Delhi Court September 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Govt. of Nct of Delhi and ors. Vs. Mahendra Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-09-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: August 27, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: September 09, 2013 + W.P.(C) 4444/2013 GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Petitioners Represented by: Mr.S.P.Sharma, Advocate with Dr.Ashwani Bhardwaj, Advocate versus MAHENDRA SINGH Represented by: .....Respondent Ms.Jasvinder Kaur, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Being selected in the year 2009 to be appointed as a Constable (Driver) in the Delhi Police, required to fill up an Enrollment Form, the respondent filled up the required columns of the Enrollment Form and honestly informed that he was an accused in FIR No.152/1999, P.S.Kotwali, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan for having committed an offence punishable under Sections 19/54 of the Excise Act and Section 353 IPC. He disclosed that he had been acquitted vide judgment dated April 02, 2005.2. Since character and antecedents verification is important ...
Shyam Lal Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-09-2013
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: August 30, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: September 09,2013 W.P.(C) 5111/2011 SHYAM LAL .....Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Anuj Kumar Ranjan, Advocate. versus DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION .....Respondent Represented by: Mr.J.S.Bhasin, Advocate. W.P.(C) 4386/2012 NAR SINGH & ANR. .....Petitioners Represented by: Mr.Anuj Kumar Ranjan, Advocate. versus DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION .....Respondent Represented by: Mr.J.S.Bhasin, Advocate. W.P.(C) 4393/2012 BALWAN SINGH Represented by: .....Petitioner Mr.Anuj Kumar Ranjan, Advocate. versus DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION .....Respondent Represented by: Mr.J.S.Bhasin, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Writ petitioner of WP(C) No.5111/2011, Shyam Lal, was born on November 11, 1955 and was appointed as a Driver with DTC in the year 1984. As per him, during his childhood when he was aged four years, he had su...
Dharmender Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-09-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :19. h August , 2013 DECIDED ON :9. h September, 2013 + CRL.A.143/2011 & Crl.M.B.No.405/2013 DHARMENDER Through : ..... Appellant Mr.R.K.Saxena, Advocate. versus STATE Through : ..... Respondent Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP for the State. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Dharmender (the appellant) has preferred the appeal to impugn conviction by a judgment dated 20.10.2010 of learned Additional Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.97/2009 arising out of FIR No.209/2003 registered at Police Station Keshav Puram by which he was held guilty for committing offence under Section 394 read with 397 IPC. By an order dated 23.10.2010, he was directed to undergo RI for seven years and four months with total fine `5,000/-.2. Allegations against the appellant were that on 20.06.2003 at about 09.45 P.M. at Road No.37, near Bus Stand, Tri Nagar, he, Praveen @ Chilli, Sanjay and Deepak robbed Mukesh Aggarwal of a gold chain CRL.A.143/2011 Page 1 of ...
Karam Chand Vs. Harwinder Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-09-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % E.A. No. 240/2011 in EX.P. 107/2011 Date of Decision:9. h September, 2013 + # KARAM CHAND Through: ..... Decree Holder Mr. Abhishek Puri, Advocate Versus $ * HARWINDER SINGH Through: ..... Judgment Debtor Mr. Suman Kapoor and Mr. Naveen Kumar, Advocates for objector No.2 Mr. Sanjay Jain, Senior Advocate with Mr. Divjyot Singh and Ms. Surbhi Popli, Advocates for objector, M/s Cutting Edge CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K.BHASIN ORDER P.K.BHASIN, J: On receipt of a money decree dated 28th September, 2010 passed by the High Court of Himachal Pradesh in Suit No. 37/2005, Karam Chand vs Harwinder Singh and sent by that Court to this Court in exercise of the powers under Order XX1 Rule 6 of the Code of Civil Procedure(C.P.C. in short) for execution by this Court one Company by the name of M/s Cutting Edge Infrastructure Private Limited (hereinafter to be referred as the the objector) immediately moved the present objection petition under Order XXI Ru...
Nar Singh and anr. Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-09-2013
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: August 30, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: September 09,2013 W.P.(C) 5111/2011 SHYAM LAL .....Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Anuj Kumar Ranjan, Advocate. versus DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION .....Respondent Represented by: Mr.J.S.Bhasin, Advocate. W.P.(C) 4386/2012 NAR SINGH & ANR. .....Petitioners Represented by: Mr.Anuj Kumar Ranjan, Advocate. versus DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION .....Respondent Represented by: Mr.J.S.Bhasin, Advocate. W.P.(C) 4393/2012 BALWAN SINGH Represented by: .....Petitioner Mr.Anuj Kumar Ranjan, Advocate. versus DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION .....Respondent Represented by: Mr.J.S.Bhasin, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Writ petitioner of WP(C) No.5111/2011, Shyam Lal, was born on November 11, 1955 and was appointed as a Driver with DTC in the year 1984. As per him, during his childhood when he was aged four years, he had su...
