Delhi Court September 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
State Vs. Mohd. Iqbal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-09-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:9. h September, 2013 + CRL.L.P. 472/2013 STATE Through: ..... Petitioner Ms. Rajdipa Behura, APP for the State. versus MOHD. IQBAL ..... Respondent Through: Nemo. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL J.(ORAL) CRL.M.A. 13466/2013 & CRL.M.A. 13467/2013 (delay) 1. Crl.M.A.13466/2013 has been filed by the State seeking condonation of 70 days delay in filing the present petition for leave to appeal and Crl.M.A.13467/2013 has been filed by the State seeking condonation of 72 days delay in re-filing the present petition for leave to appeal.2. Heard. For the reasons stated in the applications, present applications are allowed. Delay in filing and re-filing the petition for leave to appeal is condoned.3. Applications stand disposed of. CRL.L.P. 472/2013 4. By this petition under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (the Code), the State seeks leave to appeal against ...
Shaheed Udham Singh Smarak Shiksha Samiti (Regd.) Vs. Suman Lata and o ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-09-2013
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) Nos. 3723/2012 & 193/2011 9th September, 2013 % 1. W.P.(C) No.3723/2012 SHAHEED UDHAM SINGH SMARAK SHIKSHA SAMITI (REGD.) AND ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. B.B. Gupta, Advocate with Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Advocate. Versus SUMAN LATA AND ORS. Through:2. ..... Respondents Mr. Brijesh Kumar Gupta, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 to 3. Mr. Kushal Yadav, Advocate for respondent No.4. W.P.(C) No.193 /2011 SHAHEED UDHAM SINGH SMARAK SHIKSHA SAMITI (REGD.) AND ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. B.B. Gupta, Advocate with Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Advocate. Versus SMT. SANTOSH VERMA AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Brijesh Kumar Gupta, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 to 3. Mr. Vibhav Misra, Advocate for respondent No.4. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. Yes VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) W.P.(C) No.3723/2012 and C.M. Nos.7805/2012 (stay), 12296/2012 (release of amount), 16361/2012 and 3650/2013 (subsistence...
Manohar Lal Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-09-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.6456/2012 & CM No.17153/2012 (interim relief) 9th September, 2013 % MANOHAR LAL Through: ......Petitioner Sh. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Indrani Ghosh, Ms. Jagriti Ahuja and Mr. Vishesh Wadhwa, Advocates. VERSUS GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ...... Respondents Through: Mr. Rakesh Tikku, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Puneet Mittal, Mr. Ankur Aggrawal and Mr. Nitin Sharma, Advocates for R-4,5,6,8,9 & 11. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. Yes VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition, the petitioner who is a teacher in the Delhi Public School, Mathura Road, New Delhi (represented by respondent nos. 5 and 6 and hereinafter referred to as respondent-school), seeks the quashing of the letter dated 31.5.2012 issued by the respondent-school approving extension of services of the respondent no.11, who is the Principal, for three years w.e.f 1.7.2012. WPC 6456/2012 The letter dated 31.5.20...
Raj Kumar (Through Parokar) Vs. State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-09-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.REV.P.No.340/2013 Decided on 09.09.2013 IN THE MATTER OF : RAJ KUMAR (THROUGH PAROKAR) ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rambir Chauhan, Advocate versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Naveen Sharma, APP for State CORAM HONBLE MS.JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HIMA KOHLI, J.(Oral) 1. The present revision petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 397 read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying inter alia for setting aside the judgment dated 31.5.2013 passed by the appellate court in Appeal No.81/2012, whereby the judgment on conviction dated 21.8.2012 passed by the learned MM was upheld and the order on sentence dated 19.11.2012 was modified. By the impugned judgment, the appellant court had concurred with the trial court and held that the petitioner is liable for the offence punishable under Sections 354/34 IPC. However, the sentence of rigorous imprisonment for one year imposed on the petitioner by the trial court was reduced to...
National Insurance Co. Ltd. Q Vs. Pramod Kumar Sharma and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-09-2013
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:9th September, 2013 % + MAC.APP. 673/2006 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Shantha Devi Raman, Advocate. Versus PRAMOD KUMAR SHARMA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Saurabh Kansal, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 3 and 4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. The present appeal is directed against the impugned order dated 17.04.2006 passed by the learned Tribunal.2. It is pointed out that service upon respondent No.1 was dispensed with vide order dated 17.07.2007 and respondent Nos. 2 to 4 were proceeded ex parte.3. Vide order dated 14.05.2013, this Court issued the court notices against the respondents through their counsels.4. Pursuant thereto respondent Nos. 3 and 4 appeared on 23.07.2013 and on their request, the Secretary, Delhi High Court Legal Services Committee was directed to provide them a counsel. Accordingly, Mr. Saurabh Kansal, learned counsel appointed a...
Jindal Stainless Limited Vs. India Government Mint
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-06-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:27. 08.2013 Pronounced on:06. 09.2013 % + W.P.(C) No.5146/2013, C.M. 11569/2013 JINDAL STAINLESS LIMITED .... Petitioner Through: Mr. Soli Sorabjee, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Rajiv Nayyar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Gopal Jain, Mr. Abhimanyu Bhandari, Ms. Samanvya D. Dwivedi and Mr. Shaunak Kashyap, Advocates. versus INDIA GOVERNMENT MINT ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Laxmi Chauhan, Advocate for Union of India. Mr. Vikas Goel, Ms. Neha Goyal and Mr. Kunal Dutta, Advocates for SPMCIL. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI MR. JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT % WP(C) No.5146/2013 Page 1 C.M. 11570/2013 (for exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) No.5146/2013, C.M. 11569/2013 (for stay) 1. In the present proceeding under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, a direction is sought that the condition contained in Section IX (4)(b), of the tender (issued by the respondent, India Government Min...
Rajkumar @ Babloo Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-06-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :8. h July, 2013 DECIDED ON :6. h September, 2013 + CRL.A. 542/2012 RAJKUMAR @ BABLOO Through : ..... Appellant Mr.Chetan Lokur, Advocate. versus STATE Through : ..... Respondent Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP. ` CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Rajkumar @ Babloo (the appellant) challenges a judgment dated 20.11.2010 of learned Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.51/2008 arising out of FIR No.11/2005 registered at Police Station Uttam Nagar by which he along with Malkiat Singh, Charan Singh and Nand Kishore @ Sanjay was convicted for committing offences punishable under Sections 394/395 read with Section 397 IPC. By an order dated 22.11.2010, he was sentenced to undergo RI for ten years with fine `5,000/- under Section 394 IPC and RI for ten years with fine `5,000/- under Section 395 read with Section 397 IPC.2. Allegations against the appellant were that on 04.01.2005, he and his associates con-jointly committed dacoity at Pawans hous...
Mrs. Neelam Chopra Vs. Panna Lal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-06-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % RESERVED ON:17. 07.2013 PRONOUNCED ON:06. 09.2013 + FAO (OS) 573/2009 MRS. NEELAM CHOPRA ..... Petitioner Through : Mr. Tanmaya Mehta, Advocate. versus PANNA LAL ..... Respondents Through : Mr. Prakash Gautam, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI MR. JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT 1 The appellant (hereafter referred to by her name Neelam Chopra) claims to be aggrieved against the order of the learned Single Judge dated 02.09.2009 (impugned order) to the extent that it directs the respondent (hereafter referred to as Panna Lal) to pay ` 50,000/- as use and occupation charges in respect of Shop No.58B, Khan Market, New Delhi (hereafter referred to as suit premises). The dispute which is the subject matter of the present appeal is a part of a series of litigation between Neelam Chopra and Panna Lal; the acrimony has led to both civil as well as criminal proceedings. Panna Lal filed the suit no.574/20...
New India Assurance Co Ltd Vs. Harpal Singh and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-06-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:19. h July, 2013 Pronounced on:6. h September, 2013 + MAC.APP. 138/2011 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. K.L. Nandwani, Advocate with Mr. Vaidant Chadha, Advocate versus HARPAL SINGH & ORS Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Navneet Goyal, Advocate for R-1. MAC.APP. 143/2011 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. K.L. Nandwani, Advocate with Mr. Vaidant Chadha, Advocate versus SATTO & ORS Through: + ..... Respondents Mr. Navneet Goyal, Advocate for R-1 MAC.APP. 744/2011 SATTO & ORS Through: ..... Appellants Mr. Navneet Goyal, Advocate versus NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. K.L. Nandwani, Advocate with Mr. Vaidant Chadha, Advocate + MAC.APP. 30/2012 HARPAL SINGH & ORS Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Navneet Goyal, Advocate versus NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. K.L. Nandwani, Advocate with Mr. Vaidant Chadha, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MIT...
Raj Kanwar and ors. Vs. Union of India and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-06-2013
$~1, 11 & 12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision : September 06, 2013 + W.P.(C) 5539/2013 JAIPAL SINGH AND ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr.Ankur Chibber, Adv. versus UOI AND ORS Through: + ..... Respondents Mr.Neeraj Chaudhari, CGSC for UOI W.P.(C) 4258/2013 GAJRAJ SINGH & ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr.Ankur Chibber, Adv. versus + UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Yogesh Yogi, Adv. for Mr.Joginder Sukhija, Adv. for R-1 to R-4 W.P.(C) 5059/2013 RAJ KANWAR & ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr.Ankur Chibber, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS .... Respondents Through: Mr.Jatan Singh, CGSC and Mr.S.Qureshi, Adv. for UOI CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO W P (C) 5539/13, WP(C) 4258/13 & WP(C) 5059/13 1 of 15 GITA MITTAL, J.(Oral) W.P.(C) 4258/2013 It is to be noted that by an error, presence of counsels on the 9 th July, 2013 and 3rd September, 2013 has been erroneously recorded. Mr.Ankur Chibber, Advo...
- ‹ Prev
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 61
- Next ›
- Last »