Building Code - Judgment Search Results

Beasley Vs. Texas and Pacific Railway Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the louisiana code recognizes such servitudes as the prohibition of building on an estate or of building above a particular height rev civil code art 728 ..... be dismissed the bill seeks to enjoin the railway company from building a depot within three miles of one already built at ..... for the transfer that the grantee or its assigns shall not build or establish any other depot along the line of said .....

Dhondhai Singh Vs. Follet

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (1904)ILR31Cal48

..... the manager has no actual juridical possession a servant or a bailiff occupying land or buildings in a ministerial character does not acquire possession pollock and wright on possession p 56 ..... are not residents within the appellate jurisdiction of the high court section 145 of the code of criminal procedure provides that whenever a district magistrate sub divisional magistrate or a magistrate .....

ismai Kani Rowthan Vs. Nazarali Sahib and anr.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1904)14MLJ25

to the site being required for the erection of a building thereon for the thaikkal was to apply only if the cases arising from contracts vide section 16 of the madras civil courts act and such cases must be governed by the

United States Vs. Lynah

Court: US Supreme Court

the united states has built and maintained and is now building and maintaining in and across the savannah river in the

Defiance Water Co. Vs. Defiance

Court: US Supreme Court

the petition alleging that this is a suit of a civil nature in which there is a controversy arising under the

Arbuckle Vs. Blackburn

Court: US Supreme Court

courts of the several states of all suits of a civil nature at common law or in equity where the matter

Hartford Fire Ins. Co. Vs. Wilson

Court: US Supreme Court

held cannot be done northern assurance company v grand view building association 183 u s 308 with reference to this question

Texas and Pacific Ry. Co. Vs. Watson

Court: US Supreme Court

main shops of the defendant having to do with the building of boilers and was in special control of the part

Brill Vs. Peckham Motor Truck Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

october 15 1900 in the same court against another truck building company and a motion for preliminary injunction was heard in

Veeranna Pillai and anr. Vs. Muthukumaru Asari and ors.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1903)13MLJ439

the notion that explanation ii to 13 of civil procedure code had introduced a change in the law of res judicata