Delhi Court July 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shree Nath Heritage Liquor Pvt. Ltd. Vs. M/S. Allied Blender and Disti ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-06-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on : May 26, 2015 Judgment Delivered on : July 06, 2015 + FAO (OS) 368/2014 SHREE NATH HERITAGE LIQUOR PVT. LTD. .Appellant Represented by: Mr.Jayant Tripathi, Advocate with Mr.Sumit Rajput, Advocate versus M/S. ALLIED BLENDER & DISTILLERS PVT. LTD. .....Respondent Represented by: Mr.Pravin Anand, Advocate with Mr.Shrawan Chopra, Advocate, Ms.Abhilasha Nautiyal, Advocate and Mr.Vibhav Mithal, Advocate FAO (OS) 493/2014 SENTINI BIO PRODUCTS PVT. LTD. .Appellant Represented by: Mr.Gopal Subramaniam, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Gagan Gupta, Advocate versus M/S. ALLIED BLENDER & DISTILLERS PVT. LTD. .....Respondent Represented by: Mr.Pravin Anand, Advocate with Mr.Shrawan Chopra, Advocate, Ms.Abhilasha Nautiyal, Advocate and Mr.Vibhav Mithal, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Shree Nath Heritage Liquor Pvt. Ltd. (the appellant of FAO (OS) No.368/2014)...
Rajiv Sharma and Ors Vs. The State ( Govt of Nct of Delhi) and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-06-2015
$~54 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:6. h July, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 2645/2015 RAJIV SHARMA & ORS Represented by: ..... Petitioners Mr. Saurabh Jhamb and Mr. Mukesh Gupta, with Petitioner No.1 in person. Versus THE STATE ( GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR... Respondents Represented by: Ms. Jasbir Kaur, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State with SI Shailendra K. Singh, P.S. Khajuri Khas. Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. By way of this petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.429/2011 registered at Police Station Khajuri Khas for the offences punishable under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC on 23.12.2011 and the consequential proceedings emanating therefrom against the petitioners on the ground that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties.2. Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that the aforesaid case ...
Jai Prakash Singh Vs. State of Delhi (Nct)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-06-2015
$~50 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:6. h July, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 2633/2015 JAI PRAKASH SINGH Represented by: ..... Petitioner Petitioner in person Versus STATE OF DELHI (NCT) ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. M.N. Dudeja, APP for the State. SI Sanjeev Kumar, PS Connaught Place. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) CRL M.A. No.9418 of 2015 (Exemption) Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. The application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 2633/2015 1. Vide the present petition, petitioner seeks direction thereby setting aside the impugned order dated 16.03.2015 passed by learned ASJ-02/FTC New Delhi District, Patiala House Courts and remaining accused may be directed to be summoned by the Trial Court.2. The facts of the case are that vide FIR No.701/99, a case was registered on 26.09.1999 at PS Connaught Place for the offences punishable under sections 420/468/471/120B IPC against the accused persons, namely, Ranjodh Singh, Dalj...
Shan Mohd and Ors. Vs. State (Nct of Delhi) and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-06-2015
$~42 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:6. h July, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 2622/2015 SHAN MOHD & ORS. ..... Petitioners Represented by: Mr. Trilok Chand, Adv. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr. M.N. Dudeja, APP for State with SI Manish Sharma, PS-Aman Vihar. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. Vide the instant petition, petitioner seeks directions thereby quashing FIR No.242/2013, registered at PS-Aman Vihar for the offences punishable under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC.2. Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that the aforesaid case was registered on the complaint of respondent No.2 Smt. Sameena, who settled all her disputes with the petitioners vide settlement dated 14.01.2015 before the Principal Judge, Family Courts, North-West, Rohini, Delhi.3. Ld. Counsel submits that the marriage between petitioner No.1 and respondent No.2 has already been dissolved vide Decree of Divorce dated ...
Samarth Mittal Vs. Union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-06-2015
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:6. h July, 2015 % + W.P.(C) 6170/2015 & CM No.11211/2015 (for directions). SAMARTH MITTAL Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Ayushya Kumar with Mr. J.K. Goyal & Mr. Gaurav Goyal, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through: ..... Respondents Mrs. Bharathi Raju, CGSC for R-1. Mr. Amit Bansal, Adv. for R-2&3. CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J1 On 30th June, 2015 when this petition came up first, the following order was passed:1. The petition impugns the refusal of the respondent No.2/CBSE to reevaluate the answer sheet of the petitioner in the subject of Physical Education in the Class XII examination.2. The counsel for the petitioner on enquiry states that the examination in Physical Education comprises of a theory paper of 70 marks and a practical of 30 marks and clarifies that he is seeking review of the marks accorded to the petitioner in the theory paper only.3. The attention of this court is drawn to...
Gaurav Katara Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-06-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON : MAY20 2015 DECIDED ON : JULY06 2015 + CRL.A.433/2006 GAURAV KATARA Through : ..... Appellant Mr.Rajiv Bajaj, Advocate. versus STATE Through : + ..... Respondent Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP. CRL.REV.P. 519/2006 AMBRISH MAHESHWARI Through : ..... Petitioner None. versus MEENA KATARA & ANR Through : + ..... Respondents Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP for R-2. SI Rajendra Singh, PS Krishna Nagar. CRL.REV.P. 490/2006 AMBRISH MAHESHWARI Through : ..... Petitioner None. versus GAURAV KATARA & ANR Through : ..... Respondents Mr.Rajiv Bajaj, Advocate, for R-1. Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP for R-2. SI Rajendra Singh, PS Krishna Nagar. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. The appellant Gaurav Katara challenges the legality and correctness of a judgment dated 18.05.2006 in Sessions Case No.152/04 arising out of FIR No.302/2004 registered at Police Station Krishna Nagar by which he was held guilty for committing offences under Section 366/376 IPC. By an or...
v G Jagdishan Vs. M/S Indofos Industries Limited and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-06-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision : July 06, 2015 + LPA4122015 V G JAGDISHAN Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Vinay Sabharwal and Ms.Neha Sabharwal, Advocates. versus M/S INDOFOS INDUSTRIES LIMITED & ANR ..... Respondents Represented by: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) LPA4122015 1. Services of V.G.Jagdishan employed as a driver on December 02, 1983 were terminated w.e.f May 23, 1996. Since the head office of the Management was at Delhi, V.G.Jagdishan sent a demand notice and thereafter filed a claim before the Conciliation Officer at Delhi. In the conciliation proceedings, though retrenchment compensation of `22,175/plus one month notice pay of `3,203/- was offered however, he refused to accept the same and the said amount was sent through cheque by registered post.2. It is the case of V.G.Jagdishan that since the Management had sold off its vehicle and offered alternative jobs to him...
Suresh B. Kapur Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-06-2015
$~34 THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:06. 07.2015 W.P.(C) 2163/2015 & CM38992015 SURESH B. KAPUR ... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case:- For the Petitioner For the Respondent No.1 For the Respondent L&B/LAC For the Respondent DDA : Mr Bharat Beriwal : Mr Anuj Aggarwal : Mr Yeeshu Jain with Ms Jyoti Tyagi : Mr Sanjeev Sabharwal CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The counter affidavit handed over by Mr Yeeshu Jain, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos. 2 & 3, is taken on record. The learned counsel for the petitioner does not wish to file any rejoinder affidavit inasmuch as all the necessary averments are contained in the writ petition.2. By way of this writ petition, the petitioner seeks the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitatio...
Muzzaffar Ali Alias Sukka Vs. The State Govt of National Capital Terri ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-06-2015
$~57 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:6. h July, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 2651/2015 MUZZAFFAR ALI ALIAS SUKKA ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr. G.H. Mirza, Adv. versus THE STATE GOVT OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr. Satish Kr. Verma, APP for State with SI Vihas Sahu, PSUttam Nagar. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) CM. No.9456/2015 (for exemption) Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Accordingly, the application is allowed. + CRL.M.C. 2651/2015 1. Vide the present petition, petitioner seeks directions thereby quashing the FIR No.232/2010, registered at PS-Uttam Nagar for the offences punishable under Sections 363 IPC.2. Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that aforesaid case was registered against the petitioner on the complaint of respondent no.2, i.e., the father of Naseen Banu.3. The allegations against the petitioner are that on 14.07.2010, petit...
Riaz Munir Ahmad Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-06-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: July 6, 2015 + WP (C) No.6315/2010 RIAZ MUNIR AHMAD Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Mobin Akhtar, Adv. with Petitioner in person versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Bhagvan Swarup Shukla, Adv. with Mr. Vinod Kumar Tiwari, Adv for R-1/UOI Mr. Amit George, Adv. with Ms. Zeba Khair, Adv. for R-2 to 4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.CM No.5383/2015 (for necessary directions and early hearing) This is an application seeking necessary directions and early hearing of the writ petition. For the reasons stated in the application, and as the counsel for the parties agree that the writ petition involves a very short issue and the same be heard, accordingly, I allow the early hearing of the petition and the learned counsel for the parties have been heard on merit. WP (C) No.6315/2010 1. The challenge in this writ petition is to the orders dated March 24, 2005 and November 17, 2005 where...
- ‹ Prev
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- Next ›
- Last »