Delhi Court July 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Avinash Tripathi Vs. Union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-06-2015
$~10-13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % DECIDED ON:06. 07.2015 + W.P. (C) 12596/2009, CM APPL.15601/2013, 13167/2009 AVINASH TRIPATHI ..... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents W.P. (C) 12704/2009, CM APPL.13395/2009, 2512/2010 ..... Petitioner SUNIL KUMAR versus UOI AND ORS ..... Respondents W.P. (C) 2836/2013, CM APPL.15600/2013 AJIT KUMR BIBHUTI ..... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS ..... Respondents W.P. (C) 5714/2013, CM APPL.12637/2013, 15245/2013 KESHAV KUMAR AGARWAL versus UOI AND ORS ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents Appearance: Mr. J.K. Singh, Advocate for petitioner in W.P.(C)12704/2009. Mrs. Bharathi Raju, CGSC for UOI/R-1-3 in W.P.(C)12704/2009. Mr. Yogender Mishra, Advocate for applicants in W.P.(C) 12596/2009, W.P.(C)2836/2013 & W.P.(C) 5714/2013. Mr. Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC for UOI in W.P.(C)2836/2013. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA S.RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. The petition...
Indosolar Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-03-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:14. 05.2015 Judgment delivered on:03. 07.2015 % + WP(C) No.3625/2013 INDOSOLAR LTD. ..... Petitioner Versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner: Dr. Ashwani Kumar, Sr. Advocate with Mr Ashish Kumar, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr Jasmeet Singh, CGSC with Mr Srivats Kaushal, Ms Kritika Mehra & Ms Astha Sharma, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J1The petitioner, is essentially aggrieved by the non-denial of subsidy to it by the respondents, under a scheme which is titled as :Special Incentive Package Scheme (in short the Scheme). 1.1 This scheme was notified by respondent no.1, to encourage, investments for setting up semi-conductor fabrication, and other micro and nano technology manufacturing industries, in India. 1.2 Since, the industry is supposedly capital intensive, and is required to frequently adapt to technological chang...
Delhi Gram Vikas Panchayat Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-03-2015
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:3. d July, 2015 + W.P.(C) No.7914/2012 DELHI GRAM VIKAS PANCHAYAT Through: Mr. N.S. Dalal, Adv. ..... Petitioner Versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha and Mr. Kushal Raj, Advs. for R-1/GNCTD. Mr. Arun Birbal and Mr. Sanjay Singh, Advs. for R-2/DDA. Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. for R3/UOI. CORAM:HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J1 This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, filed as a Public Interest Litigation (PIL), flags the issue of delays on the part of the respondent no.1, Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi (GNCTD), in processing the applications (of those whose land was acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894) under the Scheme framed by the Govt. of NCT of Delhi of providing alternative land as well as the delays on the part of the respondent no.2 Delhi Development Auth...
Bptp Limited Vs. Cpi India I Limited and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-03-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ARB.A. 8/2015 & IA No.3496/2015 Reserved on: May 25, 2015 Decision on: July 3, 2015 BPTP LIMITED Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Ciccu Mukhopadhya, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Kaushik Poddar, Advocate. versus CPI INDIA I LIMITED & ORs. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Bindi Dave and Mr. Aman Gandhi, Advocates for Respondent No1. AND + O.M.P. 79/2015 CPI INDIA I LTD Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Bindi Dave and Mr. Aman Gandhi, Advocates. versus BPTP LTD AND OTHERS Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Amit Sibal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Kaushik Poddar and Mr. Vivek Raja, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUDGMENT % 03.07.2015 1. Arbitration Appeal No.8 of 2015 by BPTP Ltd. (BPTP) is directed against an order dated 5th January 2015 passed by the Appellate Tribunal (AT) in an application filed by CPI India I Ltd. (CPI) under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Ac...
Government of Nct of Delhi Vs. Jangli Ram and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-03-2015
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:3. d July, 2015 % + LPA1122015 GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Biraja Mahapatra, Adv. Versus JANGLI RAM & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sudhanshu Tomar, Adv. CORAM :HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J1 This intra-court appeal impugns the judgment dated 3rd September, 2014 of the learned Single Judge allowing W.P.(C) No.5105/2013 preferred by the respondent No.1 (respondent No.2 is the Delhi Development Authority) by directing the appellant to decide the application of the respondent No.1 / writ petitioner for allotment of alternative residential plot in lieu of acquired land as per his eligibility within two months thereof and to communicate decision thereof to the respondent No.1 / writ petitioner.2. Notice of the appeal was issued. We heard the counsel for the appellant and the counsel for the respondent No.1 / writ petitioner on 24th April, 2015 and...
Cpi India I Ltd Vs. Bptp Ltd and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-03-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ARB.A. 8/2015 & IA No.3496/2015 Reserved on: May 25, 2015 Decision on: July 3, 2015 BPTP LIMITED Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Ciccu Mukhopadhya, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Kaushik Poddar, Advocate. versus CPI INDIA I LIMITED & ORs. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Bindi Dave and Mr. Aman Gandhi, Advocates for Respondent No1. AND + O.M.P. 79/2015 CPI INDIA I LTD Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Bindi Dave and Mr. Aman Gandhi, Advocates. versus BPTP LTD AND OTHERS Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Amit Sibal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Kaushik Poddar and Mr. Vivek Raja, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUDGMENT % 03.07.2015 1. Arbitration Appeal No.8 of 2015 by BPTP Ltd. (BPTP) is directed against an order dated 5th January 2015 passed by the Appellate Tribunal (AT) in an application filed by CPI India I Ltd. (CPI) under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Ac...
Union of India Vs. Sunita Devi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-03-2015
$~23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO1952015 UNION OF INDIA ..... Appellant Through: Ms Shipra Shukla, Adv. versus % SUNITA DEVI & ORS ..... Respondents Through CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER ORDER0307.2015 1. This is an appeal filed against the judgement dated 24.03.2015, passed by the Railway Claims Tribunal, Principal Bench, Delhi (in short the Tribunal).2. Learned counsel for the appellant, in the course of her submission, has submitted that there are two errors in the judgement. First, that the Tribunal has failed to take into account the Divisional Railway Managers (DRM) report, wherein a conclusion was reached, after an inquiry, that the deceased Balwan Singh, had entered the railway premises in an illegal manner and, thus, was run-over. Second, that the deceased Balwan Singh was not a bonafide traveller, in as much as, he did not carry a railway ticket. Incidentally, this aspect also finds a mention in the DRM report.3. In order to appreciate the two c...
Ravinder Bansal and Ors. Vs. State (Through Nct of Delhi) and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-03-2015
I-41 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:3. d July, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 2616/2015 RAVINDER BANSAL & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. T.C. Sharma, Advocate versus STATE (THROUGH NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. .. Respondents Through: Mr. Navin Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with WSI Renu Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.438/2013, under Sections 498-A/406/34 of the IPC, registered at police station Sarai Rohilla, Delhi is sought on the basis of mediated settlement of 1st October, 2014 (Annexure-D), arrived at Delhi Government Mediation & Conciliation Centre, Delhi Disputes Resolution Society (Regd.), Delhi. Notice. Mr. Navin Sharma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question and she has been identified to be so by WSI Renu on the basis of identity...
Saroj Arora and Ors Vs. Mohinder Pal and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-03-2015
26 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 506/2015 SAROJ ARORA & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Ms. Deepika V. Marwaha, Advocate. versus MOHINDER PAL & ORS Through: None. ..... Respondents Date of Decision :3. d July, 2015 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) CM Appl. 11361/2015 (exemption) in Cont.Cas(C) 506/2015 Allowed, subject to just exceptions. Cont.Cas(C) 506/2015 1. Petitioners allege non-compliance of the order dated 27th April, 2015 passed in FAO3202010 and CM(M) 1105/2010 inasmuch as the monthly payments stipulated in the said order have not been paid to the present petitioners.2. Learned counsel for petitioners also states that even arrears of payments as stipulated in the said order have not been paid. The relevant portion of the order on the basis of which the present contempt petition has been filed is reproduced hereinbelow:45. I accordingly direct that from the date of application till the date of passing of this order,...
Brij Pal Sharma and Ors. Vs. The State (Nct of Delhi) and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-03-2015
I- 32 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:3. d July, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 2600/2015 & Crl.M.A.No.9283/2015 BRIJ PAL SHARMA & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Ram Kishan, Advocate versus THE STATE ( NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Parveen Bhati, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with SI Rakesh Rana Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocate with respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.211/2010, under Sections 498-A/406/34 of the IPC, registered at police station Bharat Nagar , Delhi is sought in this petition. Notice. Mr. Parveen Bhati, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant/first- Crl.M.C.No.2600/2015 Page 1 informant of the FIR in question and she has been identified ...
- ‹ Prev
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- Next ›
- Last »