Building Code - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: building code Year: 1935 Page 1 of about 178 results (0.234 seconds)Pennsylvania Vs. Williams
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Feb-04-1935
..... a shareholder for the appointment of receivers to liquidate an insolvent building and loan association allegations of diversity of citizenship and requisite jurisdictional ..... unchallenged is within the jurisdiction of the federal district court jud code 24 28 u s c 41 1 p 294 u s ..... the statutes of the united states as incorporated in the judicial code c 231 24 1 36 stat 1087 1091 provide that district .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTW. B. Worthen Co. Vs. Kavanaugh
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-01-1935
..... pay upholders of the challenged acts appeal to the authority of home building loan assn v blaisdell supra the case of the minnesota moratorium there ..... v thomas 292 u s 426 292 u s 433 distinguishing home building loan assn v blaisdell supra we state the outermost limits only in ..... 2d 80 three judges dissented the case is here upon appeal judicial code 237 28 u s c 344 to know the obligation of a .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPokhar Singh Vs. Tula Ram
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jul-20-1935
Reported in: AIR1935All1016; 158Ind.Cas.202
..... or sale among these particulars are houses and other buildings belonging to an agriculturist and occupied by him 6 it ..... at a later stage 5 the scheme of the new civil procedure code is flat identical order 21 rule 61 which corresponds to ..... section 60 which is embodied in the substantive part of the civil procedure code provides that certain particulars shall not be liable to attachment .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAbdul Rehman Mohamud Yusuf Vs. Sir Phiroze Cursetji Sethna
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Oct-08-1935
Reported in: AIR1936Bom88; (1936)38BOMLR34
fazulbhoy currimbhoy defendant no 2 sent the rent for the building due from august 16 to the end of september 1923 having regard to proviso 4 to section 92 of the indian evidence act inasmuch as it would amount in my opinion
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShambhuprasad Umiashankar Vs. Lalbhai Bhikhabhai Shah
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Oct-03-1935
Reported in: AIR1936Bom219; (1936)38BOMLR264; 163Ind.Cas.293
the reason i have already given viz that the defendants building may not always be there it is impossible to say defendants raised their building and cut off the pankh the indian easements act states in what circumstances an easement may be
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTinderjit Rai and ors. Vs. Gajadhar Raj and anr.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Mar-05-1935
Reported in: AIR1935All967
area of 4 bighas which has now been turned into building land there is no provision in the act by which in my opinion bar the plaintiffs from coming to a civil court in the present suit i consider that the decree
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNadirsha Hormusji Sidhwa Vs. Krishnabai Bala
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Nov-15-1935
Reported in: AIR1936Bom199; (1936)38BOMLR280; 163Ind.Cas.79
not engaged in the construction repair or demolition of a building painting not being repair within the meaning of the schedule
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSantosh Kumar Ghose Vs. Srimati Giri Bala Dassi
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-08-1935
Reported in: 164Ind.Cas.787
the acquisition of the land and the construction of the building described in schedule ga were monies which accrued out of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBaijnath Ram Vs. Emperor
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Sep-23-1935
Reported in: AIR1936All56; 160Ind.Cas.927
..... armed with this sanction the applicant forthwith started the construction of the building in accordance with the approved plan on 5th july 1934 some ..... to pass an order on 25th may 1934 sanctioning the proposed building in accordance with the plan submitted by the applicant with the ..... as are made by the high court under section 122 of that code it is clear from the above that a person aggrieved by .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSadhu Charan Biswas Vs. Paban Mandal Being Dead His Heirs and Legal Re ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jan-10-1935
Reported in: 164Ind.Cas.264
measures the different points of the settlement map with the civil court commissioner s map they being not on the same
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial