Delhi Court September 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Vishnu S Kumar Vs. All India Institute of Medical Science (Aiims) and ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-09-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:09. 09.2013 W.P.(C) 5354/2013 VISHNU S KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Sanjeev Narula, Adv. with petitioner in person. versus ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCE (AIIMS) & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr Ajay Kalra, Adv for R-1 Mr Neeraj Chaudhari, CGSC for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) The petitioner, who belongs to OBC category, appeared in the entrance examination held on 01.06.2013 for admission to the MBBS course in All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) and obtained rank 2168. The following was the schedule of counseling notified by AIIMS:1. t Round of Counselling 10th July, 2013 for UR seats (for all candidates up to rank 1348 irrespective of the Category. 11th July, 2013 for OBC seats. 12th July, 2013 for SC/ST seats 2nd Round of Counseling-17th August3. d AND FINAL ROUND OF COUNSELLING -12TH September2. The instructions contained in the counseling call letter,...
Anjani Technoplast Ltd Vs. Uoi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-09-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on :05. 09.2013 Judgment pronounced on :09. 09.2013 W.P.(C) 3917/2011 ANJANI TECHNOPLAST LTD Through: versus ..... Petitioner Mr. Shiv Khorana, Adv. UOI Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Saqib, Adv. for UOI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN V.K. JAIN, J.The challenge in this writ petition is to the order dated 24.01.2011 passed by the respondent, forbidding all Departments/Ministries/Offices of the Government of India from having commercial/ business dealings with the petitioner, for a period of 3 years, from the date of the order.2. The respondent-Union of India, invited tender on 3.7.2009, for purchase of 59,000 light-weight bulletproof jackets. A Technical Evaluation Committee (TEC) was constituted by the Government of India to carry out physical evaluation of the samples received from various tenderers including the petitioner. The sample submitted by the petitioner was, however, W.P(C) No.3917/2011 rejected by the said...
Gulshan Kumar Arora Vs. Ashwani Shukla and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-09-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % I.A. No. 5909/2013 in CS(OS) 508/2005 + Date of Decision:9. h September, 2013 # GULSHAN KUMAR ARORA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Sushil Kumar, Advocate Versus $ * ASHWANI SHUKLA AND ORS. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. S.K. Mishra, Advocate for D-1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K.BHASIN ORDER P.K.BHASIN, J: In this suit for specific performance of two separate agreements of sale entered into between the plaintiff and defendant nos.1 and 2 sometime in the year 2004 in respect of their half undivided share and interest in the terrace floor of property no. B-4/195, Safdarjung Enclave, New Delhi (hereinafter to be referred to as the terrace in dispute) this Court had vide order dated 20th April, 2005 directed maintenance of status quo in respect of the ownership, possession etc. of the terrace in dispute. The defendant no.1 had allegedly sold his undivided share to one Sikander Pal in violation of the said direction of the Court. Upon an application...
National Insurance Co. Ltd. Q Vs. Pramod Kumar Sharma and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-09-2013
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:9th September, 2013 % + MAC.APP. 673/2006 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Shantha Devi Raman, Advocate. Versus PRAMOD KUMAR SHARMA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Saurabh Kansal, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 3 and 4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. The present appeal is directed against the impugned order dated 17.04.2006 passed by the learned Tribunal.2. It is pointed out that service upon respondent No. 1 was dispensed with vide order dated 17.07.2007 and respondent Nos. 2 to 4 were proceeded ex parte.3. Vide order dated 14.05.2013, this Court issued the court notices against the respondents through their counsels.4. Pursuant thereto respondent Nos. 3 and 4 appeared on 23.07.2013 and on their request, the Secretary, Delhi High Court Legal Services Committee was directed to provide them a counsel. Accordingly, Mr. Saurabh Kansal, learned counsel appointed ...
Shri Ram and anr. Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-09-2013
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: September 09, 2013 + CRL.A.No.252/2004 SHRI RAM & ANR. Represented by: ..... Appellants Mr.Saahila Lamba, Advocate/ Amicus Curiae versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Pawan Sharma, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. The appeal has reached for hearing today. Regretfully, none appears for the appellant.2. Ms.Saahila Lamba, Advocate on the panel of Delhi High Court Legal Services Committee has been requested to assist the Court on behalf of the appellant.3. Fee of learned Amicus Curiae Ms.Saahila Lamba, Advocate shall be paid by the Delhi High Court Legal Services Committee.4. The impugned judgment and the evidence would reveal that the appellant was the son of the proprietor of M/s.Shri Ram Sweets.5. Dated September 14, 1994 is Ex.PX: Delhi (Milk and Milk Products) Control Order prohibiting conversion of milk into milk products.6. Record of the learned Trial Court...
