Delhi Court July 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Harminder Singh Suri Vs. Amrik Singh Suri
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-01-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:26. 05.2015 Date of Decision:01. 07.2015 + OMP No.217 of 2013 HARMINDER SINGH SURI ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Gurpreet Singh Sethi, Advocate. versus AMRIK SINGH SURI Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. A.K. Chhabra, Advocate. OMP No.219 of 2013 AMRIK SINGH SURI Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. A.K. Chhabra, Advocate. versus HARMINDER SINGH SURI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Gurpreet Singh Sethi, Advocate. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR Introduction 1. The subject matter of challenge in these petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act), is an Award dated 25th November, 2012, passed by the sole Arbitrator in the disputes between the parties. _______________________________________________________________________ 2. The challenge in OMP No.217/2013 is by Mr. Harminder Singh Suri (hereafter 'HS'), who is aggrieved by the Award to the extent it has allowed the claim petition of his brother Mr. Amrik Singh Suri ...
Yash Chhabra Vs. Maya Jain
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-01-2015
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision : July 01, 2015 + RFA(OS) 60/2015 YASH CHHABRA Represented by: ..... Appellant Ms.Vibha Dutta Makhija, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Kush Chaturvedi, Ms.Anshula Grover and Ms.Disha Vaish, Advocates versus MAYA JAIN Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Vijay K.Gupta, Advocate with Mr.Mehul Gupta, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) Caveat No.624/2015 Counsel as above appears for the respondent/caveator and thus the caveat is discharged. CM No.11220/2015 Allowed subject to just exceptions. RFA (OS) No.60/2015 1. Though the appeal is listed for preliminary hearing today, since counsel appears for the respondent on advance copy of the appeal being supplied because of the caveat filed, we have heard learned counsel for the parties at length and while doing so have considered the original record of CS (OS) No.2254/2013 which has been sent to Court along...
Commander and Ors. Vs. Bhupendra Kardam and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-01-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order reserved on May 22, 2015 Order delivered on July 01, 2015 + WP (C) No.3381/2002 COMMANDER AND ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Ms.Anjana Gosain, Adv. with Mr.Arnab Naskar, Advocate versus BHUPENDRA KARDAM & ORS Through: ..... Respondents Mr.Sachin Chauhan, Adv. for R-4 to R-6. Mr.Vinay Kr. Garg, Sr. Adv. instructed by Ms.Priyanka M. Bhardwaj, Ms.Noopur Dubey, Mr.Neeraj Sharma, Advs. for applicants in CM No.6338/2015 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.CM No.6338/2015 in Review Petition No.554/2013 1. The present application has been filed by Mahesh Kumar, respondent No.7, Ajay Pal respondent No.8, Suresh Kumar respondent No.9, Radhey Shyam respondent No.10 and Mr. Ranjan Kumar, respondent No.12 in the Writ Petition making a prayer for recall of order dated October 31, 2013 in Review Petition No.554/2013, order dated November 12, 2013 in WP (C) No.3381/2002 with a further prayer ...
Amrik Singh Suri Vs. Harminder Singh Suri
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-01-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:26. 05.2015 Date of Decision:01. 07.2015 + OMP No.217 of 2013 HARMINDER SINGH SURI ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Gurpreet Singh Sethi, Advocate. versus AMRIK SINGH SURI Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. A.K. Chhabra, Advocate. OMP No.219 of 2013 AMRIK SINGH SURI Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. A.K. Chhabra, Advocate. versus HARMINDER SINGH SURI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Gurpreet Singh Sethi, Advocate. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR Introduction 1. The subject matter of challenge in these petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act), is an Award dated 25th November, 2012, passed by the sole Arbitrator in the disputes between the parties. _______________________________________________________________________ 2. The challenge in OMP No.217/2013 is by Mr. Harminder Singh Suri (hereafter 'HS'), who is aggrieved by the Award to the extent it has allowed the claim petition of his brother Mr. Amrik Singh Suri ...
Vishesh and Anr Vs. The State (Govt of Nct of Delhi) and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-01-2015
$~21 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:1. t July, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 2581/2015 VISHESH & ANR ..... Petitioners Represented by: Mr. Samson Honey, Adv. versus THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr. M.N. Dudeja, APP for State with SI Amarjeet Singh, PSGeeta Colony. Mr. Saurabh Kaushik and Mr. Arun Gaur, Advs. for R2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) Crl. M.A. 9216/2015 Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Accordingly, the application is allowed. + CRL.M.C. 2581/2015 1. Vide the present petition, petitioners seek directions thereby quashing FIR No.307/2015, registered at PS-Geeta Colony, punishable under Section 307 IPC.2. The case of the prosecution is that on 21.05.2015 at about 6 PM two ladies came to the house of Narender Pal, respondent no.2, who were not known to him. They represented themselves as the owner of Shop No.8 situated at property No.17/93A, Geeta Colony and rang the ...
Power Grid Corpn. of (I) Ltd. Vs. Rpg Transmission Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-01-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on February 12, 2015 Judgment delivered on July 01, 2015 + ARB.P. Nos.539/1999, 540/1999, 541/1999, 542/1999 & 544/1999 POWER GRID CORPN. OF (I) LTD. Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Parag P. Tripathi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. P.K. Mishra & Ms. Kanika Tandon, Advs. versus RPG TRANSMISSION LTD. Through: ..... Respondent Mr. J.M. Mukhi, Mr. M.K. Garg & Ms. Shakumbri Singh, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.1. These five petitions have been filed by Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd. under Section 11 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act in short). These petitions were disposed of by this Court vide order dated August 20, 2001, which order was challenged by the respondent herein initially before the Division Bench of this Court by way of a Writ Petition No.7226/2000, whereby the Division Bench had dismissed the writ petition vide order dated May 09, 2002.2. The order dated May 09, 2002 was c...
Anup Kumar Gupta Vs. The State (Nct of Delhi) and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-01-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:14. h May, 2015 Judgment Pronounced on:01. t July, 2015 CRL.REV.P. 511/2008 ANUP KUMAR GUPTA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. F.K. Jha, Advocate. versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. Through: ..... Respondents None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.1. Aggrieved by the judgment of conviction dated 09.02.2004 and order on sentence dated 11.02.2004 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, awarding the sentence to the petitioner to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of two years and fine of Rs.5,000/- for offence under Section 39/44 of the Indian Electricity Act (in short the I.E. Act), in default of payment of fine to further undergo simple imprisonment for five months and upholding the judgment of conviction and sentence by the learned Additional Sessions Judge vide judgment dated 05.09.2008, the present revision petition has been filed by the petitioner. However, the sentence was modified to one yea...
Dharambir Vs. The State ( G.N.C.T) of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-01-2015
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.REV.P. 293/2015 & CRL.M.B.7027/2015 Date of decision:01. 07.2015 DHARAMBIR ..... Petitioner Through Mr. L.D. Mual, Mr.S.S. Mual & Mr.Pranav Siroha, Advs. versus THE STATE ( G.N.C.T) OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through Mr. Neeraj Kumar, APP. SI Des Raj PS Vikas Puri. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J.(ORAL) The revisionist assails the judgment and orders of Trial Court dated 15.02.2013\ 6.5.13 passed in connection with FIR No.456/2002 (P.S.Vikas Puri) whereby he was convicted for offences under sec. 279/304A IPC and was sentenced to undergo RI for 9 months, fine of Rs. 9000/- and in default of payment of fine SI for 6 months for the offence u/s 304A IPC and SI for 3 months and fine of Rs.1000/-, with a default stipulation for one month for the offence under sec. 279 IPC, the sentences having been ordered to run concurrently. The revisionist further assails the judgment and order passed in Criminal Appeal No.301...
Tapash Kar Vs. State of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-01-2015
I- 20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:01. h July, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 2580/2015 TAPASH KAR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Shailesh Tiwari, Advocate versus STATE OF DELHI & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Parveen Bhati, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with ASI Ram Dev Mr. Chander Prakash Pandey, Advocate with respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.102/2015, under Section 420 of the IPC, registered at police station Greater Kailash, New Delhi is sought on the basis of Memorandum of Understanding of 29th June, 2015 and on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR in question now stands cleared between the parties. Notice. Mr. Parveen Bhati, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and Mr. Chander Prakash Pandey, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.2. Crl.M.C.No.2580/2015 Page 1 Learned Additional Public Prosecutor fo...
Beena Aggarwal and Ors. Vs. Deepak Aswani and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-01-2015
* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + C.M. (M) No.364/2015 & C.M. No.7768/2015 Decided on :1. t July, 2015 BEENA AGGARWAL & ORS. Petitioners Through: Ms. Neha Kapoor, Advocate. Versus DEEPAK ASWANI & ORS. Through: Respondents Mr. Pradeep Gaur, Advocate for R-4. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition filed by the petitioners by virtue of which a prayer for setting aside the order dated 21.10.2014 and 24.3.2015 has been prayed for. It has been further prayed that the petitioners be permitted to contest the application of respondent No.4/insurance company for reopening of the evidence or in the alternative, the petitioners be permitted to cross-examine the witness, R4W1 i.e. Atul Kapur, Chartered Accountant whose investigation report regarding income of the deceased was taken on record vide order dated 21.10.2014.2. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have also gone through the trial court record.3. This is a claim petition under ...
- ‹ Prev
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- Next ›