Singularity - Year 1952 - Judgments

Feb 28 1952 (HC)

Amarendra Nath Vs. Bibhuti Bhuson

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Feb-28-1952

Reported in: AIR1952Cal773

..... a term but from the that the word condition is used in the singular and not plural which makes it ambiguous in the sense as to which ..... plaint in pleading it is quite true that the words said condition in singular are used but apart from the fact that the word condition is ..... used in the singular and not plural which makes it ambiguous in the sense as to .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 22 1952 (HC)

Walchandnagar Industries Ltd. Vs. Ratanchand Khimchand Motishaw

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Sep-22-1952

Reported in: AIR1953Bom285; (1953)55BOMLR236; ILR1953Bom623

..... the fact that the legislature has used the plural and not the singular the legislature has prohibited the entering into of any contracts and ..... the plural in this context the plural would undoubtedly include the singular and the prohibition is with regard to the entering into of ..... to be that the plural was used in contrast to the singular which is used in the proviso which follows and which proviso .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 23 1952 (HC)

Poshaki and anr. Vs. State

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Oct-23-1952

Reported in: AIR1953All526

..... construed strictly the use of the word a person in singular in section 27 is somewhat significant the word was used in singular designedly because the joint statement of a number of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 28 1952 (HC)

Mohammad Matteen Qidwai Vs. the Governor-general in Council

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Apr-28-1952

Reported in: AIR1953All17

..... to be noticed that in this second clause the word service is used in the singular and not in the plural had it been the intention t restrict the second clause ..... have signified regularly constituted services having a cadre of their own the word service in singular is not meant to refer to such regularly constituted service but to the fact that .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 02 1952 (HC)

Bishan Chand Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, U.P., Lucknow

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Sep-02-1952

Reported in: AIR1953All165; [1952]22ITR520(All)

..... the other sub sections of the same section the word person has been used in singular the argument is that the word person in this sub section must be deemed to .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 12 1952 (SC)

Aswini Kumar Ghose and anr. Vs. Arabinda Bose and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Dec-12-1952

Reported in: AIR1953SC75; (1953)55BOMLR278; (1953)IMLJ211(SC)

..... published under the heading a disturbing decision the burden of it was that in a singularly oblique and infelicitous manner the supreme court had by a majority decision tolled the knell .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 07 1952 (HC)

Commissioner of Agricultural Income-tax, West Bengal Vs. Molla Md. Abd ...

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: May-07-1952

Reported in: [1952]22ITR214(Cal)

..... of the tribunal where the final findings of fact ought really to occur is a singularly bald document containing but a bare reference to these sixty acres of land the question .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 26 1952 (HC)

In the Goods of Kumar Brojendra Narayan Singh Deo Deceased

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Jun-26-1952

Reported in: AIR1953Cal606

..... and functioning but who was not present to sign additional bond or additional affidavit that singular fact fundamentally distinguishes the present case before me here there is no administrator yet because .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 25 1952 (HC)

Thota Ramakrishnayya and ors. Vs. the State

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Nov-25-1952

Reported in: AIR1954Mad442; (1953)IIMLJ425

..... of partisanship if they charged one side only have charged both the cases with the singular result that in regard to the same rioting at the same place and at the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 24 1952 (HC)

Hazari Lal Bhanna Mal Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and ors.

Court: Himachal Pradesh

Decided on: Nov-24-1952

Reported in: AIR1953HP41

..... secretary of agriculture v central roig refining co 1950 94 law ed 381 as a singular intrusion of the judiciary into the legislative process 22 the next point relates to the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Singularity - Judgment Search Results