Singularity - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: singularity Year: 1998 Page 1 of about 55 results (0.006 seconds)Uttam Singh Duggal and Co. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-1998
Reported in: 72(1998)DLT798
c m nayar j 1 this judgment will dispose of the objections filed by the respondent union of india under...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLaxmi Devi Shrivastava Vs. Anil Kumar Zutsi and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-29-1998
Reported in: 1999(1)MPLJ82
..... unequivocal categorical and unambiguous and does not permit any other kind of construction but a singular one section 50 4 proviso as inserted by act of 2004 dipak misra krishn kumar .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNew India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Smt. Jassibai Wd/O Dashrath and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-20-1998
Reported in: 2001ACJ699; 1999(1)MPLJ192
..... unequivocal categorical and unambiguous and does not permit any other kind of construction but a singular one section 50 4 proviso as inserted by act of 2004 dipak misra krishn kumar .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAmar Bahadur Khadak Bahadur Vs. State of M.P.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-15-1998
Reported in: 1999(1)MPLJ67
..... unequivocal categorical and unambiguous and does not permit any other kind of construction but a singular one section 50 4 proviso as inserted by act of 2004 dipak misra krishn kumar .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of M.P. and anr. Vs. Santosh Kumar Agrawal and anr.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-08-1998
Reported in: 1999(1)MPLJ97
..... unequivocal categorical and unambiguous and does not permit any other kind of construction but a singular one section 50 4 proviso as inserted by act of 2004 dipak misra krishn kumar .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSuman Santosh Kumar Patel Vs. Bhanwati Mahesh Pratap Patel and anr.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-01-1998
Reported in: 1999(1)MPLJ88
..... unequivocal categorical and unambiguous and does not permit any other kind of construction but a singular one section 50 4 proviso as inserted by act of 2004 dipak misra krishn kumar .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNawal Kishore Jagannath Prasad Vs. State of M.P.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-17-1998
Reported in: 1999(1)MPLJ167
..... unequivocal categorical and unambiguous and does not permit any other kind of construction but a singular one section 50 4 proviso as inserted by act of 2004 dipak misra krishn kumar .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTN.D. Singhal Vs. State of M.P. and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-10-1998
Reported in: I(1999)ACC39; 1999(1)MPLJ118
..... unequivocal categorical and unambiguous and does not permit any other kind of construction but a singular one section 50 4 proviso as inserted by act of 2004 dipak misra krishn kumar .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTChandrawati Wd/O Surjanram and ors. Vs. Ganesh Prasad Lakshmi Prasad a ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-18-1998
Reported in: 1999(1)MPLJ107
..... unequivocal categorical and unambiguous and does not permit any other kind of construction but a singular one section 50 4 proviso as inserted by act of 2004 dipak misra krishn kumar .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Commissioner of Income-tax, Madras Vs. Urmila Ramesh
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jan-23-1998
Reported in: AIR1998SC2640; (1998)146CTR(SC)81; [1998]230ITR422(SC); JT1998(1)SC208; 1998(1)SCALE206; (1998)3SCC6; [1998]1SCR323
..... social security is not the only goal of a good society our country is taking singular pride in the democratic ideals enshrined in its constitution and the most cherished of these .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial