be paid to the Respondent as compensation or suffer Simple Imprisonment for 2 months, as well as the Appellate Court judgment passed in Criminal Appeal No.4/2012 on 30.08.2013...
M/S Kashmiri Lal Surinder Kumar Vs. M/S Veer Bhan Ramesh Kumar and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-07-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % CS(OS) No.226/2006 7th July, 2015 M/S KASHMIRI LAL SURINDER KUMAR Through: ..... Plaintiff Mr. Madhur Sapra, Adv. versus M/S VEER BHAN RAMESH KUMAR & ORS Through: ..... Defendants Mr. Vivekananda, Adv. for D-2 and D3 CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. Yes VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. Plaintiff/M/s Kashmiri Lal Surinder Kumar has filed the suit for recovery of Rs.20,55,000/- against three defendants. Defendant No.1 as per the plaint is a partnership firm called as M/s Veer Bhan Ramesh Kumar . Defendant no.2 Sh. Ramesh Kumar Sachdeva and defendant no.3 Sh. Jitender Kumar Sachdeva are stated to be partners of the defendant no.1/Firm.2. As per the plaint the plaintiff firm is carrying on the business of selling of fruits and vegetables, including, as an agent thereof. It is stated in the plaint that defendant no.1 through defendant nos.2 and 3 had been purchasing fruits and vegetables from the plai...
Naresh Kumar Vs. State of Nct of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-07-2015
$~28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: July 07, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 2664/2015 & Crl.M.A.9529/2015 NARESH KUMAR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sanjay Aggarwal, Advocate versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Navin Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with SI Sandeep Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.702/2007, under Section 498-A of IPC registered at police station Rohini, Delhi is sought on the basis of Settlement of 3rd February, 2011 (Annexure P-3 Colly.) and on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR now stands cleared between the parties. Notice. Mr. Navin Shamra, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, has been identified to be the complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question by SI Sandeep on the basis of identity proof pro...
- ‹ Prev
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- Next ›
- Last »