Building Code - Judgment Search Results

Janki Prasad and ors. Vs. Karamat HusaIn and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1931All674; 137Ind.Cas.578

..... w n 158 hall v c granted an injunction to prevent building operations being proceeded with during the night to the annoyance ..... and sometimes it cannot be heard at all anywhere in the building most ordinary people may i think attend this church without ..... it is a private building or a public temple it is true that certain powers exist in the criminal procedure code under which the magistrate .....

Manilal Lallubhai Patel Vs. Kikabhai Lallubhai

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1931)33BOMLR1118

..... been burnt down without obstruction from the defendant the plaintiff was obstructed when he was building and pending the proceedings the defendant died an application was made to bring his sons ..... pendency of the execution proceedings the decree can be enforced under section 50 of the civil procedure code against the son as his legal representative by proceeding under order xxi rule 32 sakarlal .....

Kali Matathil Veeran Kutty's son Avaru Vs. Asi Bai and Ors.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1931)61MLJ462

what are known as kudiyiruppu or vacant sites available for buildings 20 the present case as it relates to a claim the time that is 1887 the local legislature under the indian councils act of 1861 could not pass legislation affecting the

Shankar Yesu Kargutkar Vs. H.H. Khem Sawant

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: AIR1932Bom3; (1931)33BOMLR1303

..... for possession of the property in suit after removal of the buildings which defendants had built on the land for arrears of rent ..... of the country under section 83 of the bombay land revenue code 2 two appeals were preferred against this decree one by ..... tenancy compromise of doubtful claim joint hindu family bound by compromise civil procedure code act v of 1908 section 11 res judicata assertion of .....

Nanjibhai Jethabhai Vs. Popatlal Shriraj

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1932)34BOMLR628

to date including the costs of the amendment civil procedure code act v of 1908 order iii rule 2 a amended

Avaru Vs. Asi Bai and ors.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1932Mad8

other words it is neither an agricultural holding nor a building site available for building purposes he also held that in the time that is 1887 the local legislature under the indian councils act 1861 could not pass legislation affecting the operation

(Sri Kanchumarti) Venkata Krishnayya Garu Vs. Secy. of State

Court: Privy Council

judge on survey no 119 b 2 treating it as building land as however the case has to go back with

Collector of Chingleput Vs. Krishnaveni Ammal

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1933Mad190; 145Ind.Cas.604

that is to say if four grounds are granted as building site one ground will be occupied by the house and

Nityagopal Sen Poddar and ors. Vs. Secy. of State

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1933Cal25

plots nos 1 2 and 3 on which there are buildings and a big tank with a pucca ghat the collector

Municipal Board Vs. Mt. Ram Sri and anr.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1931All670

the original owner of the land should be prohibited from building on it no question of title can be decided by