Delhi Court March 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Gore Lal Mahto vs Union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ FAO 274/2019 GORE LAL MAHTO .....Appellant Through: Mr, Rajan Sood, Ms. Ashima Sood and Ms Megha Sood, AdvocatesversusUNION OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Ms. Arunima Dwivedi CGSC, Ms. Himanshi and Ms. Monalisha Pradhan, AdvocatesCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRIORDER% 30.03.20261. The present appeal has been filed under Section 23 of the RailwayClaims Tribunal Act, 1987 assailing the judgment dated 12.11.2018, passed by the Railway Claims Tribunal, Principal Bench, Delhi in Claim Application No. OA (IIU) No. 315/2017, titled as Gore Lal Mahto v. Union of India.2. Vide the aforesaid judgment, the learned Tribunal dismissed the claimapplication filed by the appellant herein on the ground that he was neither a bona fide passenger nor that the alleged incident constituted an untoward incident within the meaning of the Railways Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as the Act).3. Briefly stated, the facts of the case, as set out i...
Intertek India Private Limited vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
$~J * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment pronounced on: 30.03.2026 + W.P.(C) 9613/2024 and CM APPL.39451/2024 INTERTEK INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Darpan Wadhwa, Sr. Adv. along with Ms. Sarul Jain, Mr. Amer Vaid, Ms. Divita Vyas, Advocates and Mr. Saurabh Malhotra, AR.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Abhishek Goyal and Ms. Megha Anand, Advocates along with Mr. Ashwani Bharti (AGM, BHEL), Mr. Amardeep Srivastava (DGM, BHEL), Mr. Abhishek Arora (Manager, BHEL) and Mr. Amol Aggarwal (Manager, BHEL). Ms. Shweta Bharti, Ms. Tejaswini Chandrasekhar, Ms. Nikita Sharma and Ms. Nishi Rathore, Advocates for R-3.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTAJUDGMENT1. The present writ petition has been filed by the Petitioner/Intertek IndiaPvt. Ltd., under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, assailing the orderdated 31.05.2024 (Impugned Debarment Order) issued by Respondent No. 2/Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited (BHEL), whereb...
Mohan Ram Trading Pvt. Ltd. vs Aditya Birla Finance Ltd.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 9096/2020 MOHAN RAM TRADING PVT. LTD. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ravi Data, Mr. Rajesh Sharma and Ms. Barkha Data, Advs. (through VC)versusADITYA BIRLA FINANCE LTD. .....Respondent Through: Ms. Ojasvi Sharma and Mr. Nirmit Bhalla, Advs. (through VC)CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER% 30.03.20261. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.2. Learned counsels appearing on behalf of the parties submit that thepetition has become infructuous, as the matter has already been settled between the parties. It is prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the present petition may be disposed of as withdrawn.3. Keeping in view the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is disposed of as withdrawn. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J MARCH 30, 2026/sds/iskThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of t...
Punjab Ball Bearing and Machinery Corp vs Commissioner of State GST an ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 7002/2025 PUNJAB BALL BEARING AND MACHINERY CORP.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Siddarth Malhotra and Mr. Prerak Khurana, AdvocatesversusCOMMISSIONER OF STATE GST AND VAT, DEPARTMENT OF TRADE AND TAXES, DELHI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Urvi Mohan, Advocate, Panel Counsel for GNCTDCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NITIN WASUDEO SAMBREHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAULORDER% 30.03.20261. The prayer in the petition is for issuance of directions to the respondent to disburse the IGST return along with statutory interest in terms of Section 56 of the CGST Act, 2017.2. In response to the notice, the counsel for the respondent, Ms. UrviMohan states, on instructions, that from the Customs, the appropriate documents are received and the request of the petitioner shall be processed within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt of documents from the Customs Department.3. In view of aforesaid statement made on instructions, the same i...
Bharat Bhushan vs Smt. Mamta Sharma & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
$~29 & 30* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ RFA 497/2025 CM APPL. 33479/2025 (stay), CM APPL. 1441/2026 (for early hearing) BHARAT BHUSHAN .....Appellant Through: Mr. Radhe Shyam Sharma, Advocate.versusSMT. MAMTA SHARMA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Puneet Sharma, Esq., Advocate. RFA 592/2025, CM APPL. 39482/2025 (stay), CM APPL. 1454/2026 (for early hearing) BHARAT BHUSHAN .....Appellant Through: Mr. Radhe Shyam Sharma, Advocate.versusSMT. MAMTA SHARMA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Puneet Sharma, Esq., Advocate.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNAORDER% 30.03.20261. Learned counsel on behalf of the Appellant, on instructions, submits that the decree has been executed and the Appeals have become infructuous.2. Learned counsel on behalf of the Appellant, on instructions, seeks permission to withdraw these Appeals.3. The Appeals are permitted to be withdrawn and disposed of Accordingly. The pending Applications also stand disposed of....
