Delhi Court September 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Commissioner of Income Tax-xiii Vs. Bansal Commodities and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-10-2013
$~6 & 7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:02. 07.2013 Decided on:10. 09.2013 + RFA(OS) 17/2010, APPL.3611/2010 C.M. APPL.3608/2010 & C.M. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-XIII ..... Appellant versus BANSAL COMMODITIES & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Sh. Sanjeev Rajpal, Advocate, [for Resp. No.2 in Item No. 6 and for appellant in Item No.7). Sh. V.N. Jha and Sh. Shashwat Bajpai, Advocates (Item Nos.6 and7) Sh. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Mahendra Rana, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % RFA (OS) 92/09 & RFA (OS) 17/10 Page 1 For detailed judgment, the decision dated 10.09.2013 in RFA (OS) 92/2009 may be referred to. (S. RAVINDRA BHAT) JUDGE (NAJMI WAZIRI) JUDGE SEPTEMBER 10 2013 RFA (OS) 92/09 & RFA (OS) 17/10 Page 2...
Dhyan Singh Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-10-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :13. h August, 2013 DECIDED ON :10. h September, 2013 + CRL.A.44/2010 DHYAN SINGH ..... Appellant Through : Mr.M.Shamikh, Advocate. versus STATE ..... Respondents Through : Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP for the State. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.The present appeal is disposed of in terms of a detailed common judgment delivered today which is placed in the file of Crl.A.No.574/2011 titled Sanjay Kumar Vashisth Vs.State. (S.P.GARG) JUDGE September 10, 2013 sa...
Rakesh Vs. State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-10-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:26. h August, 2013 Date of Decision:10. h September, 2013 % + CRIMINAL APPEAL No.524/2010 RAKESH ..... Appellant Through: Ms.Rakhi Dubey, Adv. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI Through: ..... Respondent Mr.Sanjay Lao, APP for State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K. BHASIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VED PRAKASH VAISH VED PRAKASH VAISH, J:1. Rakesh, the accused appellant vide judgment dated 17th August 2009 was convicted of charge under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC for short) for committing murder of Vinod, s/o Balmiki Prasad at Jhuggi No. A-11/12, Maya Puri, Phase-I, New Delhi. On trial, learned District Judge cum Additional Sessions Judge (Incharge), Dwarka Courts, New Delhi found the appellant guilty of the offence charged. Vide order on sentence dated 20th August, 2009, the appellant was sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay fine of Rs.3,000/- and in default of payment of fine, to further undergo SI for three years.2....
Rajesh Gupta Vs. Harish Gupta and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-10-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on :03.09.2013 Judgment Pronounced on:10. 09.2013 + IA No. 5116/2012 in CS(OS) 1855/2012 RAJESH GUPTA Through ..... Plaintiff Ms.Payal Jain and Mr. Rajesh Gupta, Advocate versus HARISH GUPTA & ORS ..... Defendants Through Mr. Shiv K. Tyagi, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.IA No. 5116/2012 (u/O 3.R 2A) 1. The plaintiff has filed the present suit seeking a preliminary decree of partition of suit properties, namely, property No. 2573-A/1, Gali No. 11, Near Jain Mandir, Goverdhan Bihari Colony, Shahadra, Delhi-110032 and property No. E-78, Industrial Area Bahadrabad, Haridwar, Uttranchal and for declaring that the plaintiff has 1/4th share in the properties.2. The aforesaid matter came up for hearing on 27.07.2012 when an order was passed whereby parties were directed to maintain status quo with respect to the suit properties till the next date.3. The plaintiff has filed the present application st...
Explo Media Pvt Ltd Vs. Pwd and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-10-2013
$~46,10,14,23 to 28 and 40&41 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:10. 09.2013 W.P.(C) 5118/2013 & CM 11517/2013 M/S BRITE NEON SIGNS PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Alok Gupta, Adv. versus PUBLIC WORKS DEPTT. & ANR Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Pinky Anand, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Mini Pushkarna, Standing Counsel and Ms. Namrata Sharma, Advs. for MCD W.P.(C) 869/2012 BRITE NEON SIGNS PVT LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Alok Gupta, Adv. versus PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (PWD) & ANR ..... Respondent Through: + Mr. Amar Nath Saini, Adv. Ms. Pinky Anand, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Mini Pushkarna, Standing Counsel and Ms. Namrata Sharma, Advs. for MCD W.P.(C) 2524/2013 & CM 4782/2013 M/S TRIPLE ESS COMMUNICATION PVT. LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Abul Sattar, Adv. versus PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT AND ANR Through: W.P.(C) 5118/2013&other connected matters ..... Respondent Mr. Amiet Andlay and Mr. Arun K. Sharma, + + + Ms. Pinky Anand, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Mini Pushkarna, ...
