Delhi Court September 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S Walia Destination Vs. M/S Road Gears and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-10-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % CS(OS) 1611/2007 + Date of Decision:10. h September, 2013 # M/S WALIA DESTINATION .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Sanjay Sharma, Advocate $ * Versus M/S ROAD GEARS & ORS. ..... Defendants Through: None(ex parte) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K.BHASIN JUDGMENT P.K.BHASIN, J: This is a suit for recovery of money on account of price of goods sold by the plaintiff between to defendant no.1 firm, which as per the case of the plaintiff is a partnership firm of defendant nos. 2 and 3.2. Defendant no.1 had allegedly been regularly purchasing from the plaintiff car accessories like car seat covers, solar films, car perfumes etc. in which items the plaintiff was dealing. During the period from 1st April,2004 till 20th July,2004 the defendants purchased goods in respect of which various bills were raised by the plaintiff in which one of the terms of payment was that payment was to be made within 15 days from the date of delivery of the goods purchased else i...
Smt. Ram Pati Vs. State and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-10-2013
$-16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :10. h SEPTEMBER, 2013 + CRL.A. 26/2013 SMT. RAM PATI ..... Appellant Through : Mr.I.J.S.Gulati, Advocate. versus STATE & ORS. ..... Respondents Through : Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.Garg, J.(Open Court) 1. Smt. Ram Pati (the appellant) challenges a judgment dated 20.07.2012 of learned Metropolitan Magistrate by which the respondent Nos. 2 to 8 were acquitted of the charges under Section 498A/406/34 IPC. I have heard the appellants counsel and have examined the Trial Court record. Learned counsel urged that the Trial Court did not appreciate the evidence of PW-1 (Usha Rani) in true perspective. After recording her examination-in-chief partly on 03.07.2002 she expired on 24.06.2011 and it remained incomplete for various reasons. The Trial Court fell in grave error in not considering her deposition in the judicial proceedings prior to her death.2. Usha Rani was married to respondent No.2 (Ranvir Sing...
Govt. of Nct of Delhi and anr. Vs. Sh. Anil Kumar and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-10-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:10. 09.2013 + W.P.(C) 5665/2013, C.M. APPL.12536/2013 & 12537/2013 GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Petitioners Through : Sh. Arjun Pant, Advocate. versus SH. ANIL KUMAR & ORS. ..... Respondents Through : Dr. K.S. Chauhan, Sh. Ajit Kumar Ekka and Sh. Ravi Prakash, Advocates, for Resp. No.1. Sh. Naresh Kaushik and Ms. Aditi Gupta, Advocates, for UPSC. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % C.M. NO.12536/2013 (for exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 5665/2013, C.M. NO.12536/2013 (for stay) 1. The Govt. of NCT of Delhi claims to be aggrieved by the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) dated 09.01.2013 by which the first respondents application for appropriate directions to quash the letter of 29.09.2011, addressed to the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) by the Govt. of NCT of Delhi, was allowed. The Govt. of NCT...
Sh Latafat (Painter) Vs. the Mcd and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-10-2013
* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + R.S.A. No.207 of 2013 Decided on :10. h September, 2013 SH LATAFAT (PAINTER) Through: Appellant Mr. Charan Singh & Mr. S.C. Sharma, Advocates. Versus THE MCD & ORS. Through: Respondents Mr. Amandeep Joshi, Advocate for R-1. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.(ORAL) C.M. No.14158/2013 (for delay) 1. This is an application seeking condonation of 24 days delay in filing the appeal.2. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed and delay of 24 days in filing the appeal is condoned as sufficient cause has been shown.3. The application stands disposed of. R.S.A. No.207/2013 & C.M. No.14157/2013 (for stay) 1. This is a regular second appeal under Section 100 CPC against the judgment dated 15.4.2013 passed by the Additional District Judge dismissing the appeal being R.C.A. No.9/2012 of the appellant upholding the judgment and decree dated 3.10.2009 passed by the trial court in Civil Suit No.512/2008.2. Briefly stated,...
Pooja Jha and anr. Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-10-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 1616/2013 Date of Decision:10. h September, 2013 POOJA JHA AND ANR. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Sanjay Kumar and Mr. Krishan Kumar, Advocates. versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Ms. Fizani Husain, APP for the State with ASP Jasvir Singh Malik, PS Ambedkar Nagar and Insp. K.L. Meena. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA ORDER % 1. This is a petition u/s 438 Cr.P.C moved by the petitioners Pooja Jha and Aarti Jha for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.217/13 u/s 341/342/354/323 /506/34 IPC and u/s 3(x) SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, P.S. Sangam Vihar, New Delhi.2. It is alleged in the petition that the facts leading to the registration of the present FIR are that the mother of the petitioners, Mamta Jha lodged a complaint with P.S. Sangam Vihar, pursuant to which FIR No.23/13 dated 20.01.2013 u/s 323/354/452/392/34 IPC was registered against Smt. Baby and Dheeraj amongst others. The present FIR is nothing ...
