Delhi Court September 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shri Rajinder Kumar Vs. Dtc
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-09-2013
$~22 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % DECIDED ON:09. 09.2013 + LPA 654/2013 CM APPL.13985/2013 SHRI RAJINDER KUMAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr. M. Hussain, Advocate. versus DTC ..... Respondent Through: Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI MR. JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) 1. The appellant is aggrieved by an order dated 22.01.2013 by the learned Single Judge dismissing his writ petition.2. The appellant was appointed by the respondent management Delhi Transport Corporation (DTC) as a Conductor on 08.03.1978. He was issued with the chargesheet on 5.12.2000 alleging that on 7.11.2000 in the course of surprise checking, it was discovered that five ticketless passengers were travelling in the interstate bus journey. Those passengers had claimed that they had paid the full fare to the appellant. The enquiry initiated pursuant to the chargesheet concluded that the charges levelled were proved and the rep...
Bharat Kumar and ors Vs. State and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-09-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:9. h September, 2013 + CS(OS) 1517/2010, IA No.18834/2011 (for condonation of delay), IA No.6254/2012 (u/O 7 R-11), IA No.10409/2012 (for directions) & IA No.12893/2012 (for directions). BHARAT KUMAR Through: ..... Plaintiff Mr. Anil Sapra, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sunil Magon, Adv. versus ASHOK SAHDEV & ORS ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Peeyoosh Kalra with Mr. Omar Siddiqui & Mr. S. Tripathi, Advs. Ms. Bandana Shukla, Adv. for Ms. Ruchi Sindhwani, Adv. for GNCTD. AND + TEST.CAS. 61/2010, IAs No.7488/2012 (u/s 151 CPC) & 2539/2012 (u/O 1.R-3). BHARAT KUMAR & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Anil Sapra, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sunil Magon, Adv. versus STATE & OTHERS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Peeyoosh Kalra, Adv. with Mr. Oman Siddiqui & Mr. Sudhindra Tripathi, Advs. Ms. Bandana Shukla, Adv. for Ms. Ruchi Sindhwani, Adv. for GNCTD. CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J 1.This judgment adjudicates the objec...
Jai NaraIn Vs. Braham Singh and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-09-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: August 08, 2013 Pronounced on: September 09, 2013 + Crl. Rev. P. No. 321/2006 JAI NARAIN Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Digvijay Rai, Advocate versus BRAHAM SINGH & ANR. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Vijender Bhardwaj, Advocate for respondent No.1 Ms. Mukesh Gupta, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.2-State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT 1. Petitioner is the brother of deceased, who is aggrieved by impugned order of 10th February, 2006 vide which respondent No.1accused has been acquitted in FIR No. 485/1997, under Sections 302 of the IPC, registered at police station Punjabi Bagh, Delhi. Holding that prosecution has failed to substantiate the case against respondent No.1accused, the trial court has acquitted first respondent herein.2. The trial court proceeds to acquit respondent No.1-accused by holding that in circumstantial evidence case, the conduct of the respondent No.1-accused militates against his...
Kh.Brojen Singh Vs. Uoi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-09-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on September 05, 2013 Judgment Delivered on September 09, 2013 + W.P.(C) No.1449/2013 KH.BROJEN SINGH Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.L.Roshamani, Advocate versus UOI AND ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Himanshu Bajaj, Advocate for R-1 to R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.1. The petitioner who is a permanent resident of Tendongyan Awang Leikai, Imphal, West District, Manipur, is working in Sashastra Seema Bal (SSB) as Head Constable.2. It is a known fact that the Government of India through Department of Personnel and Training has framed Central Civil Services (Leave Travel Concession) Rules, 1988 for its employees in exercise of powers conferred by the proviso to Article 309 and Clause (5) of Article 148 of the Constitution of India. The salient features of Leave Travel Concession (LTC) are that the same covers the employee and his family. It can be a...
Virender Kumar Rai and anr. Vs. the State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-09-2013
$* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :9. h SEPTEMBER, 2013 + CRL.A.1277/2012 VIRENDER KUMAR RAI & ANR. Through : ..... Appellants Mr.Mr.P.K.Bhardwaj, Advocate with Mr.N.K.Sharma, Advocate. versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through : ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.Garg, J.(Open Court) 1. Virender Kumar Rai (the appellant) challenges a judgment dated 16.08.2012 in Sessions Case No. 49/2009 arising out of FIR No. 255/07 PS Dwarka by which he was held guilty for committing offences punishable under Sections 255/256/259/260/420/120B/170/420/468/473/ 489D & 489/120B IPC. By an order dated 23.08.2012, he was directed to (a) undergo sentence for period already undergone with fine ` 25,000/under Sections 255/259/260/420/120B IPC and in default of payment of fine to undergo SI for six months; (b) RI for seven years with fine ` 25,000/- under Section 256 IPC and in default of payment of fine to undergo SI for six months; (c) RI for ...
