Building Code - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: building code Year: 1956 Page 1 of about 212 results (0.245 seconds)Sheikh Ahmad Shaikh Mohamad Patil Vs. Devram Kalyanji and Co.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Dec-11-1956
Reported in: (1957)59BOMLR282
..... 60 sub section 1 clause c of the civil procedure code lays down that the houses and other buildings with the materials and the sites thereof ..... to the judgment debtor under order xxi rule 66 of the civil procedure code the judgment debtor failed to appear in answer to the notice ..... entitled to claim protection under section 60 1 c of the code if he acquires the status of an agriculturist and occupies the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMt. Daroupadi Debi and anr. Vs. S.K. Dutt and anr.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jan-13-1956
Reported in: AIR1957All48
..... to have been infringed did not enjoy that privacy from other buildings and therefore the plaintiff of that suit could not object to ..... the cross objection it is true that the provisions of the code of civil procedure unless excluded by any particular provisions would apply ..... should be found in the letters patent and not in the code of civil procedure whose procedural provisions were to apply to the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRamakrishan Rao Alias Baburao Vs. Srinivasarao and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-22-1956
Reported in: AIR1960AP449
..... taking into consideration additional evidence all india services act 1951 sections 8 11 a p buildings lease rent and eviction control rules 1961 rule 5 v v s rao g yethirajulu ..... not make him a sanyasi ii admission of additional evidence order 41 rule 27 of code of civil procedure 1908 additional evidence can only be permitted if the case cannot be .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMillinery Center Building Corp. Vs. Commissioner
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-26-1956
..... and that no annual depreciation could be taken because the cost of the building had already been fully depreciated and the purchase price could not be ..... 000 held 1 under 23 a 1 a of the internal revenue code of 1939 the purchase price paid by petitioner represents the cost of ..... of doing business under 23 a of the united states internal revenue code of 1939 or under 23 f as a loss on a transaction .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMehnga Ram Vs. Labour Appellate Tribunal of India at Lucknow and anr.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Apr-09-1956
Reported in: AIR1956All644; (1957)ILLJ603All
..... for the purposes of any investigation enquiry or adjudication enter any building factory workshop or other place or premises whatsoever and interrogate ..... charged collected some others in front of the main office building and instigated them to commit acts of violence they further ..... in respect of procedure also only some provisions of the code of civil procedure are made applicable by section 11 and .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAsha Bibi and ors. Vs. Nabissa Sahib and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-27-1956
Reported in: AIR1957Mad583
..... herself as the sole person entitled to administer the trust that the building were in a state of disrepair that there was gross mismanagement ..... the sanction of the advocate general under rule 92 of the code of civil procedure asking that a scheme may be framed as ..... the 1st defendant family private trust sections 9 and 92 of code of civil procedure 1908 muhammadan law and section 3 mussalman wakf .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMichael Anthony Rodrigues Vs. State of Bombay and ors.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jan-19-1956
Reported in: AIR1956Bom501
..... in india residence is purely an incidental factor which goes up to build domicile 4 in these circumstances let us proceed to consider the facts ..... india and residence was purely an incidental factor which goes up to build domicile it was held that on facts that the petitioner who was ..... indian national in spite of his long residence in india indian penal code 1860 c a no 45 1860 sections 124 a 153 a 153 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTT. S. M. O. Mohamed Othuman Sahib Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Madr ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-07-1956
Reported in: [1957]31ITR480(Mad)
allocated to the sale of the land apart from the building out of this again 1 5th was excluded as 1 gain assessable to tax under section 12 b of the indian income tax act i e with reference to the sale
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMohamed Othuman Sahib, Melapalayam Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Mad ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-07-1956
Reported in: AIR1957Mad422
fact that building operations commenced in 1944 and the school building was occupied even in 1944 45 the assessee admittedly received 1 whether the provisions of section 12 b of the indian income tax act imposing a tax on capital gains are
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMachinery Manufacturers Corporation Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-ta ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Sep-12-1956
Reported in: [1957]31ITR203(Bom)
section 10 2 vi in this very case because the building was completed at the end of the year of account
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial