Court : Jharkhand
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (C) No.7303 of 2011 --- Sushil Kumar Bariyar, son of Late Rachita Nand Prasad, permanent resident of Laheri Tola, Godda, P.O. & P.S. Godda, District Godda, presenty residing at Lane No.7, Netajee Nagar, Kanta Toli, P.O. Ranchi, P.S. Lower Bazar, District Ranchi .... ...... Petitioner Versus 1. Sanjeev Kumar, son of Shri Kameshwar Prasad, resident of Dayal Nagar, Piska More, Ratu Road, P.O. Hehal, P.S. Sukhdeo Nagar, District Ranchi . . Decree Holder/Opposite Party 2. Chittranjan Prasad Singh Kushwaha, son of Shri Bhagwan Prasad 3. Smt. Uma Kumari, wife of Shri Chittranjan Prasad Singh Kushwaha Sl. Nos.2 and 3, resident of Village Bedra Niwas, Tripathi Colony, P.O. & P.S. Doranda, District Ranchi, and permanent resident of Village Datri, P.O. & P.S. Senha, District Lohardaga 4. Smt. Kiran Ratna, wife of Shri Sanjay Ratna, resident of Tara Gupta Building, Road No.9, Indrapuri, P.O. Hehal, P.S. Sukhdeo Nagar, District Ranchi .... ..... Judgme...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
Cr. Revision No. 230 of 2006 --------- Against the judgment dated 24.02.2006 passed in Cr. Appeal No. 13/2005 by the learned VIII th Additional Sessions Judge, Palamau at Daltonganj, affirming the judgment dated 12.01.2005 passed in Complaint Case No. 32/2001 by the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Palamau at Daltonganj. --------- Santosh Kumar, S/o Late Ramchandra Prasad, R/o Village- Obra, P.S.- Obra, District- Sonbhadra (Uttar Pradesh) ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Jitendra S. Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shekhar Sinha, A.P.P. --------- Present: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY --------- By Court: Heard Mr. Jitendra S. Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Shekhar Sinha, learned A.P.P. for the State. Aggrieved by the judgment dated 24.02.2006 passed in Cr. Appeal No. 13/2005 by the learned VIIIth Additional Sessions Judge, Palamau at Daltonganj by which the judgment dated 12.0...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
AppealfromoriginalDecreeNo.89of1996(R) --- Against the judgment and decree dated 14.12.1995/21.12.1995passed by Sub- Judge, V, Ranchi in Money Suit No. 82 of 1987. 1.FoodCorporationofIndia 2.DistrictManager,FoodCorporationofIndia,Ranchi 3.SeniorRegionalManager,FoodCorporationof India,Patna ...Appellants Versus DeepakKumarSingh ........Respondent FortheAppellant :M/s.SatishBakshi,NipunBakshi &MrinalSingh,Advs. FortheRespondents :M/s.V.K.Prasad&Sahil,Advs. PRESENT HON'BLEMR.JUSTICEAPARESHKUMARSINGH --- ByCourt: Heardlearnedcounselfortheparties.2. AppellantswerethedefendantsinMoneySuitNo.82of1987 institutedbytheplaintiff/respondent,whohasalsopreferredcrossobjection beingaggrievedbythefindingsrenderedinthesameimpugnedjudgment. 3. Thecaseofthepartiesasborneoutfromthepleadingsbefore learnedcourt,interalia,areasunder: Plaintiff was appointed as Adhoc contractor for the period 197682 by the respondent/appellantF.C.I to undertake handling and transportation of consignment ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI Cr.M.P.No.189of2017 1.SiyaramMirdha 2.JalarMirdha 3.BadamiDevi .....Petitioners vs. 1.DhananjayKunwar 2.NirmalKunwar 3.GhutluKunwar 4.PremlalKunwar 5.BholaKunwar 6.VideoKunwar 7.LobinKunwar 8.PremlalMirdha 9.ManjuKunwar 10.AnitKunwar 11.ChandanKunwar 12.FullkumariDevi 13.ShantiDevi 14.SurjiDevi 15.SudmiyaDevi ...Oppositeparties CORAM:HONBLEMR.JUSTICEAPARESHKUMARSINGH HONBLEMR.JUSTICEB.B.MANGALMURTI ForthePetitioners :Ms.AmritaSinha,Adv. FortheOpp.Parties :M/s.NiveditaKundu SaibalMitra,Advs. 9/3.1.2018 Heardlearnedcounselfortheparties. Petitionershavesoughtleavetoappealagainstthejudgmentof acquittal dated 26th November, 2016 passed by learned Additional Sessions JudgeIV, Godda, whereby the accused persons/opposite partieshereinhavebeenacquittedofthechargesunderSections148, 341/149 & 307/149 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code in SessionsTrialNo.138/2011. The case of the parties as borne out from the F.I.R a...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
1 Criminal Appeal (D.B.) No. 656 of 2009 (Against the Judgment of conviction dated 27.05.2009 and Order of sentence dated 30.05.2009, passed by the Additional Sessions Judge-I, Dhanbad, in S.T. No. 23 of 1997.) 1. Shital Ram 2. Umesh Ram ..... Appellants Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Bhagwan Ram .. Respondents ------ For the Appellants : M/s Mahesh Tiwari & Pankaj Kr. Dubey, Advocates For the State : Mr. Manoj Kumar No. II, A.P.P. ------ PRESENT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ By Court.:- Heard learned counsel for the appellants and learned counsel for the State.2. The appellants are aggrieved by the Judgment of conviction dated 27.05.2009 and Order of sentence dated 30.05.2009, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Dhanbad, in S.T. No. 23 of 1997, whereby, both the appellants have been found guilty and convicted for the offences under Sections 302, 323 / 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Upon hearing on the point of senten...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
1 INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI W.P.(S)No.1019of2017 DhanmatiDeviandAnother Petitioners Versus CentralCoalfieldsLimitedthroughitsChairmancumManaging Director,RanchiandOthers ...Respondents CORAM:HON'BLEMR.JUSTICESHREECHANDRASHEKHAR ForthePetitioners :Mr.OmPrakashPrasad,Advocate FortheRespondents : Mr.RajeshLala,Advocate 07/03.01.2018 This writ petition was instituted on 17.02.2017 and it waslistedforhearingon20.03.2017,whenattheinstanceofthe learned counsel for the respondentM/s CCL it was adjourned for 09.05.2017. On 09.05.2017, in view of the assignment of the subjectcompassionateappointmentthewritpetitionwasdirectedto belistedbeforeappropriateBench.Onthenextdateofhearing,that is, on 19.06.2017 a prayer for adjournment for filing counteraffidavitwasmade.Orderdated14.11.2017readsasunder: Seeking appointment on compassionate ground, thepetitionershaveapproachedthisCourt. 2. Petitioner no. 1 is wife of the employee namely, Bod...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
CRIMINAL APPEAL (S.J.) No.197 of 2005 (Against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 28.01.2005 passed by Shri Rajesh Kumar Pandey, 5th Addl. Sessions Judge, FTC-II, Godda) ----- Anup Lal Sah Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand Respondent ----- For the Appellant : Mr. P.K.Jha, Advocate For the Respondent : A.P.P ----- PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT BIJAY SINGH ----- Anant Bijay Singh, J.The sole appellant had faced the trail in Sessions Case No.06/2004 before the court of 5th Addl. Sessions Judge, Godda who by judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 28.01.2005 had held him guilty u/s 304 part-11 of the IPC and sentenced him to undergo R.I for 5 years.2. It appears that this appeal was admitted for hearing on 06.04.2005 and the LCR was called for.3. It further appears that under order dated 19.05.2006 in I.A. No.849/2006 the appellant was released on bail.4. The case of the prosecution based upon the fardbeyan of the informant-PW-10, namely, Phakir S...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI F.A. No. 49 of 2017 .. Sanjiv Kumar Mahato --- ---- Appellant Versus Rekha Mahato ------ Respondent --- CORAM:The Honble Mr. Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ratnaker Bhengra ---- For the Appellant : Mr. R.C.P. Sah, Adv. For the Respondent : ---- 06/02.01.2018 Heard learned counsel for the appellant. Appellant is the husband aggrieved by the dismissal of Title Matrimonial Suit No.115/2013 instituted under Section 12(1)(c) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 wherein he alleged that consent of the petitioner for marriage was obtained by force. Case of the parties is briefly stated hereunder :- The appellant-husband solemnized marriage with the respondent on 23rd December 2012 at Gaurinath Dham, Purulia (West Bengal) and on 21 st January 2013 the marriage was registered before the Special Marriage Officer, Purulia (West Bengal). Thereafter they started living at Khutadih, Pindrajora, Bokaro at the house of the petitioner. Petitioner ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 423 of 2007 (Against the Judgment of conviction dated 09.03.2007 and Order of sentence dated 12.03.2007, passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C.-IV, Bokaro, in S.T No. 396 of 2005.) -------- Satrughan Rajwar @ Chhotu ... Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand ... Respondent -------- CORAM : THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. CHOUDHARY ------ For the Appellant : M/s. Arwind Kumar, Advocate N.K. Sahani, Advocate For the State : M/s. Satish Kumar Keshri, A.P.P ------ 06 / 02.01.2018. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and the learned counsel for the State.2. The appellant is aggrieved by the Judgment of conviction dated 09.03.2007 and Order of sentence dated 12.03.2007, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C.-IV, Bokaro, in S.T No. 396 of 2005, whereby, the sole appellant, who is the husband of the deceased, has been found guilty and convicted for the offence under Sec...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
Criminal Appeal No. 1240 of 2003 Against the judgment conviction and the order of sentence dated 13.08.2003 and 16.08.2003 respectively passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C.-II, Bokaro, in Sessions Trial No. 121 of 2002 (T.R. No. 01 of 2003) Raj Kumar Das .... Appellant Versus State of Jharkhand Respondent --- PRESENT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY --- For the Appellant : Mr. B. M. Tripathy, Sr. Advocate For the State : APP --- CAV On 19.05.2017 Delivered on 19.12 12.2017 Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J.1. Heard Mr. B. M. Tripathy, learned senior counsel for the appellant and learned A.P.P. for the State.2. This appeal is directed against the judgment of conviction and the order of sentence dated 13.08.2003 and 16.08.2003 respectively passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C.-II, Bokaro, in Sessions Trial No. 121 of 2002 (T.R. No. 01 of 2003), whereby and whereunder, the appellant has been convicted for the offence u/s 376 and 496 I.P.C. and sentenced to undergo...
Tag this Judgment!