Court : Supreme Court of India
2024 INSC737REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.4003/2024 ARISING OUT OF SLP (CRL) No.4044 of 2018 KAILASHBEN MAHENDRABHAI PATEL & ORS. ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR. ...RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, J.1. Leave granted.2. This criminal appeal is against the dismissal of a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC to quash the FIR and the subsequent chargesheet against the appellants herein. By order dated 01.05.2018, this Court issued notice in the Special Leave Petition and stayed the criminal proceedings. The short and necessary facts for disposal of this criminal appeal are as follows.3. Respondent No.2 is the complainant. She was married to one Niraj Mahendrabhai Patel in 2002, and he is not a party in these proceedings. On 01.03.2013, the complainant filed a complaint, 1 pursuant to which an FIR was registered on 25.03.2013 at P.S. Jalna, Maharashtra under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 re...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
2024 INSC734Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Appeal Nos.1614-1618 of 2012 Manik & Ors. Appellant(s) Versus The State of Maharashtra. Respondent(s) JUDGMENT C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J.1. In these quintuplet appeals, the appellants- convicts who stood the trial in Sessions Trial No.21 of 1996 before the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Gondia for the charge of commission of offences punishable under Section 302 and/or various other offences under the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short IPC) are challenging the common judgment dated 12.07.2011 in Criminal Appeal Nos. 64, 65, 71, 76, 77 and 88 of 1997 whereby and whereunder their conviction and consequential sentences, handed down by the trial Court except under Section 201 read with Section 34, IPC, were confirmed by the High Court of Bombay, Page 1 of 53 Criminal Appeal Nos.1614-1618 of 2012 Nagpur Bench. For the sake of convenience appellants are referred to hereafter in this judgment in accorda...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
NON-REPORTABLE2024INSC738IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1389 OF2012BALJINDER SINGH @ LADOO AND OTHERS ...APPELLANTS VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB ...RESPONDENT JUDGMENT DIPANKAR DATTA, J.THE APPEAL1 This is an appeal, by special leave, by 4 (four) appellants. They call in question the judgment and order dated 04th May, 20111 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Punjab and Haryana2 dismissing a criminal appeal3 under section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 19734. Such appeal was preferred by the appellants, arraigned as A-1, A-2, A-3 and A-4 in the trial, and a co-accused (A-5). The judgment of conviction and the 1 impugned judgment, hereafter 2 High Court, hereafter 3 Criminal Appeal No.454-DB of 2001 4 Cr. PC, hereafter 1 of 16 order of sentence dated 04th August, 2001, passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Punjab5 in a sessions case6 registered against A-1, A-2, A- 3, A-4 and A-5 was majorly upheld. While A-5 was acquitted,...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
NON-REPORTABLE2024INSC731IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.3327 OF2024SHOYEB RAJA APPELLANT(S) Versus STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS. RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT SANJAY KAROL, J.1. Assailed before us, at the insistence of the complainant, is a judgment and order dated 23rd November, 2023 of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh (Principal Bench at Jabalpur), passed in Criminal Revision No.3125 of 2021, whereby the judgment/order dated 11th November, 2021 in Sessions Trial No.52/2019 of the learned IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Seoni, acquitting the accused- 1|SLP(CRL.16333/2023 Respondents (Nos.2 to9) of the charges under Sections 294, 323, 506, 353, 352 read with Section 34 Indian Penal Code1 was confirmed. BACKGROUND FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY2 The complainant-appellant was appointed as the Chairman of the District Waqf Board, Seoni, thereby being charged with the supervision of Masjid Committees. As a result of the dispute between ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
- 1 - NC:2024. KHC-D:13718 WP No.105292 of 2024 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE25H DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH WRIT PETITION No.105292 OF2024(GM-TEN) BETWEEN: V.P. ENTERPRISES, REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR, MANJAAPPA S/O. NAGAPPA MARAHONNAPPANAVAR, AGE:41. YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O. H.NO.001, ROTSON VENIZIA, VIDYANAGAR HUBLI, DISTRICT: DHARWAD-580001. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. MALLIKARJUNSWAMY B. HIREMATH, ADVOCATE) AND: KARNATKA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, P.B. ROAD, VIDYANAGAR, HUBBALLI, KARNATAKA-580022, BY ITS DIRECTOR. ..RESPONDENT (BY SRI. ARAVIND D. KULKARNI, ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE PAPER PUBLICATION DATED97/2024 ISSUED BY RESPONDENT AT ANNEXURE-C IMPUGNED NOTIFICATION DATED ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT DATED0807.2024 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-D AND ETC. THIS PETITION HAVING BEEN HEARD AND RESERVED FOR O...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
- 1 - NC:2024. KHC:40339 WP No.12683 of 2023 R C/W WP No.12691 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE25H DAY OF SEPTEMBER2024BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA WRIT PETITION No.12683 OF2023C/W WRIT PETITION No.12691 OF2023(S-RES) IN W.P.No.12683/2023: BETWEEN:1. B.J.RANI, W/O RANGANATHA.C., AGED AOBUT42YEARS, WORKING AS STAFF NURSE, JAYADEV INSTITUTE OF CARDIOVASCULAR SCIENCES AND RESEARCH BENGALURU R/AT No.489/A, NISCHITA NILAYA, 2ND MAIN ROAD, NEAR17H CROSS, VISHWAPRIYA LAYOUT, BENGALURU SOUTH-560 068.2. SRI. AYUB KHAN.S.G., S/O GHOUSE KHAN, AGED39YEARS, WORKING AS STAFF NURSE, JAYADEV INSTITUTE OF CARIOVASCULAR SCIENCES AND RESEARCH BENGALURU R/AT No.570, BAZAAR STREET, KENGERI, BENGALURU-560 060.3. SMT. SHOBHA.K.R., W/O RAMAPPA.K., AGED43YEARS, WORKING AS STAFF NURSE, JAYADEV INSTITUTE OF CARIOVASCULAR SCIENCES AND RESEARCH BENGALURU.-. 2 - NC:2024. KHC:40339 WP No.12683 of 2023 C/W WP No.12691 of 2023 R/AT No.9/A, PAPAIAH GARDEN9H CROSS, 4TH...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
- 1 - NC:2024. KHC:40339 WP No.12683 of 2023 R C/W WP No.12691 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE25H DAY OF SEPTEMBER2024BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA WRIT PETITION No.12683 OF2023C/W WRIT PETITION No.12691 OF2023(S-RES) IN W.P.No.12683/2023: BETWEEN:1. B.J.RANI, W/O RANGANATHA.C., AGED AOBUT42YEARS, WORKING AS STAFF NURSE, JAYADEV INSTITUTE OF CARDIOVASCULAR SCIENCES AND RESEARCH BENGALURU R/AT No.489/A, NISCHITA NILAYA, 2ND MAIN ROAD, NEAR17H CROSS, VISHWAPRIYA LAYOUT, BENGALURU SOUTH-560 068.2. SRI. AYUB KHAN.S.G., S/O GHOUSE KHAN, AGED39YEARS, WORKING AS STAFF NURSE, JAYADEV INSTITUTE OF CARIOVASCULAR SCIENCES AND RESEARCH BENGALURU R/AT No.570, BAZAAR STREET, KENGERI, BENGALURU-560 060.3. SMT. SHOBHA.K.R., W/O RAMAPPA.K., AGED43YEARS, WORKING AS STAFF NURSE, JAYADEV INSTITUTE OF CARIOVASCULAR SCIENCES AND RESEARCH BENGALURU.-. 2 - NC:2024. KHC:40339 WP No.12683 of 2023 C/W WP No.12691 of 2023 R/AT No.9/A, PAPAIAH GARDEN9H CROSS, 4TH...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE2024INSC730IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.10804 OF2024(Arising out of SLP (C) No.5843 of 2021) SHYAMSUNDAR RADHESHYAM AGRAWAL & ANR. ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS PUSHPABAI NILKANTH PATIL & ORS. ...RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT R.MAHADEVAN, J.Leave granted.2. This appeal is filed assailing the final order dated 03.03.2021 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay (hereinafter shortly referred to as "the High Court") in Writ Petition No.4695 of 2017, by which, the High Court has dismissed the said writ petition, thereby affirming the order dated 26.10.2016 passed by the Court of 4th Joint Civil Judge (Senior Division), Thane, (hereinafter shortly referred to as the trial Court) in allowing the application filed by the Defendant No.46 for impounding the six documents produced by the appellants herein. 23. Originally, the appellants instituted a suit in Special Civil Suit No.200 of 2008 seeking declaration and injunction. Denying the plaint...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE2024INSC727IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS. OF2024[Arising out of SLP(Crl.) Nos. 6250-6251 of 2024]. SUNIL @ SONU ETC. APPELLANT(S) VERSUS STATE NCT OF DELHI RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT B.R. GAVAI, J.1. Leave granted.2. The present appeals challenge the judgment and order dated 26th June 2023, passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi in Criminal Appeals No.408 and 137 of 2018, wherein the Division Bench dismissed the appeals filed by the appellants Sunil @ Sonu (Accused No.1) and Nitin @ Devender (Accused No.4). By the said judgment and order, the High Court upheld the judgment and order dated 25th October 2017 rendered by the Additional Sessions Judge, North District, Rohini, Delhi 1 (hereinafter referred to as the trial court) in Sessions Case No.139 of 2017 convicting the appellants for the offences punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
NON-REPORTABLE2024INSC729IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 8387 OF2013UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. .APPELLANT(S) VERSUS DOLY LOYI ...RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT Mehta, J.1. The instant appeal by special leave takes exception to the judgment dated 26th April, 2013 passed by the High Court of Delhi in Writ Petition(C) No.7960 of 2012 whereby the writ petition preferred by the appellant herein i.e., the Union of India was dismissed and the order passed by Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi(hereinafter being referred to as Tribunal) was upheld, whereby the Tribunal allowed Original 1 Application No.3716 of 2011 filed by the respondent herein challenging the denial of promotional benefits to him.2. The brief facts in a nutshell relevant and essential for the disposal of the instant appeal are noted hereinbelow.3. The respondent was appointed as Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax on 16th December, 1987. He was granted due promotio...
Tag this Judgment!