Building Code - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: building code Year: 1939 Page 1 of about 150 results (0.242 seconds)Bowen Vs. Johnston
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-30-1939
..... erection of a fort magazine arsenal dockyard or other needful building crim code 272 18 u s c 451 third the last clause ..... be acquired for custom houses post offices arsenals other public buildings whatever or for any other purposes of government and which ..... be acquired for custom houses post offices arsenals other public buildings whatever or for any other purposes of government georgia laws .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRaichand Gulabchand Accha Vs. the Secretary of State for India
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Feb-27-1939
Reported in: AIR1939Bom505; (1939)41BOMLR1077
..... land they were not exempt under section 65 of the bombay land revenue code for among the exempted buildings were those which enabled the agriculturist to live on the land and to ..... land they were not exempt under section 65 of the bombay land revenue code for among the exempted buildings were those which enabled the agriculturist to live on the land and to .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIn Re: Villi Chinnu Alias Kandan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-10-1939
Reported in: (1939)1MLJ617
..... concurrently 2 there was house breaking by night and theft in the building of p w 1 on the night of 15th august 1938 ..... handed the conviction under sections 457 and 380 of the indian penal code is therefore right and the appellant admitted his previous convictions he ..... would therefore be liable to enhanced punishment under section 75 indian penal code and section 23 1 a of the criminal tribes act but .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIn Re: Balam Pateyya and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-20-1939
Reported in: AIR1941Mad339
..... 68 to 66 related to the offence of theft in a building against all the accused in the respective houses referred to in ..... the remaining accused constructively by the operation of section 149 penal code counts 30 to 44 were in respect of the offence of ..... relating to the offence of housebreaking punishable under section 455 penal code against all the accused in the respective houses referred to in .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTChhadami Vs. Emperor
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Nov-29-1939
Reported in: AIR1940All259
..... has a right to exclude or eject the trespasser from the building tent or vessel which is the subject of the trespass is ..... from the evidence amounts to lurking house trespass section 443 penal code provides whoever commits house trespass having taken precautions to conceal such ..... we alter the conviction to a conviction under section 451 penal code and we reduce the sentence to one year s rigorous .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCorporation of Calcutta Vs. Province of Bengal
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-24-1939
Reported in: AIR1940Cal47
clause a deals with two subjects i bare land ii building used for hire but clause b deals with buildings only in the premises occupied by the offices of the east indian railway administration we accordingly assess the present value of the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHari Chand Vs. Secretary of State
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jun-30-1939
Reported in: (1940)42BOMLR138
of the said land and to obtain possession of the buildings standing thereon take notice therefore that government will under all under the land acquisition act to follow forth all the procedure which that statute lays down right up to and including
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSheikh NizamuddIn Vs. Corporation of Calcutta
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-01-1939
Reported in: AIR1940Cal11
decide is whether on these facts the resolution of the building standing committee passed on 28th june 1935 was ultra vires section 498 of the act in the chapter relating to procedure this section provides inter alia that every written permission granted
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTK.A.V. Karuppanna Nadar Vs. M.K. Mathalai Karuppa Nadar
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-24-1939
Reported in: AIR1939Mad776; (1939)2MLJ226
that the first defendant is in physical possession of the building and that plaintiff should ask for recovery of its possession
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income Tax, Madras Vs. Bosotto Brothers Limited, Madra ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-23-1939
Reported in: [1940]8ITR41(Mad)
that what was let in this particular case was a building in the decision mangalagiri rice factory v commissioner of income under the provisions of section 10 2 vi of the indian income tax act 1922 the income tax officer refused to
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial