Skip to content

Did you mean: holding out?


Building Code - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: building code Year: 1929 Page 1 of about 162 results (0.23 seconds)
Jun 05 1929 (PC)

The Raipur Manufacturing Co. Ltd. Vs. the Ahmedabad Municipality

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jun-05-1929

Reported in: (1929)31BOMLR1224; 122Ind.Cas.430

..... of vol 1 of the ahmedabad municipal code p 159 under rule i clause 1 buildings have the meaning in section 3 sub ..... present findings until the end of may 1923 the appellant s buildings and lands were exempted the respondent have acted prudently in giving ..... of immediate penalty enough time from which the tax becomes payable building assessable to the tax the plaintiff company occupied an extensive piece .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 18 1929 (FN)

Larson Vs. South Dakota

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Feb-18-1929

..... the letting and granting of exclusive ferry leases provides for the building of bridges over the rivers of south dakota this close relation ..... the missouri river under the authority of 2109 south dakota revised code of 1919 petitioner alleged in his complaint that he was granted ..... ferry franchises under 8696 to 8704 of the same code section 8696 provided it shall be unlawful for any person to .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 11 1929 (PC)

Muthuswami Servaigaran and anr. Vs. Thangammal Ayiyar

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Oct-11-1929

Reported in: AIR1930Mad242; (1930)58MLJ148

..... magistrate of pattukottai in exercise of his powers under section 144 criminal procedure code directed the petitioners to vacate the nagaram palace building forthwith on the ground that the occupation caused annoyance and ..... is dismissed as the order expired before the petition was presented the present code like the code of 1898 and that of 1882 merely speaks of proceedings and not judicial .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 03 1929 (FN)

Sinclair Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-03-1929

..... not alleged proved or found that any of the publications was brought into the court building or read by the judge and therefore he lacked power to punish under 268 judicial ..... fails to show misbehavior by appellants which obstructed the administration of justice within 268 judicial code since there is neither averment nor evidence that any operative actually approached or communicated with .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 01 1929 (PC)

In Re: Sami Karuppa thevan

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Aug-01-1929

Reported in: 122Ind.Cas.655; (1929)57MLJ743

..... house breaking by night and theft in a building punishable under sections 457 and 380 indian penal code the 2nd accused was charged in addition ..... with liability to enhanced punishment under section 75 indian penal code and section 23 1 6 of act vi of 1924 the ..... and 3rd accused guilty under sections 457 and 380 indan penal code 2 the 1st accused was acquitted the 3rd accused was sentenced .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 07 1929 (PC)

Ahmed Sulleman Dinath Vs. the Municipal Commissioner of Bombay

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Nov-07-1929

Reported in: AIR1930Bom231; (1930)32BOMLR178

..... bombay small cause court as to the rateable value of a building under section 219 of the city of bombay municipal act 1888 ..... conclusive does not debar such remedy under section 115 of the code of civil procedure 3 even in england with the remedy of ..... of bombay small came court chief judge persona designate revision application civil procedure code act v of 1908 section 115 the decision by the chief .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 13 1929 (PC)

Emperor Vs. Dinbandhu Ooriya

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Nov-13-1929

Reported in: AIR1930Cal199

of reference by the additional sessions judge under section 374 criminal p c 2 on behalf of the prisoner it does

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 13 1929 (PC)

Emperor Vs. Dinabandhu Ooriya

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Nov-13-1929

Reported in: 124Ind.Cas.818

learned brother in the order that he has made penal code act xlv of 1860 sections 300 1 302 murder accused

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 01 1929 (PC)

R. Rathnasabapathy Chettiar Vs. Ammakannammal and ors.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: May-01-1929

Reported in: AIR1930Mad78; (1929)57MLJ609

was called for to take accounts as to what a building known as kilton cost for construction and how much of have applications for particulars of allegations in pleadings in an indian court i think that what happens is that the juniors

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 27 1929 (PC)

The Nedungadi Bank, Ltd. Vs. the Official Assignee of Madras

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Nov-27-1929

Reported in: AIR1929Mad184; (1930)59MLJ22

is made under rule 5 of order 6 civil procedure code for delivery of particulars the court has no jurisdiction to

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //