Skip to content


Singularity - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: singularity Year: 1983 Page 1 of about 41 results (0.007 seconds)
Sep 23 1983 (SC)

Gulam Abbas and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Sep-23-1983

Reported in: AIR1983SC1268; 1983(31)BLJR593; 1983(2)SCALE704; (1984)1SCC81; [1984]1SCR64

..... social security is not the only goal of a good society our country is taking singular pride in the democratic ideals enshrined in its constitution and the most cherished of these .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 01 1983 (HC)

Dwarka Prasad Agarwal Vs. Samrath Singh and ors.

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Decided on: Jul-01-1983

Reported in: II(1984)ACC31

..... unequivocal categorical and unambiguous and does not permit any other kind of construction but a singular one section 50 4 proviso as inserted by act of 2004 dipak misra krishn kumar .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 16 1983 (HC)

Renu Soni and ors. Vs. Narayan Singh and ors.

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Decided on: Dec-16-1983

Reported in: 1(1984)ACC451

..... unequivocal categorical and unambiguous and does not permit any other kind of construction but a singular one section 50 4 proviso as inserted by act of 2004 dipak misra krishn kumar .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 24 1983 (HC)

Sheeladevi Matlani Vs. Commissioner For Workman's Compensation and Ors ...

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Decided on: Oct-24-1983

Reported in: II(1984)ACC348

..... unequivocal categorical and unambiguous and does not permit any other kind of construction but a singular one section 50 4 proviso as inserted by act of 2004 dipak misra krishn kumar .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 29 1983 (HC)

Komal Das Baghel Vs. Maqsood Khan @ Pappu Seth and anr.

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Decided on: Jul-29-1983

Reported in: 1(1985)ACC46

..... unequivocal categorical and unambiguous and does not permit any other kind of construction but a singular one section 50 4 proviso as inserted by act of 2004 dipak misra krishn kumar .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 06 1983 (HC)

Mariam Bee Vs. Town and Country Development Authority

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Decided on: May-06-1983

Reported in: 1(1984)ACC227

..... unequivocal categorical and unambiguous and does not permit any other kind of construction but a singular one section 50 4 proviso as inserted by act of 2004 dipak misra krishn kumar .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 19 1983 (HC)

State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Bhama Devi and ors.

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Decided on: Sep-19-1983

Reported in: 1(1984)ACC245

..... unequivocal categorical and unambiguous and does not permit any other kind of construction but a singular one section 50 4 proviso as inserted by act of 2004 dipak misra krishn kumar .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 27 1983 (HC)

Panna Lal JaIn Vs. Memo Devi

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-27-1983

Reported in: 24(1983)DLT66

..... 13 of the general clauses act 1897 in all central acts and regulations words in singular shall include the plural and vice versa it can thereforee be urged that the word ..... word premises used in the main part of section 14a 1 would be interpreted in singular i e only one premises and not number of premises separately let out the legislature .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 22 1983 (HC)

Gandhi Company Vs. Krishna Glass Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Mar-22-1983

Reported in: (1983)85BOMLR179; 1983MhLJ1036

..... of the plural persons is obviously deliberate since while a singular may also mean the plural the plural can never mean singular when a suit is instituted in the name of a .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 13 1983 (TRI)

United Electrical Industries Vs. Collector of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: May-13-1983

Reported in: (1983)LC819DTri(Delhi)

..... could perform all the functions enumerated in the entry hence entry 58 as worded in singular i e as machine instead of as machines was a slip up and the same ..... and regulations unless there is anything repugnant in the subject or context words in the singular shall include the plural and vice versa in the light of these authorities and provision .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //