Singularity - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: singularity Year: 1982 Page 1 of about 54 results (0.005 seconds)Rajaram Gupta and ors. Vs. Dharamchand and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-29-1982
Reported in: 1983CriLJ612
..... unequivocal categorical and unambiguous and does not permit any other kind of construction but a singular one section 50 4 proviso as inserted by act of 2004 dipak misra krishn kumar .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTVikram Tamaskar and ors. Vs. Steel Authority of India Ltd. and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-05-1982
Reported in: (1982)IILLJ84MP
..... unequivocal categorical and unambiguous and does not permit any other kind of construction but a singular one section 50 4 proviso as inserted by act of 2004 dipak misra krishn kumar .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income Tax Vs. Birbal Khanna and Co.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-25-1982
Reported in: (1983)33CTR(MP)240
..... unequivocal categorical and unambiguous and does not permit any other kind of construction but a singular one section 50 4 proviso as inserted by act of 2004 dipak misra krishn kumar .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax, M.P. -ii Vs. R. S. Banwarilal.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-08-1982
Reported in: (1983)28CTR(MP)59; [1983]140ITR3(MP)
..... unequivocal categorical and unambiguous and does not permit any other kind of construction but a singular one section 50 4 proviso as inserted by act of 2004 dipak misra krishn kumar .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax M. P. Vs. Badri Prasad Agarwal.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-21-1982
Reported in: (1983)29CTR(MP)341; [1983]142ITR353(MP)
..... unequivocal categorical and unambiguous and does not permit any other kind of construction but a singular one section 50 4 proviso as inserted by act of 2004 dipak misra krishn kumar .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState Bank of India Officers' Association and Ors. Vs. State Bank of I ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-03-1982
Reported in: (1982)IILLJ363MP
..... unequivocal categorical and unambiguous and does not permit any other kind of construction but a singular one section 50 4 proviso as inserted by act of 2004 dipak misra krishn kumar .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUmashanker and ors. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-25-1982
Reported in: 1982CriLJ1186
..... unequivocal categorical and unambiguous and does not permit any other kind of construction but a singular one section 50 4 proviso as inserted by act of 2004 dipak misra krishn kumar .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSantosh Kumar Mishra Vs. State of M.P. and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-30-1982
Reported in: 1983CriLJ1378
..... unequivocal categorical and unambiguous and does not permit any other kind of construction but a singular one section 50 4 proviso as inserted by act of 2004 dipak misra krishn kumar .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Wealth Tax Vs. Nandkishore Badrilal.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-05-1982
Reported in: (1983)35CTR(MP)42
..... unequivocal categorical and unambiguous and does not permit any other kind of construction but a singular one section 50 4 proviso as inserted by act of 2004 dipak misra krishn kumar .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBhagwat Saran and ors. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Dec-06-1982
Reported in: 1982(2)SCALE1376; (1983)1SCC389
..... social security is not the only goal of a good society our country is taking singular pride in the democratic ideals enshrined in its constitution and the most cherished of these .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial