Court : Jharkhand
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No. 1790 of 2016 Dr. Dular Hajam, Son of Late Joban Thakur, Resident of Village-Saharjam, P.O.-Karni, P.S.-Itkhori, District-Chatra .... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand, through its Secretary, Department of Human Resources Development, Govt. of Jharkhand, P.O.-Dhurwa, P.S.- Jagarnathpur, Ranchi.2. Vice-Chancellor, Vinoba Bhave University, P.O. & P.S.-Hazaribag, District Hazaribag.3. Registrar, Vinoba Bhave University, P.O. & P.S.-Hazaribag, District Hazaribag.4. Governing Body, Bhadrakali College, P.O. & P.S.-Itkhori, District-Chatra.5. Smt. Rekha Rani, Principal, K.B. Women's College, P.O. & P.S.-Hazaribag, District-Hazaribag.6. Dr. K. K. Sinha, Secretary, Bhadrakali College, P.O. & P.S.-Itkhori, District-Chatra. ... Respondents --- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMATH PATNAIK --- For the Petitioner : M/s. Rajiv Ranjan, Sr. Advocate Manoj Kumar & Piyush Chitresh, Advocates For the Respondent Nos.2&3 : Mrs. I. Sen Choudhary...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Arbitration Application No. 24 of 2017 .... MPD Industries Pvt. Ltd., Indore (Madhya Pradesh) Through its Authorised Signatory Debasis Bhattacharjee, Baghbazar, Kolkata. --- --- Petitioner Versus 1. Steel Authority of India Limited through its Chairman 2. Executive Director, SAIL Refractory Unit (SRU) Indira Gandhi Marg, District Bokaro. --- --- Respondents --- CORAM : The Honble Mr. Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Bibhash Sinha, Adv. For the Respondents : Mr. Vijay Kant Dubey, Adv. --- 11/05.01.2018 Pursuant to the orders passed by this Court on 15 th September 2017 and 8th December 2017, the proposed Arbitrator namely Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Jaya Roy (Retd.), Former Judge of this Court has submitted a declaration which is at Flag-Z being letter dated 3 rd January 2018. Learned counsel for the parties submit that the appointment of proposed Arbitrator can formally be made for adjudication of the dispute between the parties...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No. 1279 of 2011 ------- Ragini Shrivestva, wife of Amaresh Kumar, resident at Surya Nagar, Road No.1, Bijulia Talab Road, Ramgarh Cantt, P.O. Ramgarh, P.S. Ramgarh, District-Ramgarh. .... Petitioner Versus 1. The Jharkhand Academic Council, Ranchi at Gyandeep Campus Bargawan, Namkum, P.O.+P.S. Namkum, District Ranchi, through its Chairman.2. The Secretary, Jharkhand Academic Council, Ranchi at Gyandeep Campus Bargawan, Namkum, P.O.+P.S. Namkum, District Ranchi.3. The Managing Committee, Ramgarh Inter Women's College at Ramgarh Cantt. P.O.+P.S. Ramgarh, District Ramgarh through its President.4. The Sub-Divisional Officer-cum-Member of Managing Committee, Ramgarh Inter Women's College at Ramgarh P.O.+P.S. Ramgarh, District Ramgarh.5. The Education Officer-cum-Member of Managing Committee, Ramgarh Inter Women's College at Ramgarh P.O.+P.S. Ramgarh, District Ramgarh.6. Sri Arun Kumar Sinha, Member of Managing Committee, Ramgarh Inter Wom...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI M.A. No. 206 of 2017 Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd., Dhanbad. through the Manager. ..... Appellant Versus 1. Sundhia Devi 2. Vijay Rajak 3. Ajay Rajak 4. Preeti Kumari 5. Tusiya Devi 6. Manju Devi 7. Bulu Devi 8. Aarti Devi . Respondents CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA For the Appellant : Mr. Alok Lal, Advocate Mr. Santosh Kumar, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Saibal Kumar Laik, Advocate Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate Mr. Sushant Kumar, Advocate ----- 6/5.01.2018 Heard learned counsel for the appellant Insurance Company, learned counsel for the claimants respondents Nos. 1 to 7, and learned counsel for the respondent No.8, the owner of the offending truck.2. This appeal is directed against the impugned Award dated 3.10.2016, passed by the MACT, Dhanbad, in Title (M.V.) Claim case No.46 of 2014, arising out of a case of death due to accident by the offending truck, wherein the claimants respondents have been awarded the compensati...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND Criminal Appeal (D.B.) No.165 of 2006 ------ (Against the Judgment of conviction dated 13.12.2005 and Order of sentence dated 14.12.2005 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (F.T.C.), Latehar in Sessions Case No.135 of 2004.) ------ Sukhlal Singh son of Sri Darwari Singh Resident of village Ghatuwa police station- Latehar District- Latehar .... Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand .... Respondent ------ For the appellant : Mrs. J.Mazumdar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Awnish Shankar, Addl.P.P. ------ Present HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ JUDGMENT C.A.V ON0412.2017 PRONOUNCED ON0501/2018 Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.This criminal appeal is directed against the Judgment of conviction dated 13.12.2005 and order of sentence dated 14.12.2005 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (F.T.C.), Latehar in Sessions Case No.135 of 2004 whereby and where under the sole appellant has been found guilt...