Delhi Court July 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Municipal Corporation of Delhi Vs. Bharat Overseas P. Ltd. and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-09-2015
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:9. h July, 2015 % + RFA No.368/2004 MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI .... Appellant Through: Ms. Biji Rajesh, Adv. for Mr. Gaurang Kanth, Adv. Versus BHARAT OVERSEAS P. LTD. & ANR. Through: None. CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW ..... Respondents RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J1 This appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 impugns the judgment and decree dated 23rd March, 2003 of the Additional District Judge (ADJ), Delhi, of dismissal of Suit No.273/03/80 filed by the appellant for recovery of a sum of Rs.9,25,000/- jointly and severally from the respondent No.1 Bharat Overseas Pvt. Ltd. (BOPL) and from the respondent No.2 Jaipur Udyog Limited (JUL).2. Notice of the appeal was issued. Only the respondent No.2 JUL appeared in pursuance thereto. The appeal was admitted for hearing on 2 nd March, 2005. RFA No.368/2004 ordinary way and on the application of the appellant Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD...
Mohd. Quamuddin and Ors. Vs. Union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-08-2015
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:08. 07.2015 W.P.(C) 8528/2008 MOHD. QUAMUDDIN & ORS. .....Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners : Ms Aruna Mehta with Mr Sanjeev Mehta. For the Respondent : Mr Jagjit Singh and Mr Shivanshu Bajpai. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioners are parents of children - Najruddin, aged about 11 years; Sajruddin, aged about 10 years; Saddam, aged about 14 years; and Arun, aged about 11 years - who were run over by a train and have filed the present petition seeking compensation for the loss of lives of their respective children. The children lost their lives in a tragic incident that occurred on 15.08.2007; they were run over by a train near Street No.1012, Ajit Nagar, Shahdara, New Delhi while trying to catch the cut off kites. The parents of the deceased children claim a compensation of a sum of `11,00,000/- for the dea...
Uber India Technology Private Limited and Ors Vs. Government of Nct of ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-08-2015
#1 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6004/2015 & CM APPL. 10895/2015 UBER INDIA TECHNOLOGY PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS ..... Petitioners Through Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ajay Bhargava, Mr. Mohit Abraham and Mr. Arvind Kumar Ray, Advocates versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondents Through Mr. Naushad Ahmed Khan, Addl. Standing Counsel (Civil) for GNCTD with Mr. Jaspal Singh, MLO, Transport Dept and SI Udai Singh, Traffic/HQ. Mr. A.N. Haksar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Udyan Jain, Mr. Sonal Jain, Ms. Sarvodaya Lakshmi and Ms. Heena Sharma, Advocates for Intervener/Association of Radio Taxis. Date of Decision :8. h July, 2015 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. Present writ petition has been filed challenging the order dated 3rd June, 2015 passed by the respondent No.1 rejecting petitioner No.1s application for licence under Modified Radio Taxi Scheme, 2006 as well as seeking an order restraining respondents f...
Omway Build Estate Private Limited and Anr Vs. Ravi Sharma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-08-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Order delivered on: July 08, 2015 CRL.M.C. 705/2015 & Crl. M.A. No.2702/2015 OMWAY BUILD ESTATE PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR ..... Petitioners Through Mr. Meet Malhotra, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Ashish Aggarwal, Adv. versus RAVI SHARMA Through + ..... Respondent Mr.Jagdeep Sharma, Adv. with Mr.Misbah Bin Tariq, Adv. CRL.M.C. 5731/2014, Crl. M.A. Nos.19563/2014 & 1699/2015 NEELAM GOYAL Through ..... Petitioner Mr. Meet Malhotra, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Ashish Aggarwal, Adv. versus RAVI SHARMA Through + ..... Respondent Mr.Jagdeep Sharma, Adv. with Mr.Misbah Bin Tariq, Adv. CRL.M.C. 5746/2014 & Crl. M.A. No.19584/2014 NEELAM GOYAL Through ..... Petitioner Mr. Meet Malhotra, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Ashish Aggarwal, Adv. versus SATYENDRA JAIN Through Crl. M.C. Nos.705/2015, 5731/2014 & 5746/2014 ..... Respondent Mr.Jagdeep Sharma, Adv. with CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. Two petitioners, namely, Omway Build Estate Pvt. Ltd. and Janak Goel hav...
Essar Projects (India) Limited Vs. Indian Oil Corporation Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-08-2015
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Arb. Appeal Nos.32/2015 & 33/2015 8th July, 2015 % 1. Arb. A. No.32/2015 ESSAR PROJECTS (INDIA) LIMITED ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Chetan Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vikrant Pachnanda, Advocate. Versus INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Abhinav Vashisht, Senior Advocate with Mr. Amit Meharia, Advocate and Ms. Tanishtha Singh, Advocate.2. Arb. A. No.33/2015 ESSAR PROJECTS (INDIA) LIMITED ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Chetan Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vikrant Pachnanda, Advocate. Versus INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Abhinav Vashisht, Senior Advocate with Mr. Amit Meharia, Advocate and Ms. Tanishtha Singh, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) Caveat Nos.670-71/2015 in Arb. A. No.32/2015 1. Counsel appears for the caveator and thus the caveat stands discharged. + Arb. A. No.32/2015, I.A. No.13395/20...
M/S Jolly Videotronics Vs. Satish Thapar and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-08-2015
$~10 & 2. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % Date of Decision:08. 07.2015 RSA1572015 and C.M. No.7634/2015 M/S JOLLY VIDEOTRONICS Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Pankaj Chaudhary, Advocate. versus SATISH THAPAR & ANR ..... Respondents Through: + RSA1772015 and C.M. Nos.8510-8512/2015 M/S JOLLY VIDEOTRONICS Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Pankaj Chaudhary, Advocate. versus ANITA THAPAR & ANR ..... Respondents Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI VIPIN SANGHI, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. The present second appeals preferred under Section 100 CPC are directed against the judgment dated 05.12.2014 passed by Sh.Raghubir Singh, ADJ-15 (Central), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in RCA No.14/14/12 and RCA No.15/14/12, whereby the said first appeals preferred by the appellant/ defendant No.1 in the suit had been dismissed.2. The plaintiffs, who are impleaded as respondent in the respective appeals are husband and wife. Both the plaintiffs preferred their respective suits for recoveries. Appella...
State Vs. Robin @ Babloo
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-08-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Order delivered on: July 08, 2015 + Crl. M.C. No.2466/2015 STATE Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Sanjay Jain, ASG along with Mr.Vinod Diwakar, APP versus ROBIN @ BABLOO Through ..... Respondent None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The present petition has been filed by the State under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for setting aside the order dated 25th May, 2015 passed by Additional District and Sessions Judge-3, Rohini Court, New Delhi in FIR No.672/2008, under Section 302 IPC, Police Station Prashant Vihar, titled as State versus Robin @ Babloo and to set aside the notice under Section 350 Cr.P.C. and for expunging adverse remarks against the police.2. Brief relevant facts of the case are that the convict Robin @ Babloo, whose conviction for the offence under Section 302 IPC in FIR No.672/2008, PS Prashant Vihar was upheld by this Court was released on parole on 9th January, 2015 under the orders of this Court.3. Upon recei...
Neelam Goyal Vs. Satyendra Jain
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-08-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Order delivered on: July 08, 2015 CRL.M.C. 705/2015 & Crl. M.A. No.2702/2015 OMWAY BUILD ESTATE PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR ..... Petitioners Through Mr. Meet Malhotra, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Ashish Aggarwal, Adv. versus RAVI SHARMA Through + ..... Respondent Mr.Jagdeep Sharma, Adv. with Mr.Misbah Bin Tariq, Adv. CRL.M.C. 5731/2014, Crl. M.A. Nos.19563/2014 & 1699/2015 NEELAM GOYAL Through ..... Petitioner Mr. Meet Malhotra, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Ashish Aggarwal, Adv. versus RAVI SHARMA Through + ..... Respondent Mr.Jagdeep Sharma, Adv. with Mr.Misbah Bin Tariq, Adv. CRL.M.C. 5746/2014 & Crl. M.A. No.19584/2014 NEELAM GOYAL Through ..... Petitioner Mr. Meet Malhotra, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Ashish Aggarwal, Adv. versus SATYENDRA JAIN Through Crl. M.C. Nos.705/2015, 5731/2014 & 5746/2014 ..... Respondent Mr.Jagdeep Sharma, Adv. with CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. Two petitioners, namely, Omway Build Estate Pvt. Ltd. and Janak Goel hav...
Ram Bahadur Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-08-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON : JULY02 2015 DECIDED ON : JULY08 2015 + CRL.A.1284/2011 RAM BAHADUR ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Ravi Chaturvedi, Advocate. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through : Ms.Fizani Husain, APP. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Being aggrieved by a judgment dated 12.10.2010 in Sessions Case No.43/08 arising out of FIR No.252/07 registered at Police Station Hari Nagari by which the appellant-Ram Bahadur was convicted under Section 376 (2) (f)/366/325 IPC, the instant appeal has been preferred. By an order dated 19.10.2010, the appellant was awarded various prison terms with fine. The sentences were to operate concurrently.2. The victim is a helpless child aged around five years who was brutally ravished by the appellant. The police machinery came into motion when intimation was conveyed vide daily diary (DD) No.3A (Ex.PW-1/C) on on 01.05.2007 at 12:32 night to the effect that a child aged two years was sexually assaulted an...
Airport Autority of India Vs. Ankit Kumar Aggarwal and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-08-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: July 08, 2015 + LPA3542015 AIRPORT AUTORITY OF INDIA Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Vivek Chib and Mr.Asif Ahmed, Advocates. versus ANKIT KUMAR AGGARWAL AND OTHERS ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Prakash Gautam and Mr.Vivek Ojha, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1. Aggrieved by the order dated April 09, 2015 allowing the writ petition filed by the Respondents seeking appointment to the post of Manager (Electronics) being wait listed candidates, the Airport Authority of India prefers the present appeal.2. A writ petition was filed by Ankit Kumar Aggarwal, Abhijit Sharma, Mohit Kant Sharma and Pawan Kumar Bharti who had appeared for selection pursuant to the Advertisement No.2/2007 requiring 171 posts of Manager (Electronics) out of which 88 posts were for General Category, 46 posts were for OBC category, 25 posts for SC category and 12 posts...
- ‹ Prev
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- Next ›
- Last »