Gurpartap Singh and anr Vs. M/S Vista Hospitality Pvt Ltd and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-09-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:23. d August, 2013 Date of decision:9. h September, 2013 % + CO.A(SB) 22/2013 WITH CO. APPL. 833/2013 GURPARTAP SINGH & ANR .....Appellants Through: Mr.Virender Ganda, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rakesh Kumar and Mr.Aditya Nayyan, Advocates. versus M/S VISTA HOSPITALITY PVT LTD & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Ravi Gupta, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Ashish Aggarwal and Mr.Varun Sharma, Advocates for R-2 to 5. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR JUDGMENT R.V. EASWAR, J.:1. This is an appeal filed by one Shri Gurpartap Singh and Smt. Geeta Partap Singh under section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956 (Act, for short) impugning the order passed by the Company Law Board in C.P. No.7(ND)/2013 and CA No.41/2013 on 13.03.2013.2. It is necessary to give a brief background of the facts leading to the filing of the present appeal. The respondent-company, Vista Hospitality Private Ltd. was incorporated on 10.01.2003, with the appellants as the original promoters ...
Baby Neeta @ Sunita Vs. Miland Kumar and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-09-2013
$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:9. h September, 2013 % + MAC.APP. 329/2011 BABY NEETA @ SUNITA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Navneet Goyal and Ms. Mamta Bhardwaj, Advs. versus MILAND KUMAR & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Adv. for R2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. Instant appeal has been preferred against the impugned award dated 28.02.2011, whereby, ld. Tribunal has granted a sum of Rs.1,65,606/- as compensation with interest @ 7.5% per annum from the date of institution of the claim petition, i.e., 13.12.2007 till realization.2. Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant has argued that ld. Tribunal has not considered the entire facts and the award granted by the ld. Tribunal is not proper.3. The injured is a minor girl of 11years and the similar issue came before the Supreme Court in a recent decision in a case of Master Mallikarjun v. Divisional Manager, the National Insurance Co. Ltd. in C...
Jagan Vs. State and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-09-2013
$~15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 4114/2011 & Crl. MA 19168/2011 Date of Decision :9. h September, 2013 % JAGAN Through ..... Petitioner Mr. S.N. Gupta, Adv. versus STATE & ANR Through ..... Respondents Mr. Neeraj Kr. Singh, APP. Mr. Piyush Sharma, Adv. for respondent no.2. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The petitioner is challenging the territorial jurisdiction of the learned Metropolitan Magistrate to entertain and try the complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act on the ground that the deposit of cheque by respondent no.2 in its Bank at Delhi would not confer jurisdiction on the learned Metropolitan Magistrate.2. The law with respect to the territorial jurisdiction of the Court under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act has been set at rest by the Supreme Court in Nishant Aggarwal v. Kailash Kumar Sharma, 2013 (7) SCALE 75 in which the Supreme Court, after considering Shri Ishar Alloy Steels Ltd. (supra) a...
Yagya Dutt Sharma Vs. the State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-09-2013
$* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :9. h SEPTEMBER, 2013 + CRL.A.1185/2012 YAGYA DUTT SHARMA Through : ..... Appellant Mr.Mr.P.K.Bhardwaj, Advocate with Mr.N.K.Sharma, Advocate. versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through : ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.Garg, J.(Open Court) 1. Yagya Dutt Sharma (the appellant) challenges a judgment dated 16.08.2012 in Sessions Case No. 49/2009 arising out of FIR No. 255/07 PS Dwarka by which he was held guilty for committing offence punishable under Sections 255/256/259/260/420/120B IPC. By an order dated 23.08.2012, he was awarded RI for seven years with fine ` 25,000/under Section 256 IPC and imprisonment for the period already undergone under Section 255/259/260/420/120B with fine ` 25,000/-.2. Allegations against the appellant were that on 10.03.2007 he with his associates hatched a criminal conspiracy to print counterfeit postal stamps and pursuant to that criminal conspiracy, the a...
Sanjay Singh Vs. M/S Corporate Warranties Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-09-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:9. h September, 2013 % + RFA No.395/2013 SANJAY SINGH Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Rakesh Kumar Singh, Adv. Versus M/S CORPORATE WARRANTIES PVT. LTD. ..... Respodent Through: None. CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J 1.This appeal impugns the judgment and decree (dated 15 th May, 2013 of the Court of Addl. District Judge-02 (South) in CS No.12/2010 (Unique Case ID No.02406C0365612010)) of ejectment of the appellant from property not D-129, Saket, New Delhi and for recovery of mesne profits of Rs.3,96,000/-.2. The appeal came up before this Court first on 26 th August, 2013 when the counsel for the appellant being unable to answer the queries raised by this Court had sought adjournment. While so adjourning the appeal, the Trial Court record was also requisitioned and has been received.3. The counsel for the appellant has been heard.4. The respondent / plaintiff instituted the suit from which this ap...