Skip to content

Did you mean: holding out?


Building Code - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: building code Year: 1942 Page 1 of about 113 results (0.262 seconds)
Aug 05 1942 (PC)

Chandulal Vadilal Vs. Government of the Province of Bombay

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Aug-05-1942

Reported in: AIR1943Bom138; (1943)45BOMLR197

..... we must assume that the land was assessed for building purposes and there appears to be no section of the land revenue code and no rule which entitles the collector to levy ..... section 65 of the code and rule 82 made under that act when upon land already assessed for building purposes the owner proceeds to erect new buildings though those new buildings may be of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 17 1942 (PC)

In Re: Varadaraja Padayachi

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jul-17-1942

Reported in: AIR1943Mad521

..... of housebreaking as well as of theft in a building as section 454 penal code requires that a sentence of imprisonment should be given ..... mayavaram of an offence punishable under sections 454 and 380 penal code and was released under section 562 criminal p c upon ..... exceeding seven years whereas an offence punishable under section 454 penal code is punishable with ten years rigorous imprisonment i do not .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 30 1942 (FN)

Carpenters and Joiners Vs. Ritter's Cafe

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Mar-30-1942

..... connection with the dispute texas has not attempted to protect other business enterprises of the building contractor plaster who is the petitioners real adversary we need not therefore consider problems that ..... holding the petitioners activities to constitute a violation of the state antitrust law texas penal code art 1632 et seq the texas court of civil appeals enjoined them from picketing ritter .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 11 1942 (PC)

The Salem Municipal Council Vs. G.F.F. Foulkes

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Dec-11-1942

Reported in: AIR1943Mad674; (1943)2MLJ183

to make a beneficial use of these as of the building itself not during his absence but when he returns and conclusion of the learned district munsiff and accordingly dismiss the civil revision petition with costs most of these authorities turn upon

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 16 1942 (PC)

Bengal Jute Mills Vs. Jewraj Heeralal

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Jun-16-1942

Reported in: AIR1943Cal13

its merits the relevant provisions of order 3 of the code are as follows rule 1 any application to any court

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 17 1942 (PC)

Province of Bengal Vs. Corporation of Calcutta

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Feb-17-1942

Reported in: AIR1942Cal418

127 b 5 of 20 x the annual rentthat the buildingwould fetchi e the annual rentthus ultimately the method suggested by relates to the assessment of 27 chowringhee known as the indian museum the area of the land in the premises is

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 23 1942 (PC)

Dr. Brij Behari Lal Vs. Emperor Through Municipal Board

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Dec-23-1942

Reported in: AIR1943All123

..... be provided for larger municipalities where there would be many more building disputes than in smaller municipalities and it is difficult to conceive ..... section 107 civil p c or in the sections of the criminal procedure code mentioned above according to the requirements of any given case for ..... that the municipalities act has provided a self contained code for the redress of wrongs and a citizen has to .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 19 1942 (PC)

The Secretary of State for India Vs. Sri NaraIn Khanna

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Mar-19-1942

Reported in: (1942)44BOMLR788

and that the only compensation due was compensation for the buildings which alone were compulsorily acquired they would appear to have

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 15 1942 (PC)

NasiruddIn Vs. Emperor

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Oct-15-1942

Reported in: AIR1943All47

to expire that he proceeded to the completion of his building but there is no evidence on the record on the

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 23 1942 (PC)

Rao Bahadur V. Ranganathan Chettiar and ors. Vs. Mariappa Mudali and o ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Oct-23-1942

Reported in: AIR1943Mad386; (1943)1MLJ102

him requiring him to surrender possession of the land and building and offering to pay compensation for the building and trees protection act 1921 had not been complied with the city civil court accepted the plea of the defendants that the suit

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //