Delhi Court September 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Cit V Vs. Nasa Finelease P Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-06-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA No. 647/2012 Reserved on:27. h August, 2013 Date of Decision:6. h September, 2013 % CIT V Through Counsel. ....Appellant Mr. Sanjeev Rajpal, Sr. Standing Versus NASA FINELEASE P LTD. Through Respondent Mr. Nageshwar Rao and Mr. Sandeep S. Karhail, Advocates. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJIV KHANNA, J.Revenue, by this appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act 1961 (Act, for short), has raised a solitary issue relating to interpretation of clause (d) to Section 43(5) of the Act. For the purpose of record, we note that the appeal pertains to assessment year 2006-07.2. The respondent-assessee is engaged in the business of dealing in securities and investment and was engaged by Kotak Mahindra Securities to manage their funds and earn income in nature of profits/gains or dividends from dealing with securities. The assessee had received management fee as per contract with Kotak Mahindra Se...
New India Assurance Co Ltd Vs. Satto and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-06-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:19. h July, 2013 Pronounced on:6. h September, 2013 + MAC.APP. 138/2011 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. K.L. Nandwani, Advocate with Mr. Vaidant Chadha, Advocate versus HARPAL SINGH & ORS Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Navneet Goyal, Advocate for R-1. MAC.APP. 143/2011 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. K.L. Nandwani, Advocate with Mr. Vaidant Chadha, Advocate versus SATTO & ORS Through: + ..... Respondents Mr. Navneet Goyal, Advocate for R-1 MAC.APP. 744/2011 SATTO & ORS Through: ..... Appellants Mr. Navneet Goyal, Advocate versus NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. K.L. Nandwani, Advocate with Mr. Vaidant Chadha, Advocate + MAC.APP. 30/2012 HARPAL SINGH & ORS Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Navneet Goyal, Advocate versus NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. K.L. Nandwani, Advocate with Mr. Vaidant Chadha, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MIT...
Satto and ors Vs. New India Assurance Co Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-06-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:19. h July, 2013 Pronounced on:6. h September, 2013 + MAC.APP. 138/2011 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. K.L. Nandwani, Advocate with Mr. Vaidant Chadha, Advocate versus HARPAL SINGH & ORS Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Navneet Goyal, Advocate for R-1. MAC.APP. 143/2011 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. K.L. Nandwani, Advocate with Mr. Vaidant Chadha, Advocate versus SATTO & ORS Through: + ..... Respondents Mr. Navneet Goyal, Advocate for R-1 MAC.APP. 744/2011 SATTO & ORS Through: ..... Appellants Mr. Navneet Goyal, Advocate versus NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. K.L. Nandwani, Advocate with Mr. Vaidant Chadha, Advocate + MAC.APP. 30/2012 HARPAL SINGH & ORS Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Navneet Goyal, Advocate versus NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. K.L. Nandwani, Advocate with Mr. Vaidant Chadha, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MIT...
Commissioner of Income Tax Xiii Vs. Naresh Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-06-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + I.T.A. No. 24/2013 Reserved on:23. d August, 2013 Date of Decision:6. h September, 2013 % Commissioner of Income Tax XIII ....Appellant Through Ms. Suruchi Aggarwal, Sr. Standing Counsel. Versus Respondent Naresh Kumar Through Nemo. ITA No. 218/2013 Commissioner of Income Tax Delhi VI .Appellant Through Ms. Suruchi Aggarwal, Sr. Standing Counsel. Versus M/s Talbros (P) Ltd. .Respondent Through Dr. Rakesh Gupta, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJIV KHANNA, J.These two appeals by Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act (Act, for short) in the case of Naresh Kumar and M/s Talbros (P) Ltd. relate to a common assessment year 2008-09, and raise a common question and, therefore, being disposed of by this common judgment at the stage of admission.2. The contention of the Revenue is that the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (Tribunal, for short) in their impugned orders dated 21st May, 201...
Delhi Judicial Service Association Thr. Its Presid Vs. High Court of D ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-06-2013
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI WRIT PETITION(CIVIL) NO. 3353/2010 Reserved on:22. d August, 2013 Date of decision:6. h September, 2013 DELHI JUDICIAL SERVICE ASSOCIATION THR. ITS PRESIDENT VINOD KUMAR DHJS & ANR. ..... Petitioners Through Mr. Rakesh Tiku, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Vivek Ojha, Advocate. versus HIGH COURT OF DELHI THROUGH ITS REGISTRAR GENERAL & ORS. ..... Respondents Through Mr. Viraj R. Datar, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJIV KHANNA, J.: Delhi Judicial Service Association, petitioner No. 1 has invoked extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for quashing advertisement dated 7 th September, 2009 issued by the High Court of Delhi, respondent No. 1 herein for appointments to 10 posts of Additional District and Sessions Judge by direct recruitment from the Bar. The petitioner has also prayed for quashing of the communication dated 8th April, 2010 by whic...