Smt Shakuntala Vs. Shivji
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-09-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:09. 09.2013 + CRL.REV.P. 505/2013 SMT SHAKUNTALA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. S.K. Singh, Adv. versus SHIVJI ..... Respondent Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL VEENA BIRBAL, J.* CRL.M.A. No.13415/2013 (exemption) Exemption as prayed is allowed, subject to just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. CRL.M.A. No.13416/2013 (condonation of delay) There is a delay of 21 days in refiling the appeal. In view of the reasoning given, delay in refiling the appeal is condoned. Application stands disposed of. CRL.REV.P. No.505/2013 1. The challenge has been made to order dated 15.4.2013 passed by the learned Family Court Judge, Delhi whereby maintenance @ `3,000/- p.m. has been awarded to the petitioner/wife in the proceedings under Section 125 Cr.P.C.2. The parties were married to each other on 17.5.1995 at Delhi. After marriage, they lived together as husband and wife. No child is born from their wedlock. Petitioner...
Soora Uppalaiah and ors. Vs. Union of India and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-09-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) Nos.2540 /2007, 3940/2007, 3035/2007 & 6854/2007 9th September, 2013 % 1. W.P.(C) No.2540 /2007 SOORA UPPALAIAH AND ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. D.K. Thakur, Advocate. Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. Through:2. ..... Respondents Mr. Jatan Singh, CGSC with Mr. Soayib Qureshi, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. Lokesh Kumar Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.2. W.P.(C) No.3940/2007 PESARU DHARMA REDDY AND ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. D.K. Thakur, Advocate. Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. Through: W.P.(C) Nos.2540/2007&conn. matters ..... Respondents Mr. Jatan Singh, CGSC with Mr. Soayib Qureshi, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. Lokesh Kumar Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.2. Page 1 o3. W.P.(C) No.3035/2007 KUMBABAM VENKAIAH Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. D.K. Thakur, Advocate. Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. Through:4. ..... Respondents Mr. Jatan Singh, CGSC with Mr. Soayib Qureshi, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. Lokesh...
Shri Subhash Chand Dass Vs. Shri Ram Gopal Aggarwal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-09-2013
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RSA 182/2013 SHRI SUBHASH CHAND DASS Through: ..... Appellant Mr.Puneet Verma, Advocate. versus SHRI RAM GOPAL AGGARWAL Through: ..... Respondent Mr.S.N.Gupta and Mr.S.S.Shukla, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI ORDER 09 09.2013 % 1. This is a regular second appeal filed by the appellant against the judgment dated 20.07.2013 passed by the learned ADJ in RCA No. 5/2013 upholding the judgment and decree dated passed by the Civil Judge.2. The learned counsel for the appellant has stated that two substantial questions of law are arising from the present appeal. The first question is that the suit filed by the respondent/plaintiff was barred by Section 50 of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 as the rent of the premises in question was less than Rs.3,500/- and the second question being that the appellant/defendant was entitled to raise the question of title so far as the respondent/plaintiff being the owner in respect of the first...
Kailash Chand JaIn Vs. Management of Cambridge Primary School and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-09-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No. 1805/2012 & CM No. 4028/2012 (delay) 9th September, 2013 % KAILASH CHAND JAIN Through: ......Petitioner Mr. Vivek Sheel and Mr. S. Rao, Adv. VERSUS MANAGEMENT OF CAMBRIDGE PRIMARY SCHOOL & ANR. ...... Respondents Through: Mr. Trideep Pais, Adv. for R-1. Ms. Ferida Satarwala and Mr. Omar Siddiqui, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) CM No.4028/2012 (Delay) For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed and delay is condoned. CM stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 1805/2012 1. Petitioner seeks two reliefs. First relief is for enhancement of the subsistence allowance from 50% to 75%. The second relief which is claimed is the challenge to the alleged illegal continuation of suspension after 90 days from the date of suspension order dated 11.6.2005.2. It may be noted that this writ petition was filed in March, 2012, and the impugned orde...
M/S New Howrah Transport Company Vs. M/S D.M.H.P. Sales Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-09-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA(OS) 85/2009 M/S NEW HOWRAH TRANSPORT COMPANY .....Appellant Through: Mr.Ashok Bhasin, Senior Advocate with Mr.Sunklan Porwal, Mr.Anubhav Bhasin and Mr.Arav Kapoor, Advocates. versus M/S D.M.H.P. SALES LTD. Through: % ..... Respondent Mr.M.Dutta, Advocate. Date of Decision :09. 09.2013 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REVA KHETRAPAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRATIBHA RANI, J 1.We are constrained to adopt a rather unusual way to deal with the present RFA by not giving a brief summary of facts but by extracting para 1 to 11 of the plaint. The purpose is to enable us and the reader of this judgment to assimilate the facts as pleaded without any editing by the authors of this judgment.2. The Plaintiff company M/s D.M.H.P. Sales Ltd. filed a suit bearing CS(OS) No.1701/2003 against M/s New Howrah Transport Company Defendant No.1 (Appellant herein) and Rajdhani Interstate Transport Co. (Regd.) Defendant No.2, praying for a decree of possessi...
- ‹ Prev
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 60
- Next ›
- Last »