Singularity - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: singularity Year: 2010 Page 1 of about 58 results (0.002 seconds)Brakes India Ltd. Represented by Power Agent/Subrogee, United India In ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-26-2010
..... the learned counsel for the plaintiffs would have found favour with me peculiarly as a singularly singular case in this matter the plaintiffs do very much rely on ex p14 their own ..... circumstances of this case as such i would like to describe this case as a singularly singular case relating to which strict liability theory cannot be applied 45 but here the plaintiffs .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPrime Industries Ltd. Vs. Seil Ltd. and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-21-2010
..... arbitrator and while interpreting an act or regulation a term in singular would include plural and vive versa in view of section 13 ..... and ors 2005 12 scc 290 that a term expressed in singular would include plural and vice versa by applying section 13 2 ..... procedure for appointment of arbitrator there is no question of the singular including plural here as the intent of the parties is clear .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRamesh Pandey. Vs. M/S Chenab Textiles Mills.
Court: Jammu and Kashmir
Decided on: Nov-15-2010
..... witness this argument is fallacious general clauses act 1977 provides that the words used in singular could be read and include in plural and vice versa section 13 thereof is reproduced ..... importing the masculine gender shall be taken to include females and 2 words in the singular shall include the plural and vice versa thus the word witnesses include witness also therefore .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTC.Velu @ Venkatesalam, and ors. Vs. S.Kandasamy Chettiar(Died), and or ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-15-2010
..... decretal amount from the mortgagors which would be grossly oppressive 22 here this is a singularly singular case in which the learned judge simply on finding that no counter was filed on .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJagat Pal Vs. State of U.P. and Others
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Sep-24-2010
..... son and daughter whereas with respect to sub rule 2 c iv it is in singular form by mentioning brother and sister and not brothers and sisters 29 the problem which ..... has attached plurality with the word son and daughter as sons and daughters and why singularity is attached with the word brother and sister in rule 2 c iv whereas either .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTA.Saravanan ... Vs. M.V.Nalllaiya Asari ....
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-12-2010
1 animadverting upon the order dated 22 11 2007 passed by the appellate authority principal sub judge salem in r...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S.United India Insurance Co.Ltd. Vs. T.Apparanantham, and anr.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-14-2010
..... be set aside and that should be respected in stricto sensu but this is a singularly singular case as set out supra and therefore i set aside the order dated 01 02 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSumitomo Chemical India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-26-2010
..... year during the last three years prior to the date of bid opening cannot be singularly treated as a condition precedent as the language employed in clause 7 2 b and ..... while dealing with the tender document as the tender document is basically and fundamentally a singular document 46 the present factual matrix has to be tested on the touchstone of the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSmt. Saroj Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-28-2010
..... light 28 not only it is not possible for a lady to singularly or for an average man to singularly lift a dead body on the head and cart it around for .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIn Re: Europlast India Ltd. a Company Incorporated Under Companies Act ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jan-07-2010
..... proceedings or the order of the court as that argument will be advanced in every singular case of this kind the fact asserted that the transfer was in good faith and ..... the scene namely the interests of the directors of the two companies were overlapping they singularly and together transferred the property in favour of the k company for consideration even though .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial