Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE2024INSC689IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.OF2024(Arising Out of Special Leave Petition (C) No.20580 of 2023) KIMNEO HAOKIP HANGSHING APPELLANT VERSUS KENN RAIKHAN & ORS. RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT SUDHANSHU DHULIA, J.Leave granted.2. The appellant before this Court is a Member of Legislative Assembly (hereinafter MLA) and was elected from the 46-Saikul Assembly Constituency in the 12th General Elections to the Manipur Legislative Assembly, which were held in 2022. 2 The respondent, who was also a contestant from the same seat, filed an Election Petition before the High Court of Manipur challenging the result of the election on the grounds that the appellant has not disclosed her assets in her nomination papers and that she had indulged in corrupt practices in the election. The appellant filed an application under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) read with Section 86 of the Representation of the People Act, 19...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE2024INSC687IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Appeal No.3816 / 2024 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No.11023 / 2024) Arvind Kejriwal .Appellant(s) versus Central Bureau of Investigation .Respondent(s) WITH Criminal Appeal No.3817 / 2024 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No.10991 / 2024) JUDGEMENT SURYA KANT, J.Leave granted.2. These appeals are directed against the judgements and orders dated 05.08.2024 passed by the High Court of Delhi (hereinafter, High Court), dismissing the Appellants challenge to his arrest being illegal as well as his application for the grant of regular bail. Consequently, the High Court upheld the legality of the Appellants arrest and has summarily declined to exercise its concurrent jurisdiction under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter, CrPC), thereby denying his prayer for regular bail. 1 | P age FACTS:3. At the very outset, it is essential to advert to the b...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
NON-REPORTABLE2024INSC694IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA EXTRA-ORDINARY APPELLATE JURISDICTION SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No.20243/2024 TALLURI SRIKAR (MINOR) THROUGH HIS FATHER TALLURI SRIKRISHNA PETITIONER VERSUS THE DIRECTOR, NATIONAL TESTING AGENCY & ORS. RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT MANOJ MISRA, J.1. By this Special Leave Petition, the petitioner seeks leave to appeal against the judgment and order of the High Court1 dated 09.08.2024, whereby the writ petition2 of the petitioner, inter alia, seeking a direction to the first respondent to conduct re-examination of NEET(UG)-2024 for the petitioner, as it did for 1563 candidates, has been dismissed. 1 The High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad 2 Writ Petition No.21897 of 2024 Special Leave Petition (C) No.20243/2024 Page 1 of 52. The case of the petitioner is that he suffers from a medical condition called Hyperhidrosis of palms and soles. Due to which, his palms sweat profusely. Therefore, to keep them dry, he needs a piece of c...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
NON-REPORTABLE2024INSC688IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.. OF2024(Arising out of SLP (C) No.24805 of 2023) RASHMI KANT VIJAY CHANDRA & ORS. APPELLANT(S) Versus BAIJNATH CHOUBEY & COMPANY RESPONDENT(S) ORDER Leave Granted.2. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 24th August, 2023 passed in S.A.No.100 of 2021 by the High Court of Calcutta, whereby the judgment and order dated 12th December, 2019 passed by the City Civil Court at Calcutta1 in Title Appeal No.14/2018 was set aside. The First Appellate Court set aside the findings returned by the Presidency Small 1 Hereinafter referred as First Appellate Court 1 | SLP (C) No . 2 4805/2023 Cause Court2 in favour of the respondent-tenant, at Calcutta in Ejectment Suit No.1079 of 2002 by order dated 27th November, 2017.3. The issue inter se the parties, is one between a landlord and tenant. The facts stretch about 90 years in time beginning on 19th February, 1933, when one Harak...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
- 1 - NC:2024. KHC-D:13123 WP No.108019 of 2023 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE13H DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH WRIT PETITION No.108019 OF2023(GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SRI. RAOJI S/O. DEVAJI PATEL, AGE:69. YEARS, OCC: NIL, R/O. H.NO.1, SIDDESHWAR NAGAR, UNKAL CROSS, HUBALLI, PIN-580031. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. ANAND R. KOLLI, ADVOCATE) AND:1. SMT. K.M. SAVITHRIDEVI, SINCE DEAD BY HER LRS. 1A. SHRI K.M. JAGADISH S/O. SAVITHRIDEVI, SINCE DECEASED, REPRESENTED BY HIS WIDOW SMT. SULOCHANA W/O. K.M. JAGADISH, AGE:64. YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O. DOOR NO.17, 2ND CROSS, 2ND MAIN, ANNAPURNESHWARI LAYOUT, J.P. NAGAR, 7TH PHASE, BENGALURU, PIN-560062. 1B. SHRI K.M. BASAVARAJ @ BHUVANESH S/O. SAVITHRIDEVI, AGE:64. YEARS, OCC: R/O. 571 , 6TH MAIN, 9TH CROSS, SADASHIVANAGAR, BENGALURU, PIN-560056. 1C. SMT. JAYASHREE D/O. SAVITHRIDEVI W/O. VIJAYKUMAR, SINCE DEAD BY HER LRS1C1) SHRI VIJAYAKUMAR S/O. GURUBASAYYA KASHIMATH, AGE:68. YEARS, O...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
- 1 - NC:2024. KHC-D:13121 WP No.77807 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE13H DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024 BEFORE R THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH WRIT PETITION No.77807 OF2013(GM-CPC) BETWEEN:1. M/S. SRI LAXMI BALAJI INDUSTRIES, A REGISTERED PARTNERSHIP FIRM, HAVING ITS OFFICE AT SURVEY NO.440/A/5, NAVALI ROAD, KARATAGI, KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED HEREIN BY ONE OF ITS PARTNERS , SRI. N. GOPALAKRISHNA.2. M/S. SRI LAXMI VINAYAKA, RICE INDUSTRIES, A REGISTERED PARTNERSHIP FIRM, HAVING ITS OFFICE AT SURVEY NO.440/A/5, NAVALI ROAD, KARATAGI, KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED HEREIN BY ONE OF ITS PARTNERS , SRI. N. GOPALAKRISHNA. ...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. S.R. KAMALACHARAN, ADVOCATE) AND: M/S. LAKSHMI VENKATESHWAR RICE INDUSTRIES, A PARTNERSHIP FIRM HAVING ITS OFFICE AT: SINDHANUR ROAD, SIRUGUPPA, BELLARY DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER SRI. S. DATTA SHABAREESH. RESPONDENT (BY SMT. V. VIDYA, ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF THE CONSTITUTION...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
1 R Reserved on :30. 08.2024 Pronounced on :13. 09.2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE13H DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION No.5030 OF2023BETWEEN:1. . SRI LINGESH K. S., S/O LATE SRI SOMASHEKARAPPA AGED ABOUT64YEARS EX-MEMBER OF LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY(MLA) AND CHAIRMAN COMMITTEE FOR REGULARIZATION OF UNAUTHORIZED OCCUPATION (BAGAIR HUKUM SAGUVALI SAMITHI) BELUR ASSEMBLY CONSTITUENCY(195) HASSAN DISTRICT 573 115. ALSO AT KARIKATTEHALLY VILLAGE CHATCHATNAHALLI HASSAN 573 121. 2 . SRI G.K.KUMAR S/O KENCHEGOWDA AGED ABOUT57YEARS MEMBER OF COMMITTEE FOR REGULARIZATION OF UNAUTHORIZED OCCUPATION (BAGAIR HUKUM SAGUVALI SAMITHI) BELUR TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT 573 115. ALSO AT HALEGENDEHALLY2HASSAN DISTRICT 573 115. 3 . SMT. SHAILA MOHAN W/O SRI MOHAN AGED ABOUT52YEARS MEMBER OF COMMITTEE FOR REGULARIZATION OF UNAUTHORIZED OCCUPATION (BAGAIR HUKUM SAGUVALI SAMITHI) BELUR TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT 573 115. ALSO AT KE...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
1 R Reserved on :07. 08.2024 Pronounced on :13. 09.2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE13H DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION No.7330 OF2024BETWEEN: DR. SHIVAMURTHY MURUGHA SHARANARU S/O LATE GURUMURTHY AGED ABOUT66YEARS PEETADHYAKSHARU, MURUGHA RAJENDRA BRUHANMUT CHITRADURGA KARNATAKA - 577 502 (IN JUDICIAL CUSTODY) PERMANENT R/O GUDABANULU VILLAGE CHITRADURGA DISTRICT. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI C.V.NAGESH, SR. ADVOCATE FOR SRI K.B.K.SWAMY, ADVOCATE) AND:1. . STATE OF KARNATAKA BY CHITRADURGA RURAL POLICE STATION CHITRADURGA - 577 502 REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR2HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BENGALURU - 560 001. 2 . CHANDRAKUMAR C., S/O CHAJJEGOWDA AGED ABOUT42YEARS LEGAL CUM PROBATION OFFICER DISTRICT CHILD PROTECTION UNIT NO.CA-15-17, ANJANADRI MAIN ROAD4H STAGE, 2ND BLOCK, VIJAYANAGARA MYSURU - 560 032. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI B.N.JAGADEESHA, ADDL. SPP) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION482...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE2024INSC682IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 258-259 OF2021PUNE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION APPELLANT(S) VERSUS SUS ROAD BANER VIKAS MANCH AND OTHERS RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 265-266 OF2021JUDGMENT B.R. GAVAI, J.1. These Civil Appeals challenge the judgment and order dated 27th October 2020 passed by the National Green Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi1 in Original Application2 No.210 of 20203 wherein the Tribunal disposed of the OA preferred by the Sus Road Baner Vikas Manch, 1 Hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal. 2 Hereinafter referred to as OA3Earlier OA No.34 of 2019 (WZ). Initially the OA was preferred before the Tribunal, Western Zone, and was subsequently transferred to the Principal Bench, New Delhi. 1 Respondent No.1 herein, by directing the Pune Municipal Corporation4 to close the Garbage Processing Plant5 operated by Noble Exchange Environment Solution Pune LLP6, at Baner, Pune and to shift the same to an alte...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
2024 INSC683REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.3083 OF2024JASEELA SHAJI APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA & ORS. RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT B.R. GAVAI, J.1. The appellant, who is the wife of one Appisseril Kochu Mohammed Shaji (Shaji A.K.)1, has approached this Court being aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 4th March 2024 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam in Writ Petition (Criminal) No.1271 of 20232, vide which it has dismissed the said habeas corpus petition filed by 1 Hereinafter referred to as detenu. 2 habeas corpus petition 1 the appellant for production of the detenu, who was detained pursuant to the order of detention dated 31st August 20233 passed under the provisions of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 19744.2. By order dated 31st of July 2024, this Court allowed the present appeal; quashed and set aside the impugned judgment and ...
Tag this Judgment!