Delhi Court September 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bharat Rai Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-10-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:10. 09.2013 + W.P.(C) 3537/2010 BHARAT RAI Through: .... Petitioner Mr. Ashutosh Thakur & Mr. Neeraj Shekhar, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Vikram Aditya Narayan, Adv. for Mr. Sachin Datta, CGSC for R-1 & 3. Mr. B.S. Mor & Mr. Nayyar K., Advs. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) The respondents 1 & 3 do not wish to file any counter affidavit. Counter affidavit of respondent No.2 is already on record. Heard. The petitioner before this Court is the Founder-President of a Society called International Society for Conservation of Natural Resources. On 10.12.2004 Indian Council of Agricultural Research (for short ICAR) applied for grant of financial assistance for holding an International Symposium on Integrated Management of Fungal Disease (IMF). In anticipation of the said approval, the Society held the proposed seminar on 24.2.2005. The request of the Socie...
Ex.Const.Jagdish Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-10-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: August 06, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: September 10, 2013 + W.P.(C) 5887/2005 EX- CONST.JAGDISH Represented by: ...Petitioner Ms.Manpreet Kaur, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Represented by: .....Respondents Mr.Sushil Dutt Salwan, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. On February 24, 2002, ASI Om Prakash PW-2, on duty at P.S.Rajouri Garden was handed over DD No.22, Ex.PW-2/A , wherein the Duty Officer had recorded that through wireless message he had received information that `500/- and a mobile phone was snatched from a person proceeding from Rajouri Garden to Punjabi Bagh. He conducted investigation and recorded action taken as per DD No.27, Ex.PW-2/B, that under the flyover at Raja Garden crossing he had met one Rajat Mittal who confirmed to him of being robbed of `500/- and a mobile phone by a person posing as a policeman on a motorcyc...
Dinesh Kumar and anr Vs. Union of India and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-10-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:10. 09.2013 W.P.(C) 5527/2013 & CM 12314-15/2013 DINESH KUMAR & ANR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Brijender Chahar, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Adesh Kumar Gill, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Jaswinder Singh, Adv. for R-1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) Vide letter dated 27.6.2013, GM(Retail), Meerut, Office of the respondentBharat Petroleum Corporation Limited (BPCL) informed the District Supply Officer, Saharanpur, Uttar Pradesh that they had awarded ad hoc dealership to Mr. Ashok Kumar (petitioner no.2 before this Court) in the name and style of M/s Ashok Filling Station at Village Ghunna, Teshil Maheshwari, District Saharanpur, Uttar Pradesh and requested him to issue diesel selling license in favour of the said frim. Vide subsequent communication dated 14.12.2004, the Meerut office of BPCL informed the GM (Retail), North of the said company that the aforesaid firm...
Shri Rakesh Kumar Agarwal Vs. Bansal Commodities and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-10-2013
$~6 & 7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:02. 07.2013 Decided on:10. 09.2013 + RFA(OS) 92/2009, C.M. APPL.15171/2009 SHRI RAKESH KUMAR AGARWAL ..... Appellant versus BANSAL COMMODITIES & ORS + RFA(OS) 17/2010, APPL.3611/2010 C.M. ..... Respondents APPL.3608/2010 & C.M. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-XIII ..... Appellant versus BANSAL COMMODITIES & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Sh. Sanjeev Rajpal, Advocate, [for Resp. No.2 in Item No. 6 and for appellant in Item No.7). Sh. V.N. Jha and Sh. Shashwat Bajpai, Advocates (Item Nos.6 and7) Sh. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Mahendra Rana, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT RFA (OS) 92/09 & RFA (OS) 17/10 Page 1 % C.M. APPL.3608/2010 (for condonation of delay in filing) IN RFA(OS) 17/2010 For the reasons mentioned in the application, C.M. Appl. 3608/2010 is allowed. RFA(OS) 92/2009, C.M. APPL.15171/2009 RFA(OS) 17/2010, C.M. APPL.3611/2010...
Sh. Mahendera Verma Vs. Sh. Suresh T. Kilachand
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-10-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :17. 07.2013 Pronounced on :10. 09.2013 + CS(OS) 2220/2007 & IA Nos.5576/2012 & 15907/2012 SH. MAHENDERA VERMA Through ..... Plaintiff Mr.Sumesh Dhawan and Ms.Vatsala Kak Panda, Advocates versus SH. SURESH T. KILACHAND ..... Defendant Through None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.1. The present suit is filed for recovery of Rs. 40 lacs. The defendant had entered appearance and filed his written statement. The plaintiff led his evidence PW1 and PW2 and the witnesses were cross-examined by the defendant. However, before the defendant could lead his evidence, he has expired. His legal heirs have been impleaded. The legal heirs were served through publication. None had appeared for them and hence, they had been proceeded ex parte.2. Arguments were heard and judgment was reserved. The plaintiff was given an opportunity to file his written submissions. No written submissions have been filed.3. It is the contention of ...
Himani Sharma Vs. University of Delhi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-10-2013
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:10. 09.2013 W.P.(C) 5413/2013 HIMANI SHARMA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Ravi Gupta, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Ankit Gupta, Advs. versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Varun Kumar and Mr. Anmol Singh, Advs. for R-2 Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Adv. for University of Delhi. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) The petitioner before this Court took admission in B.Com (Hon) of Delhi University, in respondent no.2- Aditi Mahavidhalya situated at Auchandi Road, Bawana, Delhi. The petitioner vide application dated 26.8.2013 applied to respondent no.3-Shri Guru Gobind Singh College, Pitampura, Delhi, seeking migration to the said college in the third semester of B.Com (Hons), on the ground that her residence had changed and the said college was nearer to her residence. The respondent no.3- Shri Guru Gobind Singh College granted No Objection to the petitioner on the same date. Vide applica...
Brite Advertising and Marketing Vs. Public Works Department (Pwd) and ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-10-2013
$~46,10,14,23 to 28 and 40&41 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:10. 09.2013 W.P.(C) 5118/2013 & CM 11517/2013 M/S BRITE NEON SIGNS PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Alok Gupta, Adv. versus PUBLIC WORKS DEPTT. & ANR Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Pinky Anand, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Mini Pushkarna, Standing Counsel and Ms. Namrata Sharma, Advs. for MCD W.P.(C) 869/2012 BRITE NEON SIGNS PVT LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Alok Gupta, Adv. versus PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (PWD) & ANR ..... Respondent Through: + Mr. Amar Nath Saini, Adv. Ms. Pinky Anand, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Mini Pushkarna, Standing Counsel and Ms. Namrata Sharma, Advs. for MCD W.P.(C) 2524/2013 & CM 4782/2013 M/S TRIPLE ESS COMMUNICATION PVT. LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Abul Sattar, Adv. versus PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT AND ANR Through: W.P.(C) 5118/2013&other connected matters ..... Respondent Mr. Amiet Andlay and Mr. Arun K. Sharma, + + + Ms. Pinky Anand, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Mini Pushkarna, ...
Brite Neon Signs Pvt Ltd Vs. Public Works Department (Pwd) and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-10-2013
$~46,10,14,23 to 28 and 40&41 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:10. 09.2013 W.P.(C) 5118/2013 & CM 11517/2013 M/S BRITE NEON SIGNS PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Alok Gupta, Adv. versus PUBLIC WORKS DEPTT. & ANR Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Pinky Anand, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Mini Pushkarna, Standing Counsel and Ms. Namrata Sharma, Advs. for MCD W.P.(C) 869/2012 BRITE NEON SIGNS PVT LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Alok Gupta, Adv. versus PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (PWD) & ANR ..... Respondent Through: + Mr. Amar Nath Saini, Adv. Ms. Pinky Anand, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Mini Pushkarna, Standing Counsel and Ms. Namrata Sharma, Advs. for MCD W.P.(C) 2524/2013 & CM 4782/2013 M/S TRIPLE ESS COMMUNICATION PVT. LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Abul Sattar, Adv. versus PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT AND ANR Through: W.P.(C) 5118/2013&other connected matters ..... Respondent Mr. Amiet Andlay and Mr. Arun K. Sharma, + + + Ms. Pinky Anand, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Mini Pushkarna, ...
Siddharth Bansal Vs. University of Delhi and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-10-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:10. 09.2013 W.P.(C) 2396/2013 & CM Nos.4533/2013 & 5983/2013 SIDDHARTH BANSAL ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. P.S. Bindra, Adv. versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI AND ANR Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Adv. for Delhi University CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) The petitioner before this Court, after completing his B.E. applied to the MBA, Faculty of Management Studies, University of Delhi for the academic year 2013-2015. The Prospectus, containing various terms and conditions applicable to such admissions, to the extent it is relevant reads as under: The OBC candidates who belong to the Non-Creamy Layer and whose castes appear in the Central List of the OBCs (as on the date of application to the programme and on the day of interview), only shall be eligible to be considered for admission under the OBC Category. Creamy Layer OBC candidates should apply as General category. No change o...
Om Prakash Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-10-2013
$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % W.P.(C)No.4286/2013 Reserved on :5. h September, 2013 Date of decision :10. h September, 2013 OM PRAKASH Through : ..... Petitioner Mr. Narender Kaushik, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through : ..... Respondents Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO GITA MITTAL, J.1. By way of the present writ petition, the petitioner has assailed the order dated 27th April, 2012 passed by the Armed Forces Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi rejecting the petitioners challenge to the order dated 30th April, 2003 passed by the Chief of the Air Staff on the basis of general court martial revising its findings and the order dated 6th May, 2003 passed by the confirming authority and the order of rejection of the petitioners appeal filed under Section 161(2) of the Air Force Act.2. To the extent necessary, the relevant facts are noted hereafter. The petitioner was recruited as Airman in the T...
- ‹ Prev
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 54
- Next ›
- Last »