Building Code - Judgment Search Results

The Advocate-general of Bombay Vs. Haji Esmail Hassam

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 5Ind.Cas.213

..... iii of 1888 sections 64 349a and 349b construction of sections height of buildings commissioner s powers civil procedure code act v of 1908 sections 79 91 public nuisance actual nuisance constructive ..... wrote to the commissioner through his attorneys payne company requesting permission to raise his building for architectural purposes above the prescribed limit of 70 feet mr sheppard endorsed his .....

In Re: Loganath Aiyar and ors.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 4Ind.Cas.700

..... it had set fire to the buildings other than the police station under section 142 indian penal code whoever being aware of facts which ..... displayed by it of open defiance to constituted authority every public building in tinnevelly town except the sub registrar s office was ..... and marched into tinnevelly town whence the smoke of the burning buildings was visible in swami sannadhi street they met a large .....

The Advocate-general of Bombay Vs. Haji Ismail Hasham

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1910)12BOMLR274

..... defendant wrote to the commissioner through his attorneys payne co requesting permission to raise his building for architectural purposes above the prescribed limit of 70 ft mr shepherd endorsed his ..... cases of public nuisance advocate general has same powers as the attorney general in england civil procedure code act v of 1908 section 91 powers of advocate general limited under this section .....

L.O. Clarke Vs. Brojendra Kishore Roy Chowdhry

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (1909)ILR36Cal433

..... should have proceeded with greater circumspection in searching one cutchery than in searching the other buildings 88 the real question however appears to be whether the directions in section 25 of ..... section under which it is sought to justify the appellant is section 165 of the criminal procedure code that section provides that whenever a police officer making an investigation considers that the .....

Rio Grande Dam and Irrigation Co. Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the suit was brought by the government to enjoin it from so building a dam as to interfere with the navigability of an international ..... to both sides to adduce further evidence under the provisions of the code of new mexico allowing supplemental pleadings alleging facts material to the ..... demurrer or reply compiled laws of new mexico 1907 title 33 code of civil procedure c 1 art 4 subsec 46 on the .....

Devi Prasad Vs. A.H. Lewis

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: (1909)ILR31All304

..... of a decree they are as follows land houses or other buildings goods money bank notes cheques bills of exchange hundis promissory notes ..... is dismissed but without costs as the respondent is not represented code of civil procedure act no xiv of 1882 section 266 execution ..... in execution of a decree neither the old nor the new code contains any provision for the attachment in advance of the salary .....

Debi Prasada Vs. A.H. Lewis

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 1Ind.Cas.186

..... of a decree they are as follows land houses or other buildings goods money bank notes cheques bills of exchange hundis promissory notes ..... is dismissed but without costs as the respondent is not represented civil procedure code act xiv of 1882 sections 266 and 268 attachment of ..... in execution of a decree neither the old nor the new code contains any provision for the attachment in advance of the .....

HusaIn Bukhsh and ors. Vs. Hafiz Musahib Khan and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 5Ind.Cas.179

karamat husain j 1 the plaintiff hafiz musahib khan instituted a suit against husain bukhsh musammat amiro and mohammad hanif...

Kisandas Rupchand and ors. Vs. Rachappa Vithoba Shilvant and ors.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 4Ind.Cas.726

they are contained in order vi rule 17 of the code which is substantially identical with order xxviii rule 1 of

Bhagwan Das Vs. Rash Behari Mullick

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 6Ind.Cas.595

answer for him to say if for instance the proposed buildings had been refused sanction that he was entitled under his not the parties be left to their remedies in the civil courts especially when the alterations had in fact been sanctioned