Delhi Court September 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ms. Shalini Sethi Vs. Union of India and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-02-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No. 3094/2010 % 2nd September, 2013 MS. SHALINI SETHI Through: ..... Petitioner Ms. Vibha Mahajan Seth, Advocate. Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Neeraj Chaudhari, CGSC with Mr. Ravjyot Singh, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. Rajeev Mehra, ASG with Mr. Sanjay Bhatt, Advocate for respondent No.2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition, the petitioner impugns the termination of her contractual services by the respondent No.2/IDBI Bank Limited. Petitioner is an orthopedically handicapped person with 48% locomoter disability.2. Petitioner was given contractual employment in the quota for persons with disabilities. She was appointed as an Executive on 26.11.2007 for a period of one year. Petitioners contract was not renewed in terms of the letter dated 25.11.2008 of the respondent No.2. Petitioner claims that after be...
Kherunisha Vs. Br Sharma and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-02-2013
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:02. d September, 2013 MAC.APP. 706/2012 KHERUNISHA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Manoj Sharma, Mr. S.A. Rao and Mr. Saurabh Sharma, Advs. versus BR SHARMA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Adv. for R1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. Instant appeal has been preferred against the impugned award dated 01.03.2012, whereby ld. Tribunal granted compensation of Rs.1,45,720/with interest @ 7.5% from the date of the petition till realization.2. Vide the instant appeal, appellant is seeking enhancement of the aforesaid award amount on the ground that the appellant was earning Rs.4,500/- per month by doing beading work for an export house, which was dealing in garments.3. In the accident in question, appellant suffered permanent physical disability of 16% in relation to right lower limb. Ld. Tribunal considered loss of wages at 5%.4. Ld. Counsel for the appellant submits the l...
Ashish Kumar Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-02-2013
$~ 7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 307/2013, CM Nos. 644/2013 & 12285/2013 Date of decision:2. d September, 2013 % ASHISH KUMAR Through : ..... Petitioner Mr. Ashish, Adv. for Mr. M.K. Bhardwaj, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Through : Mr. Amit Pal Singh, Adv. for R-1 to 3. CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI GITA MITTAL, J.(Oral) CM No.12285/2013 By this application , the respondents prays for condonation of delay in filing the counter affidavit. For the reasons stated, the delay is condoned. This application is allowed. W.P.(C) 307/2013 & CM No. 644/2013 1. In the instant case, the petitioner is aggrieved by the failure of the respondents to conduct a Review Medical Board despite his request for the same. The petitioner had participated in the recruitment undertaken by the respondents for the post of SubWP(C) No.307/2013 page 1 of 6 Inspector in Central Armed Police Force and Assistant SubInspector in the ...
Shree Hari Diagnostics Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Sh. Manohar Lal Sethi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-02-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Order delivered on: September 02, 2013 CM(M) No.877/2013 SHREE HARI DIAGNOSTICS PVT LTD ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Rajat Navet, Adv. with Mr.Gaurav Sharma, Adv. versus SH MANOHAR LAL SETHI & ORS Through None. + ..... Respondents CM(M) No.882/2013 SHREE HARI DIAGNOSTICS PVT LTD ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Rajat Navet, Adv. with Mr.Gaurav Sharma, Adv. versus SH MANOHAR LAL SETHI & ORS Through None. ..... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(ORAL) CM No.13444/2013 & CM No.13431/2013 Exemption allowed, subject to just exceptions. The applications are disposed of. CM(M) 877/2013 & CM No.13432/2013 CM(M) 882/2013 & CM No.13445/2013 1. By way of the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has assailed order dated 15 th April 2013 passed by ADJ, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in a suit for recovery of possession and recovery of arrears of rental and use and occupation charges/ d...
State Vs. Prem Singh @ Fauzi and anr..
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-02-2013
$~05. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.L.P. 38/2006 % Judgment dated 02.09.2013 STATE ..... Petitioner Through : Ms.Rajdipa Behura, APP for the State. versus PREM SINGH @ FAUZI & ANR.. ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Anupam Sharma, Advocate with Mr. Javed Akhtar & Mr. Kaushal Kaushik, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) 1. The state seeks leave to appeal against the judgment dated 27.01.2005 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ) in Sessions Case No.7/2001 whereby the respondents (accused before the trial court) were acquitted of the charges punishable under Sections 302/201/34/120-B IPC.2. As per the version of the prosecution, on 16.04.1998 an information was received at P.S. Sameypur Badli and it was recorded vide DD No.30-A at about 10:15 pm that a dead body of a male person was found lying at Khera Kalan road. S.I. V.N. Mishra along with Sudershan Kumar went to the spot. Insp. Mahener Sin...
Sudhir Kumar Vs. State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-02-2013
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Crl. Appeal No.605/2013 Reserved on:14. h May, 2013 Date of Decision:2. d September, 2013 % SUDHIR KUMAR ....Appellant Through Ms. Nandita Rao, Advocate. Versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI Respondent Through Ms. Richa Kapoor, APP. Crl.Appeal No.232/2013 SALMA Appellant Through Ms. Anu Narula, Advocate. Versus STATE Respondent Through Ms. Richa Kapoor, APP. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VED PRAKASH VAISH SANJIV KHANNA, J.These two appeals by Sudhir Kumar and Salma arise from a common judgment and order of sentence dated 11th January, 2012 and 15th February, 2012 respectively. The two appellants have been convicted under Section 302/392/411/34 of the Indian Penal Code 1860 (IPC, for short). They have been sentenced to life imprisonment and fine of Rs.5,000/- each and in default of payment of fine to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three months each, for the offence under Section 302/34 IPC; rigorous imprisonment for fi...
State Vs. Raj Kumar@ Dhanwant and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-02-2013
$~11. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.L.P. 447/2013 % Judgment dated 02.09.2013 STATE Through : ..... Petitioner Mr.Dayan Krishnan, Adv. SI Mohinder Singh, Special Cell. versus RAJ KUMAR@ DHANWANT & ORS Through : NEMO. ..... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) CRL.M.A.12943/2013.1. This is an application filed by the petitioner seeking condonation of 347 days delay in filing the present leave to appeal petition.2. Heard counsel for the petitioner. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. Delay in filing the present leave to appeal is condoned.3. Application stands disposed of. CRL.L.P. 447/2013 4. Present petition for leave to appeal has been filed by the State under Section 378(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the judgment dated 17.5.2012 rendered by Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi, in Sessions Case No.47/2009, arising out of FIR No.11/2009 lodged under Sections 186...
- ‹ Prev
- 61
- 62
- 63
- 64
- 65
- 66
- 67
- 68
- 69
- 70
- Next ›