Meera Maharishi Vs. Vijaya Bank
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-10-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.7393/2012 10th September , 2013 % MEERA MAHARISHI Through: ......Petitioner Mr. Rajesh Benati, Adv. VERSUS VIJAYA BANK Through: ...... Respondent Mr. Kush Sharma and Mr. Ishwar Upreja, Advocates. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition, the petitioner who is the widow of late Sh. Laxmi Narain; an employee of the respondent-bank; seeks that respondent should give ex-gratia payment to the petitioner in accordance with its scheme. Respondent-bank previously had a scheme of compassionate appointment in case of death of an employee in harness, and which was substituted by the extant scheme of grant of ex-gratia payment. Late Sh. Laxmi Narain was working as a telephone operator with the respondentbank.2. The respondent-bank has filed its counter-affidavit. Alongwith the counter-affidavit the scheme in question, application which was filed by the ...
St. Anthony???s Senior Secondary School, New Delhi Vs. Radhika Sharma ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-10-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.6548/2008 10th September, 2013 % ST. ANTHONYS SENIOR SECONDARY SCHOOL, NEW DELHI ......Petitioner Through: Mr. P.P.Khurana, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Jaideep Bedi, Adv. VERSUS RADHIKA SHARMA AND ANR. Through: ...... Respondents Mr. Arvind Nayar, Mr. Pradeep Kumar and Mr. Zartab Anwar, Advocates. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition the petitioner-school impugns the judgment of the Delhi School Tribunal dated 30.7.2008. By the impugned judgment the Tribunal has accepted the appeal filed by the respondent no.1 herein and set aside her dismissal order dated 15.5.2008 passed by the petitioner-school. The dismissal order dated 15.5.2008 was passed observing that the respondent no.1 did not perform satisfactory services during the period of probation and therefore her services were terminated.2. The facts of the case are that the respondent No.1 herei...
Sushil Kumar Malik and ors Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-10-2013
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:10. 09.2013 W.P.(C) 6624/2012 SANJAY KHANNA (HUF) ..... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS + ..... Respondents W.P.(C) 6625/2012 PRAMOD MEHRA ..... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS + ..... Respondents W.P.(C) 1018/2013 DEVINDER MEHRA ..... Petitioner versus UOI AND ORS + ..... Respondents W.P.(C) 1797/2013 SUSHIL KUMAR MALIK AND ORS ..... Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners : WP(C) Nos.6624-25/2012,1018/2013, 1797/2013 Mr N.S. Vasisht in W.P.(C) Nos. 662425/2012 Ms Shoma Chaudhuri in W.P.(C) No.1018/2013 Mr R.S. Rana in W.P.(C) No.1797/2013 Page 1 of 15 For the Respondents : Mr Roshan Lal Goel and Ms Mansi Gupta for UOI in W.P.(C) Nos. 6624-25/2012 Ms Saakshi Agrawal and Mr Himanshu Bajaj for UOI in W.P.(C) No.1018/2013 Mr Vijay Kenger for UOI in W.P.(C) No.1797/2013 Mr Sanjay Kumar Patha, Mr Rohit Rai, Ms Jhum Jhum Sarkar, Advoca...
Ranjeet Kumar Vs. Lt. Governor of Delhi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-10-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.3502/2012 & CM 7373/2012 (Stay) 10th September , 2013 % RANJEET KUMAR Through: ......Petitioner Mr. Anil Kr. Chaudhary, Adv. VERSUS LT. GOVERNOR OF DELHI & ORS. ...... Respondents Through: Ms. Navratn Chaudhary and Ms. T. Pongener, Advs. for R-1 and 2. Mr. R.K.Kapoor and Ms. Rekha Giri, Adv. for R-3. Mr. S.C.Meena, DEO, Zone-27. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition, petitioner who is an employee of the respondent no.3-school seeks the relief for being appointed to the post of LDC by promotion and after holding of DPC. Prayers are made for issuing of directions to conduct the DPC for promoting the petitioner to the post of LDC. I may note that in the prayer clauses there is a typing mistake for holding of the DPC for the post of PGT (English). Counsel for the petitioner admits that this is a typographical error and the prayer is actually ...
Leela Govind Vs. Kerala Education Society Sr. Secondary School Mana
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-10-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.8204/2011 & WP(C) 7170/2011 10th September, 2013 % 1. WP(C) 8204/2011 & CM 18500/2011 (Stay), CM 5803/2012 (interim directions) & CM No.6003/2012 (condonation of delay) LEELA GOVIND Through: ......Petitioner Ms. Indrani Ghosh, Adv. VERSUS KERALA EDUCATION SOCIETY SR. SECONDARY SCHOOL MANAGING COMMITTEE & ORS. ...... Respondents Through: Mr. Romy Chacko, Mr. Varun Mudgal and Ms. Amrita , Advocates for R-1 and 2. Mr. Ashok Agarwal, Adv. for R-3.2. WP(C) 7170/2011 & CM 17932/2011 KERALA EDUCATION SOCIETY ...... Petitioner Through: Mr. Romy Chacko, Mr. Varun Mudgal and Ms. Amrita , Advocates Versus DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION & Ors. ......Respondent Through: Ms. Sana Ansari, Adv. for Ms. Zubeda Begum, Adv. for R-1 and 2. Ms. Indrani Ghosh, Adv. for proposed respondent Mr. Ashok Agarwal, Adv. for R-3. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) WP(C) 8204/2011 1. By this writ pet...
- ‹ Prev
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- Next ›
- Last »