Building Code - Judgment Search Results

Van BrocklIn Vs. Tennessee

Court: US Supreme Court

..... thereon light houses lightkeepers dwellings life saving stations buoys and coal depots and buildings connected therewith code 1883 3080 3082 ohio all property whether real or personal belonging exclusively to ..... all property real or personal belonging to the united states rev code 1871 1662 missouri lands and lots public buildings and structures with their furniture and equipments belonging to the .....

Santa Clara County Vs. Southern Pacific R. Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... not define what are improvements upon land the political code of the state expressly declares that the term improvements includes all buildings structures fixtures fences and improvements erected upon or affixed ..... upon which rest existing regulations for the assessments of depots station grounds shops and buildings of a railroad company operated in more than one county would apply equally to .....

The Queen-empress Vs. Krishna Reddi

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1897)7MLJ95

1 the deputy magistrate is wrong in supposing that an encroachment by a private person building over a portion of a public street is not a public nuisance within the meaning ..... of section 268 indian penal code or that it is necessary for the prosecution in such a case to adduce evidence .....

Kansas City, L. and So. Kans. R. Co. Vs. Attorney General

Court: US Supreme Court

certainty that congress had in view the single purpose of building one road down the neosho valley from fort riley to its name by page 118 u s 687 a valid procedure into that of the missouri kansas and texas railroad company

United States Vs. Central Pacific Railroad Company

Court: US Supreme Court

the bonds issued by the united states to aid in building the road by the act of july 2 1864 only

The Shamnugger Jute Factory Co., Ld. and anr. Vs. Ram NaraIn Chatterje ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (1887)ILR14Cal189

bank might it not buy land to prevent some one building a wall which would bar the road to the river other side it was contended chiefly on the authority of indian decisions that every act of one part owner of land

Anderson Vs. Santa Ana

Court: US Supreme Court

trustees in uniting districts and levying and collecting taxes for building houses and for the support of schools therein and provided

Coffey Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

the provisions of sections 126 and 386 of the civil code of practice of kentucky which took effect january 1 1877

Wright Vs. Kentucky and Great Eastern Ry. Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

state and may subscribe stock in or aid in the building of any other road in or out of this state

Gopal Chandra Lahiri Vs. Solomon

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (1886)ILR13Cal62

..... it will be found that in the case of the manchester economic building society the fact which was made the ground for allowing the appeal ..... both to the letter and the spirit of section 623 of the code it may be difficult no doubt and perhaps undesirable to attempt ..... by law i agree with the chief justice review mistake of counsel civil procedure code act xiv of 1882 section 623 limitation act xv of 1877 .....