Skip to content


Singularity - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: singularity Year: 1968 Page 1 of about 20 results (0.006 seconds)
Mar 13 1968 (HC)

Chipping and Painting Employers, Association Private Limited Vs. A.T. ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Mar-13-1968

Reported in: AIR1969Bom274; (1968)70BOMLR506; [1968(17)FLR324]; ILR1969Bom783

..... the words any question refer the question and such proceeding in the singular indicated that in respect of each such question arising as to ..... as we have held above the use of these expressions in the singular is not inconsistent with that view mr nariman further argued that ..... to the act and the use of the expression in the singular is not inconsistent with that view mr nariman further argued that .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 13 1968 (HC)

Chipping and Painting Employees' Association Ltd. Vs. Zambre (A.T.) an ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Mar-13-1968

Reported in: (1968)IILLJ193Bom

..... the use of the words any question refer the question and such proceeding in the singular indicated that in respect of each such question arising as to the application or interpretation ..... to s 13a as we have held above the use of these expressions in the singular is not inconsistent with the view sri nariman further argued that in the same area .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 11 1968 (HC)

Maharaja Dharmendra Prasad Singh and anr. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh a ...

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Oct-11-1968

Reported in: AIR1969All484

..... relied on the provisions of sub section 2 of section 13 general clauses act that singular includes plural that might however cover a case where more than one judge have been ..... he can constitute another judge or judges to hear the reference in that case the singular includes the plural and we are unable to accept the contention that because the words .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 13 1968 (HC)

Calcutta National Bank Ltd. (In Liquidation) Vs. Rangaroon Tea Co. Ltd ...

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Jun-13-1968

Reported in: AIR1969Cal578

..... also submitted on the basis of the travancore cochin case that the expression issue is singularly inapt in relation to mortgage a mortgage is created or executed not issued a company .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 13 1968 (SC)

The State of Kerala Vs. Haji K. Haji K. Kutty Naha and ors. Etc.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Aug-13-1968

Reported in: AIR1969SC378; [1969]1SCR645

..... are not liable to pay tax 3 the act on a bare perusal discloses some singular provisions the liability to tax in respect of buildings having total floor area between 1000 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 04 1968 (HC)

Parekh Brothers Vs. Kartick Chandra Saha and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Mar-04-1968

Reported in: AIR1968Cal532

..... correspondence he refers only to kartick chandra saha and uses the word client in the singular number if there had been three landlords and if kartick chandra saha had been negotiating .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 09 1968 (HC)

Basanta Pandey and anr. Vs. Sudhir Lall Seal and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Aug-09-1968

Reported in: AIR1969Cal360,74CWN109

..... circumstances is to sue all members of the family first and last this is a singularly unfit matter for interference under article 227 of the constitution 11 in the result the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 06 1968 (HC)

Kamakshi Ammal Vs. Hav. Maj. S. Rajaraman and anr.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Dec-06-1968

Reported in: (1969)1MLJ454

m anantanarayanan c j 1 this is a singularly disquieting case because of the delays of the judicial process revealed in the protracted history .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 29 1968 (HC)

Pamela Williams Vs. Patrick Cyril Martin

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Oct-29-1968

Reported in: AIR1970Mad92

..... appointed will have no authority in france and can do nothing here the case is singular for these reasons but it does not follow that the order ought not to be .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 25 1968 (HC)

Municipal Council, Ajmer and anr. Vs. Sadulla and anr.

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: Apr-25-1968

Reported in: AIR1969Raj39; 1969CriLJ308

..... 20 contains any such prohibition because under section 13 2 of the general clauses act singular will include plural and as such the municipal council should authorise more than one person .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //