Building Code - Judgment Search Results

Krishan Doyal Jalan Vs. the Corporation of Calcutta

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 101Ind.Cas.183

..... 1923 sections 3 363 488 and 536 criminal procedure code act v of 1898 sections 1 4 e 5 2 and 342 proceedings for demolition of buildings criminal procedure code whether applies administration of oath to ..... municipal magistrate provides that if the corporation are satisfied that the erection of any building has been commenced without obtaining the written permission of the corporation they may after .....

The Public Prosecutor Vs. Budipiti Devasikamani

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1928)55MLJ228

..... the kitchen and ran away the thatch caught fire and the school building was completely destroyed the learned sessions judge found that the accused ..... set fire to the school building but acquitted him on the ground that he was insane at ..... of the indian penal code the prosecution case is that the accused took a torch from the kitchen ran to the building put it to .....

United States Vs. Alford

Court: US Supreme Court

..... 36 stat 855 857 amending 53 of the penal code of march 4 1909 whoever shall build a fire in or near any forest timber ..... justice holmes delivered the opinion of the court alford was indicted for building a fire near inflammable grass and other inflammable material and timber ..... to on the ground that the statute concerned does not cover the building or leaving of fires at any place except upon a forest .....

The Secretary of State for India Vs. Abdul Husen Dosaji Godwala

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: AIR1927Bom601; (1927)29BOMLR1350

..... it was only a small portion that was covered by the building that there was a previously existing structure used for agricultural purposes ..... land revenue code bom act v of 1879 sections 66 and 148 agricultural land building of residential house on portion of land building fine fine ..... is meant by building site we must refer to the definition in section 3 cl 9 of the bombay land revenue code that point .....

Dhanna Mal Vs. Moti Sagar

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1927)29BOMLR870

..... was not permanent and that ejectment subject to removal of the buildings was rightly decreed judgment of the high court affirmed section 31 ..... decree for enhanced rent res judicata continued payment of enhanced rent code of civil procedure act v of 1908 sections 11 100 ..... the high court in second appeal under sections 100 and 101 civil procedure code 3 that as enhanced rent continued to be paid as also .....

Corporation of Calcutta Vs. Jalajbasini Debi

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1928Cal450

..... some reason or other has included in the valuation of the buildings sections 350 for the electric light installation the corporation never claimed ..... the cross objection of the assessee regarding the valuation of the building is allowed with costs we assess the hearing fee in ..... that this is not a second appeal as contemplated by the civil procedure code and that section 100 and section 101 civil p c .....

(Kanchumarti) Venkata Krishnayya Garu Vs. Secretary of State

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1928Mad89

he is entitled to take into consideration its adaptability for building land because that is a fact which is in existence substence the principle to be derived from the english and indian decisions and applicable to the present circumstances a summary of

Sitara Shahjahan Begam and anr. Vs. Munna and anr.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1927All342

where a tenant has erected kachcha buildings or kachcha pucca buildings or pucca buildings and i do not see where any

Debendra Nath Bagchi and ors. Vs. Surendra Nath Sur

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1927Cal345

of this appeal to have a view of the plaintiffs building on the evidence on this point and having regard to no 43 bagh bazar street further having regard to the procedure which is usually followed by the officers who make these

Secretary of State Vs. Makhan Das

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1928All147

on the owner of a valuable site acquired for a building scheme may have to suspend the execution of his project to the right of second appeal conferred by section 100 civil p c 5 the u p town improvements act has