Skip to content

Did you mean: holding out?


Building Code - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: building code Year: 1935 Page 1 of about 178 results (0.234 seconds)
Feb 04 1935 (FN)

Pennsylvania Vs. Williams

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Feb-04-1935

..... a shareholder for the appointment of receivers to liquidate an insolvent building and loan association allegations of diversity of citizenship and requisite jurisdictional ..... unchallenged is within the jurisdiction of the federal district court jud code 24 28 u s c 41 1 p 294 u s ..... the statutes of the united states as incorporated in the judicial code c 231 24 1 36 stat 1087 1091 provide that district .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 01 1935 (FN)

W. B. Worthen Co. Vs. Kavanaugh

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Apr-01-1935

..... pay upholders of the challenged acts appeal to the authority of home building loan assn v blaisdell supra the case of the minnesota moratorium there ..... v thomas 292 u s 426 292 u s 433 distinguishing home building loan assn v blaisdell supra we state the outermost limits only in ..... 2d 80 three judges dissented the case is here upon appeal judicial code 237 28 u s c 344 to know the obligation of a .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 20 1935 (PC)

Pokhar Singh Vs. Tula Ram

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Jul-20-1935

Reported in: AIR1935All1016; 158Ind.Cas.202

..... or sale among these particulars are houses and other buildings belonging to an agriculturist and occupied by him 6 it ..... at a later stage 5 the scheme of the new civil procedure code is flat identical order 21 rule 61 which corresponds to ..... section 60 which is embodied in the substantive part of the civil procedure code provides that certain particulars shall not be liable to attachment .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 08 1935 (PC)

Abdul Rehman Mohamud Yusuf Vs. Sir Phiroze Cursetji Sethna

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Oct-08-1935

Reported in: AIR1936Bom88; (1936)38BOMLR34

fazulbhoy currimbhoy defendant no 2 sent the rent for the building due from august 16 to the end of september 1923 having regard to proviso 4 to section 92 of the indian evidence act inasmuch as it would amount in my opinion

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 03 1935 (PC)

Shambhuprasad Umiashankar Vs. Lalbhai Bhikhabhai Shah

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Oct-03-1935

Reported in: AIR1936Bom219; (1936)38BOMLR264; 163Ind.Cas.293

the reason i have already given viz that the defendants building may not always be there it is impossible to say defendants raised their building and cut off the pankh the indian easements act states in what circumstances an easement may be

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 05 1935 (PC)

inderjit Rai and ors. Vs. Gajadhar Raj and anr.

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Mar-05-1935

Reported in: AIR1935All967

area of 4 bighas which has now been turned into building land there is no provision in the act by which in my opinion bar the plaintiffs from coming to a civil court in the present suit i consider that the decree

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 15 1935 (PC)

Nadirsha Hormusji Sidhwa Vs. Krishnabai Bala

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Nov-15-1935

Reported in: AIR1936Bom199; (1936)38BOMLR280; 163Ind.Cas.79

not engaged in the construction repair or demolition of a building painting not being repair within the meaning of the schedule

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 08 1935 (PC)

Santosh Kumar Ghose Vs. Srimati Giri Bala Dassi

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Mar-08-1935

Reported in: 164Ind.Cas.787

the acquisition of the land and the construction of the building described in schedule ga were monies which accrued out of

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 23 1935 (PC)

Baijnath Ram Vs. Emperor

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Sep-23-1935

Reported in: AIR1936All56; 160Ind.Cas.927

..... armed with this sanction the applicant forthwith started the construction of the building in accordance with the approved plan on 5th july 1934 some ..... to pass an order on 25th may 1934 sanctioning the proposed building in accordance with the plan submitted by the applicant with the ..... as are made by the high court under section 122 of that code it is clear from the above that a person aggrieved by .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 10 1935 (PC)

Sadhu Charan Biswas Vs. Paban Mandal Being Dead His Heirs and Legal Re ...

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Jan-10-1935

Reported in: 164Ind.Cas.264

measures the different points of the settlement map with the civil court commissioner s map they being not on the same

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //