Singularity - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: singularity Year: 2003 Page 1 of about 126 results (0.006 seconds)M.P. State Electricity Board and anr. Vs. Smt. Kamla Sharma and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-16-2003
Reported in: AIR2004MP57; 2003(3)MPHT434; 2003(4)MPLJ233
..... unequivocal categorical and unambiguous and does not permit any other kind of construction but a singular one section 50 4 proviso as inserted by act of 2004 dipak misra krishn kumar .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income Tax Vs. Kumars Tyre Manufacturing Co.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: May-09-2003
Reported in: (2003)183CTR(MP)590; [2004]266ITR325(MP); 2003(4)MPHT359
..... unequivocal categorical and unambiguous and does not permit any other kind of construction but a singular one section 50 4 proviso as inserted by act of 2004 dipak misra krishn kumar .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKrishi Upaj Mandi Samiti Vs. Mahesh Bhati and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-09-2003
Reported in: 2003(3)MPHT464
..... unequivocal categorical and unambiguous and does not permit any other kind of construction but a singular one section 50 4 proviso as inserted by act of 2004 dipak misra krishn kumar .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSmt. Rukayya Bai Vs. Smt. Munni Bai and anr.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-09-2003
Reported in: 2003(3)MPHT422; 2004(2)MPLJ92
..... unequivocal categorical and unambiguous and does not permit any other kind of construction but a singular one section 50 4 proviso as inserted by act of 2004 dipak misra krishn kumar .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTVijay Singh Chauhan Vs. State of M.P. and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-17-2003
Reported in: 2003(3)MPHT438
..... unequivocal categorical and unambiguous and does not permit any other kind of construction but a singular one section 50 4 proviso as inserted by act of 2004 dipak misra krishn kumar .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSubhadra Vs. Rajendra Prasad
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-23-2003
Reported in: 2003(3)MPHT452
..... unequivocal categorical and unambiguous and does not permit any other kind of construction but a singular one section 50 4 proviso as inserted by act of 2004 dipak misra krishn kumar .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRandheer Singh Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-24-2003
Reported in: 2003(3)MPHT432; 2003(4)MPLJ321
..... unequivocal categorical and unambiguous and does not permit any other kind of construction but a singular one section 50 4 proviso as inserted by act of 2004 dipak misra krishn kumar .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDodsal Limited Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-28-2003
Reported in: 2003(3)MPHT446; 2003(4)MPLJ236
..... unequivocal categorical and unambiguous and does not permit any other kind of construction but a singular one section 50 4 proviso as inserted by act of 2004 dipak misra krishn kumar .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJhabbu and ors. Vs. State of M.P.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-29-2003
Reported in: 2003(3)MPHT426
..... unequivocal categorical and unambiguous and does not permit any other kind of construction but a singular one section 50 4 proviso as inserted by act of 2004 dipak misra krishn kumar .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRaghuveer Charan Sharma Vs. Aditya Narayan Kapoor
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-25-2003
Reported in: 2003(3)MPHT456; 2003(4)MPLJ112
..... unequivocal categorical and unambiguous and does not permit any other kind of construction but a singular one section 50 4 proviso as inserted by act of 2004 dipak misra krishn kumar .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial