Singularity - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: singularity Year: 1996 Page 1 of about 85 results (0.004 seconds)Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Delhi Bidi Sales Agencies
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-22-1996
Reported in: [1997]225ITR54(MP)
..... unequivocal categorical and unambiguous and does not permit any other kind of construction but a singular one section 50 4 proviso as inserted by act of 2004 dipak misra krishn kumar .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Jila Sahakari Kendriya Bank Maryadit
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-13-1996
Reported in: (1997)142CTR(MP)58; [1997]225ITR421(MP)
..... unequivocal categorical and unambiguous and does not permit any other kind of construction but a singular one section 50 4 proviso as inserted by act of 2004 dipak misra krishn kumar .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Smt. Bilkishbai
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-22-1996
Reported in: [1997]225ITR570(MP)
..... unequivocal categorical and unambiguous and does not permit any other kind of construction but a singular one section 50 4 proviso as inserted by act of 2004 dipak misra krishn kumar .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSanctus Drugs Pharmaceuticals Private Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-25-1996
Reported in: [1997]225ITR252(MP)
..... unequivocal categorical and unambiguous and does not permit any other kind of construction but a singular one section 50 4 proviso as inserted by act of 2004 dipak misra krishn kumar .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPooranchand Patel Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-22-1996
Reported in: [1997]225ITR176(MP)
..... unequivocal categorical and unambiguous and does not permit any other kind of construction but a singular one section 50 4 proviso as inserted by act of 2004 dipak misra krishn kumar .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Shelly Products and Mukesh Kumar Agrawa ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-09-1996
Reported in: [1997]225ITR882(MP)
..... unequivocal categorical and unambiguous and does not permit any other kind of construction but a singular one section 50 4 proviso as inserted by act of 2004 dipak misra krishn kumar .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Mohanlal Radhakrishna
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: May-11-1996
Reported in: [1997]225ITR867(MP)
..... unequivocal categorical and unambiguous and does not permit any other kind of construction but a singular one section 50 4 proviso as inserted by act of 2004 dipak misra krishn kumar .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Thakurdas Aidasani
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-02-1996
Reported in: [1997]226ITR869(MP)
..... unequivocal categorical and unambiguous and does not permit any other kind of construction but a singular one section 50 4 proviso as inserted by act of 2004 dipak misra krishn kumar .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Bhilai Mahila Samaj
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-22-1996
Reported in: [1997]225ITR173(MP)
..... unequivocal categorical and unambiguous and does not permit any other kind of construction but a singular one section 50 4 proviso as inserted by act of 2004 dipak misra krishn kumar .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKeshrimal Bapulal (Huf) and ors. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-31-1996
Reported in: [1997]225ITR427(MP)
..... unequivocal categorical and unambiguous and does not permit any other kind of construction but a singular one section 50 4 proviso as inserted by act of 2004 dipak misra krishn kumar .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial