Skip to content


Singularity - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: singularity Year: 1959 Page 1 of about 30 results (0.003 seconds)
Jan 15 1959 (HC)

Bakhshish Singh Dhaliwal Vs. the State

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Jan-15-1959

Reported in: AIR1959P& H448; 1959CriLJ1106

..... case of one accused person but more than one charge if the singular were to include the plural in sections 233 to 238 there would ..... in the previous six sections the word person is used in the singular number it is contended that clause b of section 239 read with ..... doubt as provided for by the general clauses act words in the singular shall include the plural and vice versa but this is only where .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 28 1959 (SC)

K. Satwant Singh Vs. the State of Punjab

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Oct-28-1959

Reported in: AIR1960SC266; [1960]2SCR89

..... s 13 of the general clauses act central act x of 1897 words in the singular shall include the plural and vice versa under clause b therefore persons accused of several ..... offence having regard to the provisions of s 13 of the general clauses act the singular includes the plural and it would not be straining the language of the clause if .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 12 1959 (HC)

Superintending Engineer and ors. Vs. Workmen of Machkund Hydro Electri ...

Court: Orissa

Decided on: Nov-12-1959

Reported in: AIR1960Ori205

..... by more than one state it was contended that under the general clauses act the singular should mean plural so that the state government in the definition of the appropriate government ..... is true that by virtue of section 13 2 of the general clauses act the singular may also include the plural unless there is something repugnant in the subject or context .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 16 1959 (SC)

Waman Shriniwas Kini Vs. Ratilal Bhagwandas and Co.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Feb-16-1959

Reported in: AIR1959SC689; (1959)61BOMLR1011; [1959]Supp(2)SCR217

..... the plural and of the respondent that it should be in the singular but whether it is in the singular or plural it does not make any difference to the principal argument .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 07 1959 (HC)

The Commissioner for Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Vs. A.P ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Aug-07-1959

Reported in: (1960)1MLJ157

..... clause 35 of the madras general clauses act which states that words used in the singular shall include the plural section 84 1 invests a jurisdiction in the board to decide .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 16 1959 (FN)

British Oxygen Co. Vs. South of Scotland Electricity Board. British Ox ...

Court: House of Lords

Decided on: Apr-16-1959

..... between two rates but i do not agree with his submission that the court is singularly ill fitted to deal with the question on the contrary i see no reason when .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 20 1959 (HC)

Sonar Bangla Bank Ltd. Vs. Calcutta Engineering College and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: May-20-1959

Reported in: AIR1960Cal409

..... matter except to state on this issue the facts i have just mentioned and the singular fact that the defendant college was admittedly taken over by the government but the college .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 17 1959 (HC)

Surendra Nath Bibra Vs. Stephen Court Ltd.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Aug-17-1959

Reported in: AIR1960Cal346,63CWN923

..... instead of allowing it in part on a reduced rate of rent on apportionment the singular defence of suspension of rent taken by the defendant lessee petitioner failed thereafter there was .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 18 1959 (HC)

Sorabji Hormusha Joshi and Co. Vs. V.M. Ismail and anr.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Nov-18-1959

Reported in: AIR1960Mad520

..... m s kothawal mohamad obaidulla sahib and sons tanners vaniyambadi who seems to have been singularly unfitted for doing this survey it is enough to extract the following admissions in his .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 07 1959 (HC)

Tulsidas Mulji and anr. Vs. Ebrahimjee and ors.

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Aug-07-1959

Reported in: AIR1960Ker75

..... scope of thet rule and order 30 r 10 uses the words any person the singular number is there but the word person must be given the meaning assigned to it .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //