Delhi Court September 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kerala Education Society Vs. Director of Education and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-10-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.8204/2011 & WP(C) 7170/2011 10th September, 2013 % 1. WP(C) 8204/2011 & CM 18500/2011 (Stay), CM 5803/2012 (interim directions) & CM No.6003/2012 (condonation of delay) LEELA GOVIND Through: ......Petitioner Ms. Indrani Ghosh, Adv. VERSUS KERALA EDUCATION SOCIETY SR. SECONDARY SCHOOL MANAGING COMMITTEE & ORS. ...... Respondents Through: Mr. Romy Chacko, Mr. Varun Mudgal and Ms. Amrita , Advocates for R-1 and 2. Mr. Ashok Agarwal, Adv. for R-3.2. WP(C) 7170/2011 & CM 17932/2011 KERALA EDUCATION SOCIETY ...... Petitioner Through: Mr. Romy Chacko, Mr. Varun Mudgal and Ms. Amrita , Advocates Versus DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION & Ors. ......Respondent Through: Ms. Sana Ansari, Adv. for Ms. Zubeda Begum, Adv. for R-1 and 2. Ms. Indrani Ghosh, Adv. for proposed respondent Mr. Ashok Agarwal, Adv. for R-3. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) WP(C) 8204/2011 1. By this writ pet...
Jp Gupta Decd Thru Lrs Vs. Delhi Development Authority and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-10-2013
* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + F.A.O. No.216/2012 & C.M. No.9142/2012 (for stay) Decided on :10. h September, 2013 JP GUPTA DECD THRU LRS. Appellant Through: Mr. Amar Pal, Advocate. Versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS. Respondents Through: None. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is an appeal filed by the appellants under Order 43 Rule 1 CPC against the order dated 5.1.2012 passed by the District Judge by virtue of which the application of the appellants under Order 22 Rule 3 CPC for substituting their names as legal representatives of the deceased appellant, J.P. Gupta, was rejected.2. The learned counsel for the appellants has contended that the right to sue survives and, therefore, the appellants be impleaded as legal representatives of the deceased appellant, J.P. Gupta. In support of his submission, the learned counsel has sought to place reliance on the Will dated 2.10.2010 purported to have been made by J.P. Gupta bequeathing certain i...
Sanjay Khanna (Huf) Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-10-2013
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:10. 09.2013 W.P.(C) 6624/2012 SANJAY KHANNA (HUF) ..... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS + ..... Respondents W.P.(C) 6625/2012 PRAMOD MEHRA ..... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS + ..... Respondents W.P.(C) 1018/2013 DEVINDER MEHRA ..... Petitioner versus UOI AND ORS + ..... Respondents W.P.(C) 1797/2013 SUSHIL KUMAR MALIK AND ORS ..... Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners : WP(C) Nos.6624-25/2012,1018/2013, 1797/2013 Mr N.S. Vasisht in W.P.(C) Nos. 662425/2012 Ms Shoma Chaudhuri in W.P.(C) No.1018/2013 Mr R.S. Rana in W.P.(C) No.1797/2013 Page 1 of 15 For the Respondents : Mr Roshan Lal Goel and Ms Mansi Gupta for UOI in W.P.(C) Nos. 6624-25/2012 Ms Saakshi Agrawal and Mr Himanshu Bajaj for UOI in W.P.(C) No.1018/2013 Mr Vijay Kenger for UOI in W.P.(C) No.1797/2013 Mr Sanjay Kumar Patha, Mr Rohit Rai, Ms Jhum Jhum Sarkar, Advoca...
Pramod Mehra Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-10-2013
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:10. 09.2013 W.P.(C) 6624/2012 SANJAY KHANNA (HUF) ..... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS + ..... Respondents W.P.(C) 6625/2012 PRAMOD MEHRA ..... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS + ..... Respondents W.P.(C) 1018/2013 DEVINDER MEHRA ..... Petitioner versus UOI AND ORS + ..... Respondents W.P.(C) 1797/2013 SUSHIL KUMAR MALIK AND ORS ..... Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners : WP(C) Nos.6624-25/2012,1018/2013, 1797/2013 Mr N.S. Vasisht in W.P.(C) Nos. 662425/2012 Ms Shoma Chaudhuri in W.P.(C) No.1018/2013 Mr R.S. Rana in W.P.(C) No.1797/2013 Page 1 of 15 For the Respondents : Mr Roshan Lal Goel and Ms Mansi Gupta for UOI in W.P.(C) Nos. 6624-25/2012 Ms Saakshi Agrawal and Mr Himanshu Bajaj for UOI in W.P.(C) No.1018/2013 Mr Vijay Kenger for UOI in W.P.(C) No.1797/2013 Mr Sanjay Kumar Patha, Mr Rohit Rai, Ms Jhum Jhum Sarkar, Advoca...
Kerala Education Society Vs. Director of Education and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-10-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.8204/2011 & WP(C) 7170/2011 10th September, 2013 % 1. WP(C) 8204/2011 & CM 18500/2011 (Stay), CM 5803/2012 (interim directions) & CM No.6003/2012 (condonation of delay) LEELA GOVIND Through: ......Petitioner Ms. Indrani Ghosh, Adv. VERSUS KERALA EDUCATION SOCIETY SR. SECONDARY SCHOOL MANAGING COMMITTEE & ORS. ...... Respondents Through: Mr. Romy Chacko, Mr. Varun Mudgal and Ms. Amrita , Advocates for R-1 and 2. Mr. Ashok Agarwal, Adv. for R-3.2. WP(C) 7170/2011 & CM 17932/2011 KERALA EDUCATION SOCIETY ...... Petitioner Through: Mr. Romy Chacko, Mr. Varun Mudgal and Ms. Amrita , Advocates Versus DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION & Ors. ......Respondent Through: Ms. Sana Ansari, Adv. for Ms. Zubeda Begum, Adv. for R-1 and 2. Ms. Indrani Ghosh, Adv. for proposed respondent Mr. Ashok Agarwal, Adv. for R-3. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) WP(C) 8204/2011 1. By this writ pet...