M/S Classic CIVIL Engineers Pvt. Ltd. (Formerly Known as Classic Engin ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 13285/2021 and CM APPL. 41900/2021 M/S CLASSIC CIVIL ENGINEERS PVT. LTD. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS CLASSIC ENGINEERS.) .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rahul Aggarwal, Advocate.versusM/S NBCC (INDIA) LIMITED .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 30.03.20261. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not have any instructions and prays for discharge. Accordingly, he stands discharged from the matter.2. None appears for the petitioner despite the matter is called out in second round.3. The petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution. The pending application(s), if any, also stands dismissed. PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J MARCH 30, 2026 aksThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/04/2026 at 11:22:29...
M/S Lall Construction India Limited vs Union of India &Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
$~ 21 to 24* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 13066/2023, CM APPL. 51591/2023, CM APPL. APPL. 70228/2025 + W.P.(C) 13067/2023, CM APPL. 51593/2023, CM APPL. APPL. 70226/2025 + W.P.(C) 13587/2023, CM APPL. 53627/2023, CM APPL. APPL. 70223/2025 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. .....Respondents + W.P.(C) 13801/2023, CM APPL. 54590/2023, CM APPL. APPL. 70235/2025 UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS .....RespondentsCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 30.03.20261. The challenge is continued to the decision of forfeiture of the earnestmoney deposited by the petitioner. It is pointed out by Mr. Neeraj Malhotra, learned senior counsel that vide the impugned communication through email, it has been decided to initiate action for forfeiture of Earnest Money Deposit (EMD) and banning of the business of the petitioners.2. It is pointed out by learned counsel for the respondent that the banning of business order has now been lifted. To that extent, the relief stands s...
Nisha vs United India Insurance Company Ltd & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
$~3 & 4* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of decision: 30th March 2026 + MAC.APP. 515/2019, CM APPL. 20946/2019 & CM APPL. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD .....Appellant Through: Ms. Suman Bagga, Ms. Mouli Sharma, Advocates.versusNISHA & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Manish Maini, Ms. Aastha Chauhan, Advocates for Respondent No.1 along with Ms. Nisha in person. (4) + MAC.APP. 796/2019 NISHA .....Appellant Through: Mr. Manish Maini, Ms. Aastha Chauhan, Advocates along with Ms. Nisha in person.versusUNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD & ORS .....Respondents Through: Ms. Suman Bagga, Ms. Mouli Sharma, Advocates for Respondent No.1.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYALJUDGMENTANISH DAYAL, J (ORAL)1. These cross-appeals have been filed by the Insurance Company and the claimant. MAC.APP. 515/2019 has been filed by the Insurance Digitally Signed By:RAHUL Page 1 of 12Company seeking modification of the impugned award dated 23rd January 2019 passed by th...
Balbir Singh Julka vs State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 2330/2025, CRL.M.A. 1827/2026, 1907/2026 & 1950/2026 BALBIR SINGH JULKA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Meghan, Advocate.versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State with SI Prahlad, Special CellCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIAORDER% 30.03.20261. The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 320/2024 of PS Special Cell for offence under Section 22/29 of NDPS Act.2. At the outset, learned APP submits that the documents in terms withorder dated 13.02.2026 have not been filed by the accused/applicant till date.In response, learned counsel for accused/applicant, on instructions, seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to file afresh before the trial court along with the said documents. Basically, those documents according to the accused/applicant would show that the allegedly recovered drugs were being lawfully sold by the accused/applicant in...
Ram Sahai Tiwari vs M/S Arihant Pharmaceuticals
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 10574/2019 RAM SAHAI TIWARI .....Petitioner Through: NoneversusM/S ARIHANT PHARMACEUTICALS .....Respondent Through: Mr. Md. Qamar Ali and Ms. Priyanka, AdvocatesCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRIORDER% 30.03.20261. On the last date of hearing, noting the absence of the petitioner/his counsel for the last few dates, adverse orders were deferred. Even today, the petitioner remains unrepresented.2. In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed in default for non-prosecution. MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J MARCH 30, 2026 naThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/04/2026 at 11:10:43...