Singularity - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: singularity Year: 1964 Page 1 of about 19 results (0.007 seconds)ShyamnaraIn Sharma Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Oct-09-1964
Reported in: AIR1965Raj87
d s dave c j 1 this is a writ application under article 226 of the constitution of india by...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnited States Vs. Barnett
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-06-1964
..... i that this court would exercise the jurisdictions and powers hereby granted concerning all and singular the premises according to law as fully and amply to all intents and purposes whatsoever ..... justice to all persons and exercise the jurisdictions and powers hereby granted concerning all and singular the premises according to law as fully and amply to all intents and purposes whatsoever .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHunter Vs. Fox
Court: House of Lords
Decided on: Apr-08-1964
..... evidence of intention even if it were more than conjectural 8230 in deciding whether a singular successor is effectually restricted in the use of his property it is not the intention ..... at p 90 no doubt the intention of the conveyancer was clear enough but the singular successor who is entitled to trust to the records has nothing to do with intention .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSimpson Vs. Union Oil Co. of California
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-20-1964
..... is not involved in this case the patent cases cited by the court are also singularly irrelevant to the issue here footnote 2 3 there is no reason to suppose that .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTVeerappa Shiddalingappa Virupathi and ors. Vs. State of Mysore and ors ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-13-1964
Reported in: AIR1965Kant227; AIR1965Mys227; (1964)2MysLJ211
..... read as including the plural the lists according to the general clauses act words importing singular can be read as importing the plural also only if the context does not indicate .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBank of Commerce Ltd. (In Liquidation) Vs. Arun Kumar Chowdhury and or ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jun-01-1964
Reported in: AIR1965Cal333,68CWN858
..... pursuant to a direction contained in a decree of this court the order shows a singular lack of that cautious approach which this court should have expected to the application the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTA. Lakshmanan, Madras Vs. the Commissioner of Income-tax, Madras
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-03-1964
Reported in: AIR1965Mad381; [1964]53ITR780(Mad)
..... 3 even on the statement of the facts it seems to us that there is singularly little substance in the case of the department that there had been no effective capitalisation .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTA. Lakshmanan Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Madras.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-01-1964
Reported in: [1964]53ITR777(Mad)
..... course even on the statement of the facts it seems to us that there is singularly little substance in the case of the department that there had been no effective capitalisation .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTFirst Additional Income-tax Officer, Kozhikode Vs. Susheela Sadanandan ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Oct-29-1964
Reported in: [1965]57ITR168(SC)
..... section 13 2 of the general clauses act central act x of 1897 words in singular will include their plural also the expression legal representative in section 24b of the act .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSeth Banarsi Das Etc. Vs. Wealth Tax Officer, Special Circle Meerut, E ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Dec-08-1964
Reported in: AIR1965SC1387; [1965]56ITR224(SC); [1965]2SCR355
..... 13 2 of the general clause act 1897 no 10 of 1897 words in the singular shall include the plural and vice versa 9 the basic assumption on which the appellants .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial