Delhi Court March 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Satinder Singh vs the Commissioner MCD of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 17113/2025 with CM APPL. 70383/2025 SATINDER SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Counsel (appearance not given)versusTHE COMMISSIONER MCD OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Anubhav Gupta, ASC for MCD. Mr. Arjun Mahajan, Standing Counsel with Ms. Monica Batra, Mr. Apoorv Upmanyu & Mr. Ravikant Kumar, Advocates for STF.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALORDER% 30.03.20261. The present writ petition has been filed seeking directions for takingaction against the unauthorized construction in the property bearing no. WZ- 174, Gali No. 4, Old Sahib Pura, near Singh Sabha Gurudwara, New Delhi- 110018 (hereinafter subject property).2. Notice in the present petition was issued vide order dated 12thNovember, 2025 and the petitioner was directed to file an affidavit as to the number of petitions filed by him. Paragraph no. 8 of the said order is set out below: 8. The petitioner is directed to file an affidavit as to th...
Shantanu Prakash vs Union of India
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 13149/2023, CM APPL. 51934/2023, CM APPL. SHANTANU PRAKASH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Darpan Wadhwa, Sr Adv. with Ms. Neeha Nagpal, Mr. Malak M Bhatt and Mr.Vishvendra Tomar,versusUNION OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Nishant Gautam, CGSC with Ms. Kavya Shukla, Mr. Vineet, Mr. Vibhav V. Nath and Ms. Theresa,CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 30.03.20261. The petition is for the following reliefs:A. Pass an Order directing issuance of a writ, order or direction in the quashing and setting aside decision dated 04.09.2023, whereby the Respondent has rejected the citizenship application of the Petitioner; AND B. Pass an Order directing issuance of a writ, order or direction in the granting Indian Citizenship to the Petitioner; AND/OR C. Pass any such other writ or order(s) as it may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice.2. By way of the decision dated 04.09.2023 (Impugned Decision), ther...
Hero Investcorp Pvt Ltd and Anr vs Ashok Kumar (John Doe)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CS(COMM) 1069/2025 & 24904/2025 HERO INVESTCORP PVT. LTD. AND ANR .....Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Kunal Khanna and Mr. Yashveer Singh, Advocates.versusBHARAT AUTO PARTS THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR MANJUR ANSARI .....Defendant Through: Mr. S.K. Verma, Advocate.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGHORDER% 30.03.20261. This suit is instituted on behalf of the Plaintiffs seeking a decree forpermanent injunction restraining the Defendant, its proprietor or partners, servants, agents, affiliates, associates stockiest from manufacturing, trading, supplying, selling, marketing, in any manner including online sale or dealing in any other way, any goods and/or any other products including two wheeler spare parts along with packaging materials under the Plaintiff No. 1s HERO trademarks including the device marks or any other mark/logo/ labels which are identical and similar to the Plaintiff No. ls HERO trademarks and/or device marks, amounting to...
M/S Huawei Telecommunications (India) Company Pvt. Ltd. vs Assistant C ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment reserved on: 18.12.2025Judgment delivered on: 30.03.2026Judgment uploaded on: As per Digital Signature~+ W.P.(C) 15970/2023, CM APPL. 64257/2023 + W.P.(C) 13572/2024, CM APPL. 56719/2024 + W.P.(C) 13553/2024, CM APPL. 56682/2024 + W.P.(C) 14898/2024, CM APPL. 62466/2024 M/S HUAWEI TELECOMMUNICATIONS (INDIA) COMPANY PVT. LTD. .....PetitionerversusASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, DELHI & ANR .....Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case For the Petitioner : Mr. Arvind Datar and Mr. Tarun Gulati, Senior Advocates with Mr. Kishore Kunal, Ms. Ankita Prakash and Mr. Anuj Kumar, Advocates. For the Respondents : Mr. Indruj Singh Rai SSC, Mr.Sanjeev Menon, Mr. Rahul Singh JSCs and Mr. Gaurav Kumar, Mr.Siddharth Burman, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAOHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMARJUDGMENTSigned By:PRADEEP WP(C) No.15970/2023 & Connected Page 1 of 108V. KAMESWAR RAO, J.S.No...
Chand Alam @Farz vs the State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 3884/2025 CHAND ALAM @FARZ .....Applicant Through: Mr. Neeraj Kumar, Legal Aid Counsel, DHCLSCversusTHE STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Sh. Sunil Kumar Chaturvedi along with the complainant in person Insp Ranvir Singh, PS Okhla Industrial Area.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 30.03.20261. By way of the present application under Section 483 of theBharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the applicant seeks regular bail in connection with FIR No. 839/2021, dated 21.11.2021, registered at Police Station Okhla Industrial Area for an offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.2. At the outset, Mr. Neeraj Kumar, learned Standing Counsel for theDelhi High Court Legal Services Committee, appearing on behalf of the applicant, submits that although all material witnesses have been examined, the applicant had filed an application before the learned Sessions Court seeking recall of a ma...