Vinod Kumar Vs. the State and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-09-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on :30. 08.2013 Judgment pronounced on :09. 09.2013 W.P.(C) 1631/2012 VINOD KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through: Counsel for the petitioner. versus THE STATE & ORS ..... Respondents Through:Mr.Anjum Javed, Advocate for the respondents with Inspector P.S. Naushad. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN V.K. JAIN, J.The only issue involved in this writ petition is as to whether the respondent No.3 was justified in refusing an arm Licence to the petitioner.2. The petitioner submitted an application dated 11.01.2011 for grant of an arm licence, in order to secure his life, property and business activities. The said application was rejected vide order dated 07.03.2011, on the same ground that the petitioner did not have any specific threat. Being aggrieved from the said decision, the petitioner preferred an appeal before the Lieutenant Governor of Delhi. The appeal was rejected on the ground that there was no specific threat to the pe...
Nanak and ors. Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-09-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: September 09, 2013 + CRL.A.NO.359/2004 NANAK & ORS. Represented by: .....Appellants Ms.Saahila Lamba, Advocate/Amicus Curiae versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel (Crl.) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. Since the appeal has reached for hearing and none appears for the appellants I appoint Ms.Saahila Lamba, Advocate, who is on the panelof the Delhi High Court Legal Service Committee as the Amicus Curiae to argue the appeal on behalf of the appellants.2. Fee of the learned Amicus Curiae shall be paid by the Delhi High Court Legal Services Committee.3. The appellants, 5 in number, challenge the impugned judgment and order dated April 26, 2004 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge convicting them for having committed offences punishable under Sections 307 and 323 IPC, read with Section 149 IPC and vide order dated April 27, 2004 senten...
Amit Kumar Pathak Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-09-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:09. 09.2013 W.P.(C) 4685/2013 AMIT KUMAR PATHAK ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Som Dutt Kaushik, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Through: MrAshish Kumar, Adv for MCI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) The petitioner, before this Court, appeared in National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET), 2013, conducted for admission to PG Medical Courses. In the first round of counselling held on 14.06.2013, the petitioner was allotted a seat in respondent No.4-All India Institute of Hygiene and Public Health, Kolkata. On 20.06.2013, the petitioner appeared before the said Institute and was issued an admission letter. The petitioner had expressed his willingness for participation in the second round as well as in the third round of counselling. However, he did not deposit the requisite fee with the respondent No. 4-Institute and thereby did not complete the process of admission.2. The pet...
Mohd Salman Vs. Kishan Lal and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-09-2013
$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:9. h September, 2013 % + MAC.APP. 561/2011 MOHD SALMAN ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Vibha Mahajan Seth, Adv. versus KISHAN LAL & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. S.L. Gupta and Mr. Ram Ashray, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. Instant appeal has been preferred against the impugned award dated 07.01.2011, whereby ld. Tribunal has granted compensation as under: Sl. No. On Account of Amount (Rs.) 1 Towards loss of income as non earning person Rs.7,200/- 2 Expenses towards medical expenses Rs.10,000/- 3 Expenses towards conveyance Rs.10,000/- 4 Expenses towards better diet Rs.10,000/- 5 Expenses towards attendant Rs.5,000/- 6. Expenses towards mental pain and agony. Rs.15,000/- Total Rs.57,200/ 2. It is pertinent to note that the ld. Tribunal has granted recovery rights in favour of insurance company and against respondent nos. 1 & 2, who have not challenged the said finding of the ld...
Rohtash Vs. the State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-09-2013
$* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :9. h SEPTEMBER, 2013 + CRL.A.1255/2012 & CRL.M.B. 1937/2012 ROHTASH ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Mr.P.K.Bhardwaj, Advocate with Mr.N.K.Sharma, Advocate. versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through : ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.Garg, J.(Open Court) 1. Rohtash (the appellant) challenges a judgment dated 16.08.2012 in Sessions Case No. 49/2009 arising out of FIR No. 255/07 PS Dwarka by which he was held guilty for committing offence punishable under Sections 255/256/259/260/420/120B IPC. By an order dated 23.08.2012, he was awarded RI for seven years with fine ` 25,000/under Section 256 IPC and imprisonment for the period already undergone under Section 255/259/260/420/120B with fine ` 25,000/-.2. Allegations against the appellant were that on 10.03.2007 at 11.00 A.M. a secret information was received in the Inter State Cell Crime Branch, Chankaya Puri that Virender Kumar and Hari Narai...
- ‹ Prev
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- Next ›
- Last »