NitIn Verma Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-06-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A.289/2013 NITIN VERMA Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Sumeet Verma, Advocate versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Ms. Ritu Gauba, APP. AND + Death Sentence Ref.4/2012 STATE Through: ..... Appellant Ms. Ritu Gauba, APP. versus NITIN VERMA Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Sumeet Verma, Advocate Date of Decision :06. h September, 2013 % CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REVA KHETRAPAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : SUNITA GUPTA, J.1. Appellant Nitin Verma in Crl.A No.289/2013 and accused in Death Sentence Ref. No.4/2012 is charged with the commission of offence of patricide, matricide and uxoricide. Vinod Verma, Pushpa Verma and Pooja Verma are the father, mother and wife of appellantaccused.2. Prosecution case emanates from the fact that DD No.5A was recorded in P.S Dwarka on receipt of an information through telephone from G-50 to the effect that 2-3 persons had been killed in House No.136, Gali No.9, Raj Nagar-II. The copy of DD was se...
Harpal Singh and ors Vs. New India Assurance Co Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-06-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:19. h July, 2013 Pronounced on:6. h September, 2013 + MAC.APP. 138/2011 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. K.L. Nandwani, Advocate with Mr. Vaidant Chadha, Advocate versus HARPAL SINGH & ORS Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Navneet Goyal, Advocate for R-1. MAC.APP. 143/2011 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. K.L. Nandwani, Advocate with Mr. Vaidant Chadha, Advocate versus SATTO & ORS Through: + ..... Respondents Mr. Navneet Goyal, Advocate for R-1 MAC.APP. 744/2011 SATTO & ORS Through: ..... Appellants Mr. Navneet Goyal, Advocate versus NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. K.L. Nandwani, Advocate with Mr. Vaidant Chadha, Advocate + MAC.APP. 30/2012 HARPAL SINGH & ORS Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Navneet Goyal, Advocate versus NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. K.L. Nandwani, Advocate with Mr. Vaidant Chadha, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MIT...
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. M/S Handicrafts and Handlooms Export Co ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-06-2013
$~ R-47(Part-II-B) * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA 3/2001 % Date of Decision:5. h September, 2013 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Amol Sinha, Adv. versus M/S HANDICRAFTS AND HANDLOOMS EXPORT CORPN. OF INDIA LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kamal Mehta, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJIV KHANNA, J.Revenue by this appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act, for short) which pertains to assessment year 1985-86 submits that grant of Rs. 25 lakhs received by respondent assessee, M/s Handicrafts and Handlooms Exports Corporation of India Ltd. from its holding company State Trading Corporation of India (STC, for short) constitutes revenue receipt and amount received should be taxed as income. By order dated 29th March, 2001, the appeal was admitted and the following substantial question of law was framed:- Whether the tribunal was justified in holding that grant of Rs. 25 Lakhs rec...
Vijay Shankar Shukla Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-06-2013
$~26 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:06. 09.2013 + W.P.(C) 5611/2013 VIJAY SHANKAR SHUKLA ..... Petitioner Through :Sh. A.K. Bhakt, Advocate. Versus UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS ..... Respondents Through : Ms. Sweety Manchanda, CGSC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % 1. The petitioner was unsuccessful in his challenge (before the Central Administrative Tribunal CAT] to the punishment order made pursuant to a remit by this Court in W.P.(C) 4944/2007 on 04.05.2009.2. The brief facts are that the petitioner was charged with misconduct of attempting to pilfer 351 filled milk polypacks of one litre each and 12 empty crates, refusing to sign the Recovery Memo dated 13.08.1993 and allegedly abusing and manhandling of security staff on duty. W.P.(C)5611/2013 Pag3. A common enquiry was held against the petitioner and others. The charge of pilferage and not signing the Recovery Memo was h...
Pooja Kapoor Vs. Director of Education and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-06-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No. 7214/2012 & CM No. 18610/2012 (interim directions) 6th September, 2013 % POOJA KAPOOR ..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Indrani Ghosh, Adv. versus DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION AND ORS Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Sujeet Kr. Singh and Ms. Sonia Arora, Adv. for R-1. Mr. Pramod Gupta, Adv. for R-2 and 3. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. There are four issues in this writ petition. First is for grant of maternity leave benefit to the petitioner. This benefit has already been granted to the petitioner as stated by the respondent nos. 2 and 3.2. The second relief which is claimed is for petitioners son who studies in the respondent no.2-school to get benefit of Rule 125 of the Delhi School Education Rules, 1973. As per Rule 125, petitioner will be entitled to either free education or reimbursement of tuition fee as payable by the Govt. of NCT of Delhi to employees. Sinc...
- ‹ Prev
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 62
- Next ›
- Last »