Guddi Devi vs State (N.C.T.of Delhi)
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 4440/2025 GUDDI DEVI .....Applicant Through: Mr. M.L. Yadav, Mr. Harish Chand, Mr. Anant Chittoria, Mr. Deepak Kumar, Mr. Prashant, Mr. Piyush Saini, Advs.versusSTATE (N.C.T.OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Aashneet Singh, APP. Insp. Gajendra Singh, PS DIU/NWD, Delhi Insp Ravi Prakash, PS Jaffarur Kalan, DelhiCORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 30.03.20261. By way of the present application under Section 483 of theBharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the applicant seeks regular bail in connection with FIR No. 49/2022 dated 08.02.2022, registered at Police Station Jaffarpur Kalan for offences punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 [IPC].2. I have heard Mr. M.L. Yadav, learned counsel for the applicant,and Mr. Aashneet Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor. The sister-in-law of the deceased is also present in Court and supports the submissions advanced by Mr. Singh.3. Mr. Singh h...
Novartis Ag vs Jagsonpal Pharmaceuticals Ltd & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CS(COMM) 1048/2025 NOVARTIS AG .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Abhyudaya Tiwari and Ms. Ananya Jain, Advocates.versusJAGSONPAL PHARMACEUTICALS LTD & ORS. .....Defendants Through: Mr. Shalabh Bhardwaj and Mr. Nikhil Mann, Advocates for D-3.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELAORDER% 20.04.2026 I.A. 10815/2026 (Seeking amendment/modification of the Order dt. 30.03.2026)1. This is an application filed on behalf of the plaintiff under Section 151 read with Section 152 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 seeking amendment/modification of the order dated 30.03.2026.2. Ms. Ananya Jain, learned counsel for the plaintiff states that vide orderdated 30.03.2026, this Court had permitted the return of Court Fees to the plaintiff under Section 16 of the Court Fees Act, 1870. She states that the plaintiff, through the Constituted Power of Attorney, has authorized the law firm Rahul Chaudhry & Partners through Mr. Rahul Chaudhr...
Sadhna vs Arvind Bhadwal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THEHIGH COURTOF DELHIAT NEW DELHI + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 361/2024 &CM APPL. 64748/2024 SADHNA .....Appellant Through: None.versusARVIND BHADWAL .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIVEK CHAUDHARYHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RENU BHATNAGARORDER% 30.03.20261. None appears for the parties despite the matter being passed over.2. A perusal of the record further reveals that none has been appearing for the parties since 30.04.2025.3. In view of the aforesaid, it appears that the appellant is not interested in pursuing the present appeal. Accordingly, the same is dismissed in default. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. VIVEK CHAUDHARY, J RENU BHATNAGAR, J MARCH 30, 2026 p/smThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/04/2026 at 10:56:29...
Srikanta Gorain vs Unoin of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CONT.CAS(C) 1760/2025 SRIKANTA GORAIN .....Petitioner Through:versusUNOIN OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ashok Kumar Kashyap, SPC, Mr. Kabir Hazarika, GP, Mr. Abhay Singh, Mr. Anshul Bhadouriya, Mr. Mayank Nagar, Mr. Kartik Goyal and SI Atul Sen, CISF, SI Kumar Gaurav, CISF, Inspector Sanjay Kumar, CISF and CT Rahul Singh, CISF.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTAORDER% 30.03.20261. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present petition inasmuch as the necessary appointment has been made.2. The petition is accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. SACHIN DATTA, J MARCH 30, 2026/clThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/04/2026 at 10:17:30...
Bashir Azam vs State N.C.T of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 3966/2025 BASHIR AZAM .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Suyash Sinha, Advocate.versusSTATE N.C.T OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, APP.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 30.03.20261. By way of the present application, the applicant seeks regular bail in connection with FIR No. 990/2023 dated 24.12.2023, registered at Police Station Nangloi under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.2. After some arguments, Mr. Suyash Sinha, learned counsel for theapplicant, seeks permission to withdraw the present application, without prejudice to the rights and remedies available to the applicant at the appropriate stage. At his request, liberty is also granted to move the learned Sessions Court for expeditious consideration of the matter, which the Court may consider in accordance with its own Board and the age of the matters pending before it.3. The bail application is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn, i...
- ‹ Prev
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- Next ›
- Last »