Jr Creations Advertising Pvt Ltd Vs. Pwd and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-10-2013
$~46,10,14,23 to 28 and 40&41 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:10. 09.2013 W.P.(C) 5118/2013 & CM 11517/2013 M/S BRITE NEON SIGNS PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Alok Gupta, Adv. versus PUBLIC WORKS DEPTT. & ANR Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Pinky Anand, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Mini Pushkarna, Standing Counsel and Ms. Namrata Sharma, Advs. for MCD W.P.(C) 869/2012 BRITE NEON SIGNS PVT LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Alok Gupta, Adv. versus PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (PWD) & ANR ..... Respondent Through: + Mr. Amar Nath Saini, Adv. Ms. Pinky Anand, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Mini Pushkarna, Standing Counsel and Ms. Namrata Sharma, Advs. for MCD W.P.(C) 2524/2013 & CM 4782/2013 M/S TRIPLE ESS COMMUNICATION PVT. LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Abul Sattar, Adv. versus PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT AND ANR Through: W.P.(C) 5118/2013&other connected matters ..... Respondent Mr. Amiet Andlay and Mr. Arun K. Sharma, + + + Ms. Pinky Anand, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Mini Pushkarna, ...
Joice Johnson Vs. Director, Directorate of Edu. and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-10-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % W.P.(C) No. 17195/2004 10th September, 2013 JOICE JOHNSON Through: ......Petitioner Mr. Manoj v. George and Mr. K.Girees Kumar, Advs. VERSUS DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF EDU. & ANR. ...... Respondents Through: Mr. A.P.Mukundan, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. Counsel for the petitioner says that the only relief which the petitioner presses is for payment of monetary emoluments in terms of the 5 th Pay Commission Report and also consequential increase of terminal benefits to the petitioner who retired from the respondent no.2-school on 29.2.2004.2. Counsel for respondent no.2-school rightly does not dispute that the 5th Pay Commission Report becomes applicable to all the schools in Delhi and schools have to pay its employees the payment in terms of the 5 th Pay Commission Report.3. The only defence urged on behalf of the respondent no.2-school is that sch...
Rohit Sharma Vs. Pwd and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-10-2013
$~46,10,14,23 to 28 and 40&41 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:10. 09.2013 W.P.(C) 5118/2013 & CM 11517/2013 M/S BRITE NEON SIGNS PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Alok Gupta, Adv. versus PUBLIC WORKS DEPTT. & ANR Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Pinky Anand, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Mini Pushkarna, Standing Counsel and Ms. Namrata Sharma, Advs. for MCD W.P.(C) 869/2012 BRITE NEON SIGNS PVT LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Alok Gupta, Adv. versus PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (PWD) & ANR ..... Respondent Through: + Mr. Amar Nath Saini, Adv. Ms. Pinky Anand, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Mini Pushkarna, Standing Counsel and Ms. Namrata Sharma, Advs. for MCD W.P.(C) 2524/2013 & CM 4782/2013 M/S TRIPLE ESS COMMUNICATION PVT. LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Abul Sattar, Adv. versus PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT AND ANR Through: W.P.(C) 5118/2013&other connected matters ..... Respondent Mr. Amiet Andlay and Mr. Arun K. Sharma, + + + Ms. Pinky Anand, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Mini Pushkarna, ...
Landmark Outdoor Media Services P Ltd Vs. Public Works Department and ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-10-2013
$~46,10,14,23 to 28 and 40&41 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:10. 09.2013 W.P.(C) 5118/2013 & CM 11517/2013 M/S BRITE NEON SIGNS PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Alok Gupta, Adv. versus PUBLIC WORKS DEPTT. & ANR Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Pinky Anand, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Mini Pushkarna, Standing Counsel and Ms. Namrata Sharma, Advs. for MCD W.P.(C) 869/2012 BRITE NEON SIGNS PVT LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Alok Gupta, Adv. versus PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (PWD) & ANR ..... Respondent Through: + Mr. Amar Nath Saini, Adv. Ms. Pinky Anand, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Mini Pushkarna, Standing Counsel and Ms. Namrata Sharma, Advs. for MCD W.P.(C) 2524/2013 & CM 4782/2013 M/S TRIPLE ESS COMMUNICATION PVT. LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Abul Sattar, Adv. versus PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT AND ANR Through: W.P.(C) 5118/2013&other connected matters ..... Respondent Mr. Amiet Andlay and Mr. Arun K. Sharma, + + + Ms. Pinky Anand, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Mini Pushkarna, ...
M/S Triple Ess Communication Pvt. Ltd Vs. Public Works Department and ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-10-2013
$~46,10,14,23 to 28 and 40&41 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:10. 09.2013 W.P.(C) 5118/2013 & CM 11517/2013 M/S BRITE NEON SIGNS PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Alok Gupta, Adv. versus PUBLIC WORKS DEPTT. & ANR Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Pinky Anand, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Mini Pushkarna, Standing Counsel and Ms. Namrata Sharma, Advs. for MCD W.P.(C) 869/2012 BRITE NEON SIGNS PVT LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Alok Gupta, Adv. versus PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (PWD) & ANR ..... Respondent Through: + Mr. Amar Nath Saini, Adv. Ms. Pinky Anand, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Mini Pushkarna, Standing Counsel and Ms. Namrata Sharma, Advs. for MCD W.P.(C) 2524/2013 & CM 4782/2013 M/S TRIPLE ESS COMMUNICATION PVT. LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Abul Sattar, Adv. versus PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT AND ANR Through: W.P.(C) 5118/2013&other connected matters ..... Respondent Mr. Amiet Andlay and Mr. Arun K. Sharma, + + + Ms. Pinky Anand, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Mini Pushkarna, ...
- ‹ Prev
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- Next ›
- Last »