Devinder Mehra Vs. Uoi and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-10-2013
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:10. 09.2013 W.P.(C) 6624/2012 SANJAY KHANNA (HUF) ..... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS + ..... Respondents W.P.(C) 6625/2012 PRAMOD MEHRA ..... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS + ..... Respondents W.P.(C) 1018/2013 DEVINDER MEHRA ..... Petitioner versus UOI AND ORS + ..... Respondents W.P.(C) 1797/2013 SUSHIL KUMAR MALIK AND ORS ..... Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners : WP(C) Nos.6624-25/2012,1018/2013, 1797/2013 Mr N.S. Vasisht in W.P.(C) Nos. 662425/2012 Ms Shoma Chaudhuri in W.P.(C) No.1018/2013 Mr R.S. Rana in W.P.(C) No.1797/2013 Page 1 of 15 For the Respondents : Mr Roshan Lal Goel and Ms Mansi Gupta for UOI in W.P.(C) Nos. 6624-25/2012 Ms Saakshi Agrawal and Mr Himanshu Bajaj for UOI in W.P.(C) No.1018/2013 Mr Vijay Kenger for UOI in W.P.(C) No.1797/2013 Mr Sanjay Kumar Patha, Mr Rohit Rai, Ms Jhum Jhum Sarkar, Advoca...
Cephem Milk Specialties Vs. Nutri Chem and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-10-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.REV.P.50/2010 Date of Decision :10. h September, 2013 % CEPHEM MILK SPECIALTIES ..... Petitioner Through : Mr. Sameer Vashisht, Adv. versus NUTRI CHEM & ORS. Through : ..... Respondents Mr. Anurag Jain, Adv. for R-1 and 2. CORAM :HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The petitioner has challenged the order dated 24th October, 2009 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate whereby the petitioners complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act has been dismissed on the ground of lack of territorial jurisdiction.2. The respondent issued cheque bearing no.207634 dated 2 nd April, 2009 for Rs.14,00,550/-drawn on Cosmos Co-operative Bank Ltd., Pune, S.P. Road Branch, Secunderabad to the petitioner which were dishonoured upon presentation upon being deposited by the petitioner with HDFC Bank, Connaught Circus, New Delhi whereupon the petitioner issued a notice of dishonour dated 23 rd May, 2009 and upon failure of ...
St. Anthonys Senior Secondary School, New Delhi Vs. Radhika Sharma and ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-10-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.6548/2008 10th September, 2013 % ST. ANTHONYS SENIOR SECONDARY SCHOOL, NEW DELHI ......Petitioner Through: Mr. P.P.Khurana, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Jaideep Bedi, Adv. VERSUS RADHIKA SHARMA AND ANR. Through: ...... Respondents Mr. Arvind Nayar, Mr. Pradeep Kumar and Mr. Zartab Anwar, Advocates. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition the petitioner-school impugns the judgment of the Delhi School Tribunal dated 30.7.2008. By the impugned judgment the Tribunal has accepted the appeal filed by the respondent no.1 herein and set aside her dismissal order dated 15.5.2008 passed by the petitioner-school. The dismissal order dated 15.5.2008 was passed observing that the respondent no.1 did not perform satisfactory services during the period of probation and therefore her services were terminated.2. The facts of the case are that the respondent No.1 herei...
Lalit Kumar Bagla Vs. Karam Chand Thapar and Bros. (Cs) Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-09-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:9. h September, 2013 % + RFA 149/2009 LALIT KUMAR BAGLA Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Vaibhav Agnihotri & Ms. Niharika Ahluwalia, Advs. Versus KARAM CHAND THAPAR & BROS. (CS) LTD. .. Respondent Through: Mr. V.K. Sharma, Adv. CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. This appeal impugns the judgment and decree dated 25 th February, 2009 (of the Court of Addl. District Judge, Delhi in CS No.75/2008) in favour of the respondent, of recovery of principal sum of Rs.5 lacs together with Rs.55,000/- towards interest till the date of institution of the suit and interest pendente lite and future @ 6% per annum, from the appellant/defendant.2. Notice of the appeal was issued and subject to the deposit by the appellant/defendant of the entire decretal amount in this Court, the execution stayed. The appellant/defendant preferred SLP (Civil) No.14282/2009 to the Supreme Court against the said order but which was di...
Sompal @ Sonu @ Sagar Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-09-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: September 09, 2013 + CRL.APPEAL NO:183/2004 SOMPAL @ SONU @ SAGAR .....Petitioner Represented by: Ms.Saahila Lamba, Advocate/Amicus Curiae. versus STATE Represented by: .....Respondent Mr.Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel (Crl.) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. Since none appears for the appellant Ms.Saahila Lamba, Advocate on the panel of Delhi High Court Legal Services Committee has been requested to assist the Court on behalf of the appellant.2. Fee of learned Amicus Curiae Ms.Saahila Lamba, Advocate shall be paid by the Delhi High Court Legal Services Committee.3. Judgment dated January 03, 2004, passed by the learned Sessions Judge convicting appellant Sompal and co-accused Alam for having committed offence punishable under Section 392 and 397 IPC is under challenge. Vide order on sentence dated January 14, 2004, appellant and coaccused Alam have been sentenced to undergo imprison...
- ‹ Prev
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 56
- Next ›
- Last »