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (C) No.7286 of 2017 --- M/s Hindalco Industries Limited .... ...... Petitioner Versus State of Jharkhand and Ors. .... ..... Respondents --- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR --- For the Petitioner : Dr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Sr. Advocate Mr. Ashish Prasad, Advocate Mr. Amit Bhandari, Advocate Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Advocate Mr. Avishkar Singhvi, Advocate Ms. Mukta Dutta, Advocate Mr. V.K. Dubey, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Ajit Kumar, Advocate-General Mr. Himanshu Kr. Mehta, A.A.G. Mr. Atanu Banerjee, G.A-IV Mr. Sharad Kaushal, JC to A.A.G. Mr. Sameer Sahay, JC to A.G. --- Oral Order 04/04.01.2018 Notice.2. Mr. Sharad Kaushal, the learned State counsel appears and waives service of notice.3. Mr. H.K. Mehta, the learned Additional Advocate-General tenders a copy of a chart which would disclose payment made by some of the lessees, in purported compliance of demand letters issued by the competent authority of the Governmen...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Second Appeal No. 288 of 2015 1. M/s ISSCO Ltd. through its Chairman-cum-Managing Director, West Bengal.2. The Executive Director, M/s ISSCO, West Bengal.3. The General Manager, M/s ISSCO Chasnala Area, Dhanbad.4. The Chief Personal Manager, M/s ISSCO Chasnala Area, Dhanbad.5. The Additional General Manager, Jeetpur Colliery, M/s ISSCO, Chasnala, Dhanbad.6. The Senior Manager (P.L.), M/s ISSCO, Jeetpur Colliery, Dhanbad.7. The Personal Manager, M/s ISSCO, Jeetpur Colliery, Dhanbad. .. Appellants/Respondents/Defendants Versus Tulshi Choudhary, S/o Late Kishun Choudhary @ Krishna Choudhary. .. Respondent/Appellant/Plaintiff --------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT BIJAY SINGH --------- For the Appellants : Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Advocate. Mr. Kautav Panda, Advocate. For the Respondent : Mr. Mahesh Tewari, Advocate. : Mr. D.K. Maltiyar, Advocate. --------- JUDGMENT Reserved On:14. 12/2017 Pronounced On:04. 01/2018 1. The instant second appeal has ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Criminal Appeal (D.B.) No. 95 of 1993 (R) (Against the Judgment of conviction dated 11th of March, 1993 and Order of sentence dated 12th of March, 1993, passed by the 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, West Singhbhum at Chaibasa, in Sessions Trial No. 8 of 1990). ------------- Patel Katwar .. Appellant Versus The State of Bihar (Now Jharkhand) .. Respondent -------- For the Appellant : Mr. R.P. Gupta, Advocate. For the Respondent-State : Mr. Mukesh Kumar, A.P.P. -------- PRESENT : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------- By Court.:- Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the State.2. The appellant is aggrieved by the Judgment of conviction dated 11th of March, 1993 and Order of sentence dated 12th of March, 1993, passed by the learned 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, West Singhbhum at Chaibasa, in Sessions Trial No. 8 of 1990, whereby, the appellant has been found guilty and convict...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
-1- Cr. Appeal (DB) No.97 of 1993(R) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal (DB) No.97 of 1993(R) (Against the Judgment of conviction dated 20 th of May 1993 and Order of sentence dated 22nd of May 1993, passed by 6th Additional Judicial Commissioner, Ranchi, in S.T. No.19 of 1990) Boda Munda @ Sukhram Munda . Appellant Versus The State of Bihar (Now Jharkhand) .. Respondent PRESENT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY .. For the Appellant : Mr. J.P. Agrawal, Advocate Mr. Ajay Kr. Pathak, Advocate For the State : Ms. Vandana Bharti, APP .. By Court.:- Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the State.2. Appellant is aggrieved by the Judgment of conviction dated 20.5.1993 and Order of sentence dated 22.05.1993, (dates wrongly mentioned in the impugned Judgment as 20.6.1993 and 22.6.1993 respectively), passed by the learned 6th Additional Judicial Commissioner, Ranchi, in S.T. No.19 of 1990, whereby, the sole appellan...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 4506 of 2015 Dilip Kumar Choudhary .. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through the Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi 2. The Commissioner, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi 3. The Commissioner, North Chhotanagpur Division, Hazaribagh 4. The Dy. Commissioner, Chatra 5. The Anchal Adhikari, Simaria, Chatra ... .. Respondents ------ CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DR. S. N. PATHAK ----- For Petitioner : Mr. Vijoy Pratap Singh, Sr. Advocate Mrs. Rashmi Kumar, Advocate Miss Ragini Kumari, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. D.K.Dubey, Sr SC-I ------ 05/ 04.01.2018 The petitioner has approached this Court with a prayer for a direction upon the respondents to give the benefits of time bond promotion under earlier pay revision and benefits of ACP / MACP under VI Pay Revision. Further prayer has been made to recalculate the pension and other retiral due...
Tag this Judgment!